- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BK: 10 of 11 defensive players with most snaps will return next year
Posted on 12/5/23 at 3:09 pm to TigahJay
Posted on 12/5/23 at 3:09 pm to TigahJay
quote:
Sam played better than Burns and Ryan
What a high bar

All three of them are terrible at worst, and barely serviceable for our goals (even then only if surrounded by actual quality) at best.
This post was edited on 12/5/23 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 12/5/23 at 4:09 pm to ATLTiger
That’s not good news in this case. We return the worst defense in the history of our school.
Posted on 12/5/23 at 5:48 pm to ATLTiger
quote:
back (and Major, ha)
Not sure if it means anything but Burns did all the senior day festivities
Posted on 12/5/23 at 7:02 pm to ATLTiger
Please tell me Speights is out of eligibility
Posted on 12/5/23 at 7:09 pm to ATLTiger
Well that is a scary thought. Hopefully the new guy will run toward contact.
Posted on 12/5/23 at 8:36 pm to ATLTiger
Doesn’t matter if House stays.
Posted on 12/5/23 at 8:43 pm to ATLTiger
quote:So I’m confused. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?
10 of 11 defensive players with most snaps will return next year
I think you need to move it up a level and talk to “the defensive teacher“.
This post was edited on 12/5/23 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 12/5/23 at 9:24 pm to BayouBaw84
quote:Well, for one thing I look at it as a great sign as far as locker-room culture.
How is having all of the defensive players returning a good thing? Do you really think the lone reason the defense was horrible is coaching? Coaching contributed but it isn’t the only reason they sucked.
We used to have a load of guys ready to opt out and declare for the draft as soon as they were eligible, and it didn't matter if they were projected as 1st rounders or undrafted free agents. That mindset seems to be gone now, and I am glad. I'd rather have guys less talented that want to work and play, instead of someone who thinks his 4/5 star rating is a lottery ticket to be cashed in 3 yrs.
Posted on 12/5/23 at 9:27 pm to BayouBaw84
quote:
How is having all of the defensive players returning a good thing?
If nothing else it's good for depth and players can improve
Let's say we return 10 players and only 7/10 retain their starting positions because they get passed on the depth chart by someone else on the roster or an incoming transfer. That's an improvement in 3 positions and possibly more assuming some of the 7 that retained their positions also improved.
What would suck would be losing 8 out of 11 because the guys behind them weren't good enough to get on the field
Posted on 12/6/23 at 7:53 am to Ready2Geaux
Good post. I have coached at lower levels and have a hard time understanding why we were miserable at setting the edge all year. The coaches absolutely saw this. The players knew their job. Yet we consistently failed. This is harder to understand than missing tackles or gap assignments. I thought Savion was going to be good this year, but is still trying to figure out how to set the edge.
This post was edited on 12/6/23 at 8:30 am
Back to top
