- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/4/24 at 6:53 pm to okietiger
He was the top "name" willing to take the job. And that is where the AD can be justifiably criticized. But the AD also would have faced criticism if he hadn't hired a "name" coach.
Alabama waited and got Saban. Easy to say and see in hindsight.
Alabama waited and got Saban. Easy to say and see in hindsight.
Posted on 9/4/24 at 7:43 pm to Kenja
quote:
He was the top "name" willing to take the job. And that is where the AD can be justifiably criticized. But the AD also would have faced criticism if he hadn't hired a "name" coach.
He had the highest floor of any candidate available, and it's worked out fairly well.
No one can ever tell us who Woody should have hired instead.
Posted on 9/4/24 at 8:07 pm to okietiger
You’re gonna get killed for that kind of logic around here.
Posted on 9/4/24 at 8:19 pm to okietiger
Lincoln Riley looks pretty good about now.
Posted on 9/4/24 at 8:37 pm to Draco Malfoy
quote:yea another phenomenal coach
Agreed. Taking Washington to a title game doesn’t make you phenomenal. Someone else brought them to the Playoff in 2016

Posted on 9/4/24 at 8:54 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Lincoln Riley looks pretty good about now.
People would hav been on the fire Riley bandwagon after last season. Pre season 8 with the returning heisman trophy winner and they go 8-5. If we finished the reg season 7-5 last year people would have lost their shite
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:03 pm to okietiger
I didn’t mind the idea of Lane, but I never thought it was a realistic possibility. Kelly made sense. I’m not off the train, but I’m paying attention. I thought the team played really well in some ways, but we just had a little bit of everything kinda not go our way. There like 3 fumbles we caused and didn’t come up with them and a play that could have been an interception if I remember right. It was a wierd game in my opinion. It still feels like we could have easily won. I’m not sure what to make of that yet.
This post was edited on 9/4/24 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:09 pm to okietiger
Maybe Riley but BK was a good hire. He’s still a good hire. He cleaned shite up really quick. 9-3 is better than possibly 5-5 for a few more seasons. That’s a hole that’s very difficult to dig yourself out of. And we can’t just keep buying out coaches. No school let alone LSU has that kind of money.
He may not be able to win a NC but he can get us to 10-2 a couple seasons and hopefully 9-3 this season and most seasons.
He may not be able to win a NC but he can get us to 10-2 a couple seasons and hopefully 9-3 this season and most seasons.
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:10 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Lincoln Riley looks pretty good about now.
Let’s look at Riley, Kiffin, and Kelly their first two years.
Brian Kelly
School record before hiring: 6-7 (3-5)
Record, first 2 years: 20-7 (12-4) (0.740)
Record vs. ranked* teams: 3-6 (0.333)
Record vs. top 10* teams: 2-5 (0.286)
Record vs. unranked* teams: 17-1 (0.944)
Wins:
#5 Alabama
#8 Missouri
#20 Mississippi State
Losses:
#1 Georgia
#5 Alabama
#6 Florida State
#6 Tennessee
#9 Ole Miss
#11 Florida State
NR Texas A&M
Lane Kiffin
School record before hiring: 4-8 (2-6)
Record, first 2 years**: 18-8 (10-6) (0.692)
Record vs. ranked* teams: 1-5 (0.167)
Record vs. top 10* teams: 0-3 (0.000)
Record vs. unranked* teams: 17-3 (0.850)
Wins:
#21 Arkansas
Losses:
#2 Alabama
#5 Baylor
#5 Alabama
#16 LSU
#20 Mississippi State
NR Auburn
NR Arkansas
NR Texas Tech
**I actually excluded 2020 from this and used ‘21 and ‘22 instead, to make it a fair comparison. Using 2020 would have made Lane look worse.
Lincoln Riley
School record before hiring: 4-8 (3-6)
Record, first 2 years: 19-8 (13-5) (0.704)
Record vs. ranked* teams: 5-6 (0.455)
Record vs. top 10* teams: 0-3 (0.000)
Record vs. unranked* teams: 14-2 (0.875)
Wins:
#11 Arizona
#17 Oregon State
#18 Notre Dame
#19 Louisville
#21 UCLA
Losses:
#2 Washington
#6 Oregon
#9 Tulane
#10 Utah
#10 Utah
#14 Notre Dame
NR Utah
NR UCLA
*All rankings are based on final CFP rankings for the given season.
Winning percentages for comparison:
vs. Top 10
Kelly: 0.286
Kiffin: 0.000
Riley: 0.000
vs. Ranked
Kelly: 0.333
Kiffin: 0.167
Riley: 0.455
vs. Unranked
Kelly: 0.944
Kiffin: 0.850
Riley: 0.875
You can certainly argue that Kiffin and Riley took over worse situations. However, I already spotted Kiffin a year of rebuilding in order to leave 2020 out of it.
My takeaways are:
1. Kelly’s perceived deficit in “big games” stems largely from the fact that he has played tougher competition than either of the other two coaches listed here. Almost twice as many games against opponents who finished in the top 10. I don’t think people are giving nearly enough credit to how brutal LSU’s schedule has been the past 2 years.
2. Kiffin has been the beneficiary of baby-soft schedules at Ole Miss. I said this in another thread, but I believe if Kelly and Kiffin swapped year-two schedules, LSU would have gone 11-1 and Ole Miss would have gone 8-4. But people give Kiffin more credit for going 10-2 than Kelly’s 9-3. It’s silly.
3. Riley’s win% vs. ranked opponents stems from the fact that only 3/11 games were against top-10 teams, compared to 7/9 for Kelly.
4. Kelly has been very consistent. Only one loss vs. a team that finished unranked, aTm in his first year. Have we won most of our top 10 games? No. But you need to be a consistent top 5 team if you’re going to win >50% vs. the top 10. We aren’t there yet. Meanwhile Kiffin and Riley didn’t win any of their games vs. top 10 competition.
Will Riley or Kiffin bring USC/OM to the promised land? Maybe. Who knows? But at least be objective when comparing the records.
/rant
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:11 pm to lostinbr
quote:
Kelly’s perceived deficit in “big games” stems largely from the fact that he has played tougher competition than either of the other two coaches listed here.
The "big game" thing is basically confirmation bias at this point.
vs USC is suddenly a "big game", if Kelly wins then it wouldn't have been a "big game."
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:15 pm to lgtiger
quote:
quote:
6 Mike Norvell Florida State $9.8 million
Geeze

something tells me Bill O'Brien isn't making that at Boston College - or Brent Key at Tech -
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:17 pm to grizzlylongcut
grizzlylongcut
Fickell and Kiffin
Those were the two I wanted.
Wasn’t over the moon about Kelly but thought he was solid. However, I now think he’s a middling coach who’s over the hill and will keep us as a perennial 8-9 win season team. Seldom more.
Well BK did win 10 in each of his 2 seasons here, and i truly believe we will be 10-3 at WORST!!!! Yes I just have a hard time finding 2;more losses on the schedule. Please help me……

Fickell and Kiffin
Those were the two I wanted.
Wasn’t over the moon about Kelly but thought he was solid. However, I now think he’s a middling coach who’s over the hill and will keep us as a perennial 8-9 win season team. Seldom more.
Well BK did win 10 in each of his 2 seasons here, and i truly believe we will be 10-3 at WORST!!!! Yes I just have a hard time finding 2;more losses on the schedule. Please help me……


Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:21 pm to okietiger
I think most fans were meh about kelley but his stability and floor was attractive. He just never fit in IMO. I don’t know who would of been better but I do know it should have been a younger guy.
Kiffens
Venables
Stoops
Kiffens
Venables
Stoops
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:23 pm to Sevensblue
quote:
He just never fit in IMO.
What is this based on?
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:25 pm to SidewalkTiger
Come on now...he just looks cringe
Popular
Back to top
