- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anybody having 2nd thoughts on this BCS vs playoff format
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:15 pm to LSURulzSEC
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:15 pm to LSURulzSEC
BCS top 4
Or
P5 Champs+Best G5
Or
P5 Champs+Best G5
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:16 pm to Perception
I always said the same thing they should have kept the BCS and take the top 4 teams. I knew it wouldn’t be long until we had some political bullshite just like they had before the came out with the BCS.
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:18 pm to Perception
never liked it,if you want a four team playoff, just use the top four from the old system
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:18 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Yeah, let’s have a system where the defending national champions could go 13-0 including scheduling 2 SEC teams and get left out that would be AWSOME!!!!
Counting this year’s USCe team as traditional SEC-caliber is generous and besides they play every year as in-state rivals regardless. It’s not like Clemson scheduled them for the SOS boon
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:20 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Yeah, let’s have a system where the defending national champions could go 13-0 including scheduling 2 SEC teams and get left out that would be AWSOME!!!!
Their actually #3 in the BCS simulation. Only Difference is LSU is #1
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:23 pm to Perception
The committee could work if there were guidelines for ranking. Instead it's a "what am I feeling today" system with a bunch of people that are too busy to watch all the football required to make an objective ruling. Instead, it's purely subjective and you know its influenced highly by the talking heads and box scores.
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:23 pm to Perception
I was against it from the jump
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:24 pm to Perception
Just make it open to eight teams and set up the rankings as they do in the NFL and be done with it
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:27 pm to Perception
What people are complaining about now isn't the committee's final decision, it's the way ESPN uses the committee to keep discussion (and viewers up) going before the final decision. None of this matters, I wish all of you would get that.
It's better now simply because there are 4, but no matter which way the 4 are chosen, there will be whiners. Best to be whining about being screwed at #5 than #3, though. 16 is too many, people calling for that really don't care about college football traditions, conferences, or anything. 6 would be the most reasonable number to increase it to, because every year #'s 7 and 8 most likely blew a game or two that rightfully should take them out of the picture.
It's better now simply because there are 4, but no matter which way the 4 are chosen, there will be whiners. Best to be whining about being screwed at #5 than #3, though. 16 is too many, people calling for that really don't care about college football traditions, conferences, or anything. 6 would be the most reasonable number to increase it to, because every year #'s 7 and 8 most likely blew a game or two that rightfully should take them out of the picture.
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:27 pm to Dlab2013
quote:
Their actually #3 in the BCS simulation. Only Difference is LSU is #1
I know, how would that be better to leave an undefeated defending national champ out? The Sandy vaginas on here are in nuclear meltdown because we dropped to #2, what the hell would happen if we were left out entirely ala 2004 Auburn
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:32 pm to Perception
Polls in general are stupid. Do power points and 32 teams.
Or just go back to unrelated bowls and mythical champions. That way was better as more teams get to end the year on a high note.
This current system exacerbates the lack of parity.
Or just go back to unrelated bowls and mythical champions. That way was better as more teams get to end the year on a high note.
This current system exacerbates the lack of parity.
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:53 pm to Perception
I always liked the bcs and had zero issues with it. BCS always got it right
Posted on 11/27/19 at 9:54 pm to Perception
I can’t wait until we have this shite show:
Oregon 13-0
Ohio State 13-0
LSU 13-0
Clemson 13-0
Oklahoma 13-0
Oregon 13-0
Ohio State 13-0
LSU 13-0
Clemson 13-0
Oklahoma 13-0
Posted on 11/27/19 at 10:06 pm to BengalBen
While this is true the BCS let you know where you stood. We would bitch but there wouldn’t be a magic moving target
Posted on 11/27/19 at 10:14 pm to Perception
The correct system was and always had been the BCS, but set up in a playoff format. The introduction of a committee was tantamount to taking two steps backwards after having taken one step forward.
Posted on 11/27/19 at 10:44 pm to Perception
Revamp the whole damn system and go like NFL but with 8 teams.
Winner of each power 5 conference is in. Figure out the other 3.
Winner of each power 5 conference is in. Figure out the other 3.
Posted on 11/27/19 at 10:46 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
quote:
The CFP has matched what the BCS would have been every single year so far.
the old BCS has LSU #1
quote:
Your argument is idiotic.
irony being what the BCS says right now
Posted on 11/27/19 at 10:48 pm to Perception
I never liked it to begin with.
Posted on 11/27/19 at 10:58 pm to releauxded2469
quote:
I always thought the BCS was the best system. I was for using the BCS system until the end of the season and put the best 8 teams into a playoff. That way “an eye test” isn’t needed from a bunch of morons in a committee
Couldn't agree more!
Posted on 11/27/19 at 11:05 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
quote:
The same committee who has put the same four teams in that the BCS would have every year?
Just call it what it is. You don't like the CFP rankings THIS WEEK, so you are melting like a bitch, and this is the argument you want to make because you think it's a good argument.
I think you're misunderstanding. I thought they were saying bcs rankings until playoffs and then the top 8 bcs ranked teams are in the playoffs. No committee at all. I think that would be best personaly and it has nothing to do with the rankings this week. I've been advocating for at least an expansion on the # of teams in the playoffs. I would like to see conference championships go too but I know some people would hate it because of the tradition.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News