- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 74 yo Superdome security guard, Alleged victim of Guice’s comments, tells her story...
Posted on 3/30/21 at 9:49 am to Big EZ Tiger
Posted on 3/30/21 at 9:49 am to Big EZ Tiger
O is gonna lose his job over this......
Posted on 3/30/21 at 9:54 am to dukke v
It's pure stupidity on O's part. Why not just tell them what happened? He called her and tried to make Guice apologize, but she didn't want to hear it and wanted him suspended (which they decided against). It wasn't a crime, but completely inappropriate, and at least he was making Guice take some kind of responsibility for what he did. But now, he just looks like a lying jackass when all he had to do was tell the truth. The problem is when you lie during a university investigation and it can be proven, you have much bigger problems.
This post was edited on 3/30/21 at 9:55 am
Posted on 3/30/21 at 9:54 am to dukke v
If they find proof that he called her, I agree that he will lose his job and should. I don't see how LSU can even have the appearance of a head coach lying about his involvement in this situation.
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:02 am to TigerLunatik
If they find phone records of O making the call then he is gone.
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:07 am to TigerLunatik
I find O's response concerning. "I don't recall" is not the same as "I never spoke with her" or something similar.
I find it difficult to believe that he would not "recall" this one way or another. It's not something someone would forget.
Does he recall being told about the incident by anyone? Does he recall discussing it with Guice?
He either knew about it or he didn't.
I have no idea what the truth is, but O's response is at least troublesome.
I find it difficult to believe that he would not "recall" this one way or another. It's not something someone would forget.
Does he recall being told about the incident by anyone? Does he recall discussing it with Guice?
He either knew about it or he didn't.
I have no idea what the truth is, but O's response is at least troublesome.
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:12 am to Gris Gris
quote:
Does he recall being told about the incident by anyone?
This was in the article also, but I thought it was in the first article that was in the OP so I didn't include it in the other post...
quote:
The law firm Husch Blackwell reported some of the details of Scott's story. But the firm was "not able to identify 'the coach'" who allegedly called Scott on Guice's behalf. The report said Orgeron denied to investigators that he had any direct communication with the alleged victim, saying Segar "told us about the incident," that an LSU attorney "did an investigation" and he was "not sure what happened."
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:13 am to TigerLunatik
If the attorney for the woman gets phone records and proves it was O, he is gone
Once again the coverup is greater than the crime.
Once again the coverup is greater than the crime.
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:20 am to TigerLunatik
Denying any direct communication and "not recalling" are not the same to me. He should have stuck to the response in the Husch Blackwell report or directed inquiries to that.
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:22 am to Big EZ Tiger
quote:Would a “yes” or “no” answer surprise you more at this point?
Was Ed O stupid
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:37 am to MOT
This is from Ree's thread about Orgeron on BR radio this morning...
quote:
Lawmakers have demanded Ed Orgeron testify after Gloria Scott said Friday that Orgeron rejected her request to punish Derrius Guice after he allegedly sexually harassed her.
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:50 am to The Pirate King
I’m just now seeing this, but what 20 something year old with access to college girls would hit on a fricking 74 year old?! I’m skeptical.
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:52 am to Pleasenewdc
The kind that would rape women and that's an attention whore trying to impress the people around him.
Eta: autocorrect
Eta: autocorrect
This post was edited on 3/30/21 at 10:59 am
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:58 am to TigerLunatik
One who needs some serious help....remember Cecil Collins ?
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:06 am to TigerLunatik
That's true. My mind just doesn't work that way, and it's hard to fathom someone doing that.
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:06 am to tiger81
couple of ?s about the incident
-did it occur at the Superdome while she was working?
-was it an LSU team event?
-how was Guice identified?
-how did & when did LSU get involved?
-who from LSU called this woman?
-did it occur at the Superdome while she was working?
-was it an LSU team event?
-how was Guice identified?
-how did & when did LSU get involved?
-who from LSU called this woman?
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:08 am to lsupride87
quote:
If the attorney for the woman gets phone records and proves it was O, he is gone
Once again the coverup is greater than the crime.
I'm at the point now where it's just time to fire the whole athletic department involved in all of this and just move on. It's time to get all of these shady arse people out of control at LSU. Our University is embarrassing on so many levels.
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:23 am to TigerintheNO
quote:I haven’t kept up with the recent stuff, but from what I recall when the incident was first reported on:
-did it occur at the Superdome while she was working?
-was it an LSU team event?
-how was Guice identified?
-how did & when did LSU get involved?
-who from LSU called this woman?
- Yes
- No (high school championships)
- Don’t know
- Worker went to supervisor who went to LSU if I remember correctly. The timeline made it seem like it was within a couple weeks since the championships are in early December and there was discussion about a suspension for the bowl game
- Don’t know
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:29 am to Gris Gris
quote:
I find O's response concerning. "I don't recall" is not the same as "I never spoke with her" or something similar. I find it difficult to believe that he would not "recall" this one way or another. It's not something someone would forget. Does he recall being told about the incident by anyone? Does he recall discussing it with Guice? He either knew about it or he didn't. I have no idea what the truth is, but O's response is at least troublesome.
Y’all are stupid for over analyzing this so much. He isn’t going to say anything about a potential legal matter like this without a lawyer or some sort of representation with him
I have no clue why everyone always does this
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:29 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
-did it occur at the Superdome while she was working? Yes, allegedly
-was it an LSU team event? No.
-how was Guice identified?By the alleged victim.
-how did & when did LSU get involved? That depends on who you believe.
-who from LSU called this woman? That depends on who you believe.
You might want to read this article.
LINK
I'm not clear as to whether Sharon Lewis has commented about calling Ms. Scott to get her to accept an apology from Guice. Scott claims they were both on the phone as I understand it.
She claims Lewis and O called her and told her Guice was ashamed and wanted to apologize. On the other hand, she says that Lewis called her back and told her they could not hold Guice out of the Citrus Bowl and it was his word against hers. At least, that's what the article says.
It's murky.
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:35 am to TheRouxGuru
quote:
Y’all are stupid for over analyzing this so much. He isn’t going to say anything about a potential legal matter like this without a lawyer or some sort of representation with him
I'm not stupid, thank you very much.
I see nothing indicating that his most recent comment was with or through an attorney. In my opinion, he should not have commented at all at this time with the exception of referring to what was in the previous report, at a maximum. If he sought legal advice before speaking, it should have been not to speak at all.
Popular
Back to top



2







