0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Court date for LSU vs the SEC Nov 18th per WBRZ
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:40 pm to Tigerdew
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:40 pm to Tigerdew
quote:
If Tony Clayton doesn't tell Sankey to publicly kiss his arse this is dropped by now.
Yankee Sankey was too butthurt to understand Clayton never even represented LSU in the first place.
"But muh, the elected official in AG Liz Murrill said Geaux Tigers!"
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:42 pm to DrrTiger
quote:
"Defendants’ argument that they mooted this case by deciding, at last, not to roster the players is like saying that someone caught with his hand in the cookie jar has cured the problem by pulling it out. What’s more, Defendants still have their hands in the jar," the SEC said in a filing.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised, but I'm still somehow completely amazed this quote came from an adult lawyer and/or some official within the SEC.
This post was edited on 10/27/26 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:46 pm to DrrTiger
quote:
What exactly do these assholes want?
They are trying to threaten us into staying in the crosshairs of this lawsuit so that they can get the judge to hand them blanket authority for future self-governance. And after all their bullshite and very public saber-rattling about kicking us out of the conference, they just want us to fricking trust them that they won’t use that authority to then turn around and throw us out.
I do not think the SEC is ultimately interested in booting us, at least not the majority of presidents that they would need to make that happen. However, I don’t see how there’s any way that we could ever trust them again. And it was their stupid decision to add the attorney general and board of supervisors directly to the suit. They have nothing to gain from continuing this suit, even if it would help LSU get past this whole ordeal with the SEC.
I hope we get the dismissal just to make Sankey, Plowman and Ole Myth look bad for continuing to push this farce.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:51 pm to lsu711
quote:
Road game. How many tickets are we allocated? What’s the points cutoff?
Just hoping it's not a night ruling! That courtroom has voodoo.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:51 pm to nicholastiger
This post was edited on 10/27/26 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:53 pm to lsufball19
quote:
The judge over this case, Annemarie Carney Axon, went to Alabama for undergrad and law school. She was appointed by trump in 2018. Prior to being appointed, she was in private practice in Birmingham
Super
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:53 pm to nicholastiger
Can confirm.
quote:
TEXT ORDER - The court SETS a Hearing on the Motion to Strike (doc. 33 ) on November 18, 2026, 10:00 AM, Courtroom 6B, Hugo L Black US Courthouse, Birmingham, AL, before Judge Annemarie Carney Axon. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 10/27/26. (SAC) (Entered: 10/27/2026)
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:54 pm to nicholastiger
SEC told officials if it is 50/50 play that you didn't see clearly, always give the call to alabama.
if you look at patrick peterson interception, official was blocked out of plain view by a another player so he did not see where patrick peterson's feet were. since this was a 50/50 play he did not see clearly, he was given instructions by the SEC to call the play in alabama's favor.
the replay official was looking at a standard definition replay even though high definition tv's had been on the market for 10 years. this is lack of institutional control not having a high definition TV 10 years after it was on the market. the replay official used the tv being in standard defintion as his reason for not overturning the patrick peterson interception.
so we have COLLUSION and LACK OF INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL on the SEC. my arguement is as valid as the SEC.
if you look at patrick peterson interception, official was blocked out of plain view by a another player so he did not see where patrick peterson's feet were. since this was a 50/50 play he did not see clearly, he was given instructions by the SEC to call the play in alabama's favor.
the replay official was looking at a standard definition replay even though high definition tv's had been on the market for 10 years. this is lack of institutional control not having a high definition TV 10 years after it was on the market. the replay official used the tv being in standard defintion as his reason for not overturning the patrick peterson interception.
so we have COLLUSION and LACK OF INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL on the SEC. my arguement is as valid as the SEC.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:54 pm to bbap
quote:
I guess I shouldn't be surprised, but I'm still somehow completely amazed this quote came from an adult lawyer and/or some official within the SEC.
It is from their Response to the Motion to Dismiss. There were several bad sentences in it.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:54 pm to TigerCub
penalize Kiffin
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:55 pm to JudgeHolden
If we lose this, where does the appeal go? Appeals court in Alabama with another Alabama judge?
I'm asking how we can eventually get this out of Alabama
I'm asking how we can eventually get this out of Alabama
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:56 pm to Milk
quote:
I would love to see their witness list. Is there anyone with direct knowledge that LSU was directly involved or just a bunch of I know it was happening because I was told
This is on a motion to dismiss. No witnesses. This will be legal argument only.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:57 pm to CatfishJohn
quote:
If we lose this, where does the appeal go? Appeals court in Alabama with another Alabama judge?
The 11th Circuit. Will break down the judges there. Stand by.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:58 pm to bbap
quote:
I guess I shouldn't be surprised, but I'm still somehow completely amazed this quote came from an adult lawyer and/or some official within the SEC.
This case has had it all. Remember, Sankey couldn't define what an amature athlete is and then dropped this fricking gem over a month after the rule was put in place
quote:
From live testimony just now in the Pyburn v NCAA hearing:
Mr. Downton: Mr. Sankey, you’ve testified that the SEC follows all NCAA by-laws and incorporates them into your conference’s by-laws, which I appreciate, but did I just hear you say that as the SEC Commissioner, you don’t know what the current NCAA 5 for 5 bylaws that took effect 8/1/26 actually say?
Answer: I don’t. It’s the first time I’ve seen this new manual.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 3:01 pm to JudgeHolden
Have not verified this, but this looks right for the 11th Circuit, which will hear any appeals
Posted on 10/27/26 at 3:10 pm to DrrTiger
quote:
What exactly do these assholes want?
A piece of paper that says the conference can enforce whatever rules they want to.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 3:16 pm to Tigerdew
For what? Making him look like an imbecile when he took the stand? Or making him look like a hypocrite for selectively enforcing the rules?
I'm not sure he understands that we have two expectations. 1. We don't care what the rules are, as long as they apply to every school. 2. If you're going to enforce the rules, at least understand what they are.
Instead of blaming us for exposing his incompetence he might wanna try looking in a mirror. Something people with fragile egos struggle with.
I'm not sure he understands that we have two expectations. 1. We don't care what the rules are, as long as they apply to every school. 2. If you're going to enforce the rules, at least understand what they are.
Instead of blaming us for exposing his incompetence he might wanna try looking in a mirror. Something people with fragile egos struggle with.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 3:20 pm to Tigerdew
quote:
Sankey flat out said he wants a public apology.
Ok.
We’re terribly sorry that you’re such a douchebag.
Posted on 10/27/26 at 3:24 pm to misey94
quote:
They have a lot more reputation at stake, especially if they want to continue to rise.
based on the federal judges during Trump POTUS I call bs about reputation...unless they want to curry favor with libs
Posted on 10/27/26 at 3:27 pm to Tigerdew
quote:
Sankey flat out said he wants a public apology.
Verge -
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News