Started By
Message

re: Are Ark. fans are upset that their coach didn't LET LSU score at the end?

Posted on 9/25/23 at 10:15 am to
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
23159 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Pittman discusses this. He thought that after LSU called TO on first that they would not score. Thought their best chance was force a fumble or block FG.


Pittman should’ve been smart enough to let Diggs score on 1st down. He would’ve had the 1:45ish to score a TD and 2pt to win. Given LSU’s defensive woes, that seemed like decent odds. Way better than hoping to block or have LSU miss a 20yd FG.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
23264 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 10:35 am to
Coach Pitt was concerned if he let LSU score quickly LSU would follow with a successful onside kick.

Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
23553 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 10:36 am to
quote:

You would think LSU running backs would stop and go down just short of goal line and let clock run. Of course, Arkansas defense could drag him over goal line.
This is unlikely on 1st down, considering how instinctive football is to players at this level; but it could have been coached up in the first timeout, if LSU handed off again (as we did).

Like others, I think the more irritating part was calling the timeout after 2nd down. They could have lined up, took a knee on 3rd down and ran the clock down, and called that TO with 3 seconds. At that point, the final play is the FG, you don't get a kickoff (with our shitty kick coverage team) and one Hail Mary from a guy with maybe the strongest arm in the SEC.

And speaking from the perspective of an also Saints fan, I wonder: if we swapped days, and the LSU game was played AFTER the Saints game, does Kelly go ahead and punch it in, instead of relying on the kicker?
Posted by Quatrepot
Member since Jun 2023
4154 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 10:37 am to
The running play was to eat clock
Posted by Reeaholic
Moss Bluff
Member since Jun 2019
1297 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 10:40 am to
No Arkansas had one shot to score. They could not have tried to score on the kickoff and ran a play if it didnt work. There wasnt enough time left.
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
13315 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 10:44 am to
Knowing we were laying down, Hogs should have carried Diggs in to score. I would have hit the floor laughing if they did.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
16686 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 10:50 am to
quote:

one shot to score


One too many. Inexcusable.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16149 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Pittman should’ve been smart enough to let Diggs score on 1st down.


Diggs was never going into the endzone. It would have been hilarious to see Arky defenders just stand up or not move and Diggs slide down at the one.
Posted by BornAndRaised_LA
Springfield, VA
Member since Oct 2018
6686 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 11:30 am to
quote:

I don't think LSU would have scored, they would have gone down


Then why run it at all and risk a fumble. They were trying to score. I don’t care what they say. It makes no sense otherwise.

They ran the ball from the 7, then from the 4, ultimately kicking a left hash 20-yd FG from the 3.

If you are really just killing clock, would it not be better to lower the fumble risk, kneel the ball squarely in the middle of the field, and kick about a 26-yarder from dead center?

I think they want safe plays (not passes or edge runs that could lose yardage) that could maybe score and would happily have taken a first or second down TD.

Otherwise the risk (though minor) of running it there makes no sense.
This post was edited on 9/25/23 at 11:32 am
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
47864 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 11:47 am to
quote:

wonder how long an offensive player can just stand near the goalline without scoring when the defensive player refuses to tackle them?


He could just fall down
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 11:55 am to
Dude if we weren’t trying to score we were really damn bad at how we did it. Diggs ran hard as shite into the defenders at the 3 yard line twice. All the defenders had to do was easily drag him and fall into the end zone if they wanted
This post was edited on 9/25/23 at 11:57 am
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61452 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Pittman should’ve been smart enough to let Diggs score on 1st down.
again he thought they would slide prior. He was trying to get ball back.

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 11:58 am to
quote:

again he thought they would slide prior. He was trying to get ball back.
This makes zero sense

If he thought lsu was going to not score on purpose, he had zero chance to get the ball back at all outside of Kelly mismanaging the clock like he did
This post was edited on 9/25/23 at 11:59 am
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61452 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

thought lsu was going to not score on purpose, he had zero chance to get the ball back at all outside of Kelly mismanaging the clock like he did
I thought they tackled him.

At the point Pittman thought LSU was going to try to not score. He had two choices. Hit the carrier and try to get a turnover. Or let him slide untouched

What doesn’t make sense there? What are you missing?
This post was edited on 9/25/23 at 12:05 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

The running play was to eat clock
You don’t need to eat clock

1:45 and it’s 1st down

You kneel

2nd down

Run the clock down to 1:05 and kneel again

3rd down

Run the clock down to 30 seconds and kneel again

4th down -wait til 3 seconds left and call a timeout.

Kelly was trying to score regardless of any being he says. There was zero need to run the ball if you weren’t trying to score
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Hit the carrier and try to get a turnover. Or let him slide untouched What doesn’t make sense there? What are you missing?
you are missing the part where it was painfully obvious lsu was trying to score. Diggs was running full speed shoulder down into defenders at the 3 yard line. Arkansas defenders could have easily had Diggs in the end zone with them

LSU mismanaged the situation, but Arkansas was far worse
This post was edited on 9/25/23 at 12:08 pm
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
8503 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 12:07 pm to
No they expected LSU to take a knee. Upset at the phantom false start at LSU one yard line and the host of other penalties and wasted time outs. Otherwise, they say they were the better team.
Posted by BornAndRaised_LA
Springfield, VA
Member since Oct 2018
6686 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 12:07 pm to
Completely agree
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61452 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

you are missing the part where it was painfully obvious lsu was trying to score. Diggs was running full speed shoulder down into defenders at the 3 yard line. Arkansas defenders could have easily had Diggs in the end zone with them LSU mismanaged the situation, but Arkansas was far worse
ok. That’s your opinion. The topic was why Pitt did what he did.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61452 posts
Posted on 9/25/23 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Kelly was trying to score regardless of any being he says. There was zero need to run the ball if you weren’t trying to score
except the clock stopping on incompletion

That’s a pretty big reason
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram