- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Getting a little tired of hearing 8-8 argument
Posted on 12/2/09 at 1:57 pm to TriumphTiger
Posted on 12/2/09 at 1:57 pm to TriumphTiger
quote:Me too. Unfortunately, it is a completely valid argument. Miles has had a shitty two years.
Getting a little tired of hearing 8-8 argument
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:00 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
I wouldn't want to change allegiances, but I guarantee all three of these will have better SEC records than LSU will over the rest of Miles' tenure.
This
And I will add, Miles will never win the SEC again.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:00 pm to TriumphTiger
quote:Just for the record, its not an "argument" it is a "fact." It is a factual representation of LSU's SEC win/loss record for the most recent two years.
Getting a little tired of hearing 8-8 argument
It speaks for itself.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:05 pm to Nuts4LSU
A coach's quality is measured by where the program was when he started and where it went under his control. If it started bad and got good, then he's good. If it started good and got bad, he's bad. If it started good and stayed good, he's probably good. If it started bad and stayed bad, he's probably bad.
I think this is a great point, but the original poster's point is that we need to wait until after next season to make this judgement. If next season is 10-2 or better, then Miles basically had one down season. If it is 9-3 or worse, then he is definitely trending downward.
I think this is a great point, but the original poster's point is that we need to wait until after next season to make this judgement. If next season is 10-2 or better, then Miles basically had one down season. If it is 9-3 or worse, then he is definitely trending downward.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:14 pm to Reality Tiger
quote:
If you ranked the talent during those years where would LSU be?
Hmmm...wonder who recruited that talent you speak of
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:19 pm to jpotts104
Funny thing next year LSU can go 5-3 in SEC and finish with a worse record than this year.
With UNC so early in schedule you could see a Washington type game only they are more talented with a better coach who could pull out that game. LSU will still be figuring itself out and breaking in new players at critical positions along the lines and possibly a new coordinator.
Then a few weeks later LSU has to prepare for West Virginia which runs an option offense. This will prove to be another early test for LSU. This is another team LSU can not coast and expect to win like say ULL/LA Tech etc.
Mississippi State is obviously improving, they played LSU very well this year and should have come away with victory if you just look at the numbers.
Tennessee is improving and they have a very legit defense along with talented running backs. They just need a QB who can protect the ball and not make silly mistakes. Same can be said with Auburn that they improved from last year, can they make the next step?
Arkansas with Mallett and Ole Miss with Snead will still be a thorn in LSU side.
Then you have the big boys of Florida and Bama, the guys LSU is trying to catch again. After playing them tough this year can LSU expect more of the same?
With UNC so early in schedule you could see a Washington type game only they are more talented with a better coach who could pull out that game. LSU will still be figuring itself out and breaking in new players at critical positions along the lines and possibly a new coordinator.
Then a few weeks later LSU has to prepare for West Virginia which runs an option offense. This will prove to be another early test for LSU. This is another team LSU can not coast and expect to win like say ULL/LA Tech etc.
Mississippi State is obviously improving, they played LSU very well this year and should have come away with victory if you just look at the numbers.
Tennessee is improving and they have a very legit defense along with talented running backs. They just need a QB who can protect the ball and not make silly mistakes. Same can be said with Auburn that they improved from last year, can they make the next step?
Arkansas with Mallett and Ole Miss with Snead will still be a thorn in LSU side.
Then you have the big boys of Florida and Bama, the guys LSU is trying to catch again. After playing them tough this year can LSU expect more of the same?
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:19 pm to Cornholio
quote:
Yea Port, check out his name, Reality Tiger. What a maggot. Oh the irony. Talk about someone out of touch with reality.
those are awesome facts.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:28 pm to Reality Tiger
quote:
LSU loses a lot this year -- you think they're not going to lose those games? Really?
ugghhh and Florida will be better next year than this year. The freaking stupidity on this site is amazing. LSU will easily be better next year than this year. We do lose a lot of talent but so many of the loses are going to be as good or better. QB, WR, RB should all be better next year than this year assuming TT returns.
DB should also be pretty solid. If we don't lose all our linebackers we will probably be ok there. Hopefully a certain JR (#11) doesn't leave from the pro's earlier than expected.
Half of our line is made up of Freshman and Soph's. We had just as many that redshirted that were just as good.
I personally think we are replacing a lot of quality people with guys that will be better than them.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:28 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
A coach's quality is measured by where the program was when he started and where it went under his control. If it started bad and got good, then he's good. If it started good and got bad, he's bad. If it started good and stayed good, he's probably good. If it started bad and stayed bad, he's probably bad.
This is a ridiculous oversimplification, and you know it.
quote:
I wouldn't want to change allegiances, but I guarantee all three of these will have better SEC records than LSU will over the rest of Miles' tenure.
Nuts4LSU, you have officially lost your mind.
This post was edited on 12/2/09 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 12/2/09 at 2:57 pm to omegaman66
quote:
ugghhh and Florida will be better next year than this year. The freaking stupidity on this site is amazing. LSU will easily be better next year than this year. We do lose a lot of talent but so many of the loses are going to be as good or better. QB, WR, RB should all be better next year than this year assuming TT returns.
QB -- Well, theoretically, JJ may be better with another off-season. Yes. Chris Garret may push him. Okay.
WR -- Even if TT does stay, we are not only losing BL but CM and RJ as well. Yes RR will step into two role, but we don't have depth there. We're replacing a WR coach and the position is uncertain at best.
RB -- Are you basing this on MIles' proven ability to get RS the ball? How are we better at that position next year? Yes Ridley and Ford may develop but that's a guess.
Big problems at OL, DL, and LB. Chavis makes one feel better about the possibilities at LB for next year, but we just don;t know what those players will be like and DL and OL are a complete disaster right now. The OL was horrible this year, how do you think that gets solved -- by the emergence of Chris Faulk?
Posted on 12/2/09 at 3:01 pm to tirebiter
quote:
UT in a major rebuilding year went 4-4 in the SEC this season. I did not believe UT would win 6 games total, plus they had a horrible QB who had sucked the past two seasons.
Could say the same about other teams. For instance...we were not sure what we had on offense or on defense. I thought UT actually would be much better since their only competition in the east was UF.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 3:12 pm to dgnx6
quote:
WR -- Even if TT does stay, we are not only losing BL but CM and RJ as well. Yes RR will step into two role, but we don't have depth there. We're replacing a WR coach and the position is uncertain at best.
RB -- Are you basing this on MIles' proven ability to get RS the ball? How are we better at that position next year? Yes Ridley and Ford may develop but that's a guess.
Big problems at OL, DL, and LB. Chavis makes one feel better about the possibilities at LB for next year, but we just don;t know what those players will be like and DL and OL are a complete disaster right now. The OL was horrible this year, how do you think that gets solved -- by the emergence of Chris Faulk?
Ridley is the best back at LSU. Ford I believe will be solid. Murphy is greater than KW. Shep will be more productive at RB also if we want/need him there.
WR don't forget RS to go along with RR.
QB JJ should not get worse. So we should be better there simply because he will be older and more experienced and should improve some. RS backing him up should be an improvement at QB from RS this year for the same reason.
And CG I am hoping starts in front of JJ. Not because I dislike JJ, because I don't but because I think/hope CG is better.
Line play is a big question of course as it is the only thing lacking from this team this year. The last two recruiting classes have had some really good linemen that should see playing time next year and will improve this area from this year. Harddrick from a JR college will step up and help solidify the line. I doubt our offensive and defensive lines can go anywhere but up after watching them this year.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 3:15 pm to jpotts104
quote:
I think this is a great point, but the original poster's point is that we need to wait until after next season to make this judgement. If next season is 10-2 or better, then Miles basically had one down season. If it is 9-3 or worse, then he is definitely trending downward.
That is essentially what I'm saying. It's not 100% about the W-L record (past, present, and future), but it's close.
I don't disagree that there is reason for concern. There is. I'm very concerned.
2008 was, by all accounts, an unacceptable year. 2009 has been much more grey. We see many flashes of 2008 and it scares the crap out of us. 10-3/9-4 is a pretty good season, but many see it as a veneer for a pretty mediocre team and/or staff.
Miles needs to show in 2010 that we are one of the big boys again. That's a very subjective determination, so I'm not going to hang a specific record or accomplishment on it.
In 2008, we were a mid-pack (at best) SEC team.
In 2009, we are at the top of the "... and all the rest" SEC teams. There's UF and Bama and then the rest of the SEC.
2010 needs to be an improvement over 2009.
This post was edited on 12/2/09 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 12/2/09 at 3:18 pm to TriumphTiger
No matter the record, 2009 looked a lot more like 2008 than 2005-2007, and 2010 will be more of the same.
Only delaying the inevitable.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 3:21 pm to Port City
quote:
You think we go 2-6 in league play next year and he is the one who isn't dealing with reality?
I mean, they did go 3-5 last year...
Posted on 12/2/09 at 3:24 pm to tirebiter
Not to mention how unbelievably close we were too being 2-6 in conference. UGA and MSU flat out should have beaten us without terrible coaching and execution by UGA in the last 2 minutes and a miraculous 4 down goal line stand vs MSU.
Also Arky very well should have beaten us if they had half a defense or a field goal kicker.
We are not only a disappointing 5-3 we are an EXTREMELY LUCKY 5-3.
Sure bama had UT and UF had Arky but we had THREE of those and somehow survived them all.
Also Arky very well should have beaten us if they had half a defense or a field goal kicker.
We are not only a disappointing 5-3 we are an EXTREMELY LUCKY 5-3.
Sure bama had UT and UF had Arky but we had THREE of those and somehow survived them all.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 3:29 pm to Reality Tiger
quote:
No matter the record, 2009 looked a lot more like 2008 than 2005-2007
I agree
quote:
...and 2010 will be more of the same
If so, then I'll be willing to entertain a coaching change.
quote:
Only delaying the inevitable
Well, at least he has a chance to right the ship in your eyes!
Posted on 12/2/09 at 3:32 pm to Reality Tiger
quote:
that's a guess.
Everything you've said is also a guess. Why is his guess any less valid than your guess at this moment?
Posted on 12/2/09 at 4:25 pm to TriumphTiger
It doesn't hold much water with me for the mere fact that the 2nd of the two years was an improved record against an equitable schedule. 3 and 3 against bowl-bound teams that obviously could have been as much as 5-1. Miles has the same record this season as NS had to end his 5th year and Nick's defense totally blew his last game. It''s coming to light more and more that Les and Crowton have been at odds for most of the last two seasons and a change at OC and other positions is probably forthcoming. In addition, of the four teams that have a better "two-year SEC record" than the Tigers, I predict that only 'Bama will be improved next season to the extent of LSU's expected improvement. Florida will slide back toward the pack in the east while UGA and UT should be slightly better. OM will slide and if Snead bolts for money they will plummet. Due to Les' affinity for playing loyal seniors(insert Alem,Woods,Alexander) I expect Chief's defense to improve dramatically next season with the influx of good D-line talent as well as a fast group of young Lb'ers. On the offense, Hitt's position will be improved and not so sure that young Faulk can't step right into CB's large shoes. Young recievers and backs will have to step forward but with an improved O-line and better QB play the new OC should like what he sees. Look for RS to blossom as the wildcard type player he can be. No more Trindon Hollidays but there's lots of talented return guys on this team, RS, RB, JW just to name a few. Special teams should still be better than average even with TH. Bottom-line, unless the Tigers slide back to an '08 type performance in the conference next season, there appears to be no need to cry wolf at this time IMHO.
Popular
Back to top


0






