2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did LSU do something that we are unaware of?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:01 pm to lostinbr
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:01 pm to lostinbr
quote:
I’d expect them to try to sanction LSU somehow to prove the point,
Yeah, for what exactly though? They didnt dress or even roster the guys everyone was freaking out about. It would be one thing if they just played them sat. anyways but they didnt. So I'm really not getting what exactly the SEC is trying to punish LSU for. Also if the SEC is going be ahead of compliance is Sanky just going to be judge jurry and executioner that university's are subject to without a chance to state their case to other members?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:02 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
Bad for contacting players, which every SEC program did post-5 for 5? 2 months earlier, players had 3 choices, and none of them included staying in the program. They ran out of eligibility and had to choose between staying in school, getting a regular full-time job, or pursuing the NFL. Once a player exhausts eligibility, they don't declare like after the junior year; they leave. Every SEC team targeted 2022 signees who had run out of eligibility before June 5 for the 5-rule—half the league rostered players who interfaced with an NFL team and signed a participatory contract. LSU seems blatantly targeted, and this isn't some left-field, Alex Jones-esque conspiracy. It’s crystal clear and coordinated.
If things go sideways and LSU gets kicked out, the discovery process will be pure hell for the SEC and the other 15 SEC members. Every SEC team’s records will be subpoenaed, including the Gump cock slurping SEC office.
Seriously, frick Sankey and frick these disingenous SEC school shite bag presidents who are clearly trying to concentrate and flex power. It's borderline neo-fascism and looks like classic collusion.
A small part of me wants to see these red redneck assholes kick LSU out. At the same time, LSU joins the Big 12 temporarily—until they successfully launch and win the biggest sports antitrust suit of this century, with the federal courts awarding LSU treble damages in the 11 figures. Have fun writing that $733 million check, Red Elephant retards.
If things go sideways and LSU gets kicked out, the discovery process will be pure hell for the SEC and the other 15 SEC members. Every SEC team’s records will be subpoenaed, including the Gump cock slurping SEC office.
Seriously, frick Sankey and frick these disingenous SEC school shite bag presidents who are clearly trying to concentrate and flex power. It's borderline neo-fascism and looks like classic collusion.
A small part of me wants to see these red redneck assholes kick LSU out. At the same time, LSU joins the Big 12 temporarily—until they successfully launch and win the biggest sports antitrust suit of this century, with the federal courts awarding LSU treble damages in the 11 figures. Have fun writing that $733 million check, Red Elephant retards.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 5:03 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:03 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
quote:
2. LSU did something really, really bad and it just hasn’t been made public yet. For the life of me I can’t figure out what that may have been.
If we did do something bad then it must be double secret probation level because it's not in the initial or amended complaint from the SEC.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:05 pm to sheek
You're hired.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:05 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
If they did then the SEC for some reason has not put it in any court documents yet. I say no.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:09 pm to white beans
The SEC is making this big court battle basically because Lane talked some shite and no one at LSU told him to stop. And some sports writer found some unnamed sources that said some LSU reps were trying to get people to sue the SEC/NCAA.
Is that really all they have?
Is that really all they have?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:09 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
Well we didn’t put them on the roster.
Our crime is we didn’t vote on a rule that is going to end up getting the member schools adjoined in lawsuits.
Our crime is we didn’t vote on a rule that is going to end up getting the member schools adjoined in lawsuits.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:15 pm to Srobi14
quote:
Yeah, for what exactly though? They didnt dress or even roster the guys everyone was freaking out about. It would be one thing if they just played them sat. anyways but they didnt. So I'm really not getting what exactly the SEC is trying to punish LSU for.
I agree. But the real question stems from the next part:
quote:
Also if the SEC is going be ahead of compliance is Sanky just going to be judge jurry and executioner that university's are subject to without a chance to state their case to other members?
Sankey might be the judge and executioner, but the other 15 university presidents are the jury here. We’re talking about a vote of the member institutions, not a punishment handed down directly by the league office.
I haven’t read the SEC bylaws but I keep seeing it reported that a member can be expelled from the conference with a 2/3 vote. If it takes a 2/3 vote to expel a member, then surely lesser sanctions can also be implemented with a vote. So I think the question becomes: do they need a concrete rules violation to impose sanctions (or expulsion) if it goes to a vote? My guess is no.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:17 pm to St Augustine
quote:
I’d bet anything I owned that in discovery it would come out that these guys were contacted by multiple schools
On "Locked On" I heard Wright tell Moscona he'd been contacted by 7-8 other schools. Moscona lightly pushed, but Wright would't name the schools. Admittedly, the schools/coaches may have a disclaimer by contacting the agent, not the player. Nevertheless, LSU was NOT the only school talking to Wright.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:21 pm to white beans
quote:
lane keeps talking shite. you're aware, i just don't think folks realize how much of a problem they have with it.
Not illegal to “talk shite”
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:42 pm to Alt26
At this point I welcome the breakdown of this conference. LSU response should basically be -we did nothing wrong and will sue the conference and each school . And ask for a mea culpa from them via sacking Sankey. Why stay where you are clearly not wanted.? Other fish in the sea as they say. Just do not pay them a dime - make them act, they seem to be doing it wrong at every turn and only helps the case for suing them.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:45 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
Asked the same. Just downvotes ?????
None of it makes sense
None of it makes sense
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:50 pm to Duke
quote:
This isnt about LSU, so much as the SEC wants to set the rules and not have to frick with the state courts.
This is what I think.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:07 pm to Srobi14
But didn’t Texas????
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News