Started By
Message

re: 74 yo Superdome security guard, Alleged victim of Guice’s comments, tells her story...

Posted on 3/30/21 at 9:49 am to
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
215968 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 9:49 am to
O is gonna lose his job over this......
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
26097 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 9:54 am to
It's pure stupidity on O's part. Why not just tell them what happened? He called her and tried to make Guice apologize, but she didn't want to hear it and wanted him suspended (which they decided against). It wasn't a crime, but completely inappropriate, and at least he was making Guice take some kind of responsibility for what he did. But now, he just looks like a lying jackass when all he had to do was tell the truth. The problem is when you lie during a university investigation and it can be proven, you have much bigger problems.
This post was edited on 3/30/21 at 9:55 am
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
103000 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 9:54 am to
If they find proof that he called her, I agree that he will lose his job and should. I don't see how LSU can even have the appearance of a head coach lying about his involvement in this situation.
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
12456 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:02 am to
If they find phone records of O making the call then he is gone.
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:07 am to
I find O's response concerning. "I don't recall" is not the same as "I never spoke with her" or something similar.

I find it difficult to believe that he would not "recall" this one way or another. It's not something someone would forget.

Does he recall being told about the incident by anyone? Does he recall discussing it with Guice?

He either knew about it or he didn't.

I have no idea what the truth is, but O's response is at least troublesome.
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
103000 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Does he recall being told about the incident by anyone?

This was in the article also, but I thought it was in the first article that was in the OP so I didn't include it in the other post...
quote:

The law firm Husch Blackwell reported some of the details of Scott's story. But the firm was "not able to identify 'the coach'" who allegedly called Scott on Guice's behalf. The report said Orgeron denied to investigators that he had any direct communication with the alleged victim, saying Segar "told us about the incident," that an LSU attorney "did an investigation" and he was "not sure what happened."
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107805 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:13 am to
If the attorney for the woman gets phone records and proves it was O, he is gone

Once again the coverup is greater than the crime.
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:20 am to
Denying any direct communication and "not recalling" are not the same to me. He should have stuck to the response in the Husch Blackwell report or directed inquiries to that.
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
30359 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Was Ed O stupid
Would a “yes” or “no” answer surprise you more at this point?
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
103000 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:37 am to
This is from Ree's thread about Orgeron on BR radio this morning...
quote:

Lawmakers have demanded Ed Orgeron testify after Gloria Scott said Friday that Orgeron rejected her request to punish Derrius Guice after he allegedly sexually harassed her.

Posted by Pleasenewdc
Member since Oct 2008
1562 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:50 am to
I’m just now seeing this, but what 20 something year old with access to college girls would hit on a fricking 74 year old?! I’m skeptical.
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
103000 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:52 am to
The kind that would rape women and that's an attention whore trying to impress the people around him.

Eta: autocorrect
This post was edited on 3/30/21 at 10:59 am
Posted by tiger81
Brentwood, TN.
Member since Jan 2008
20926 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 10:58 am to
One who needs some serious help....remember Cecil Collins ?
Posted by Pleasenewdc
Member since Oct 2008
1562 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:06 am to
That's true. My mind just doesn't work that way, and it's hard to fathom someone doing that.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
43959 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:06 am to
couple of ?s about the incident

-did it occur at the Superdome while she was working?
-was it an LSU team event?
-how was Guice identified?
-how did & when did LSU get involved?
-who from LSU called this woman?
Posted by classicgold
bfe
Member since Feb 2017
6488 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:08 am to
quote:

If the attorney for the woman gets phone records and proves it was O, he is gone

Once again the coverup is greater than the crime.


I'm at the point now where it's just time to fire the whole athletic department involved in all of this and just move on. It's time to get all of these shady arse people out of control at LSU. Our University is embarrassing on so many levels.
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
30359 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:23 am to
quote:

-did it occur at the Superdome while she was working?
-was it an LSU team event?
-how was Guice identified?
-how did & when did LSU get involved?
-who from LSU called this woman?
I haven’t kept up with the recent stuff, but from what I recall when the incident was first reported on:

- Yes
- No (high school championships)
- Don’t know
- Worker went to supervisor who went to LSU if I remember correctly. The timeline made it seem like it was within a couple weeks since the championships are in early December and there was discussion about a suspension for the bowl game
- Don’t know
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
13286 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:29 am to
quote:

I find O's response concerning. "I don't recall" is not the same as "I never spoke with her" or something similar. I find it difficult to believe that he would not "recall" this one way or another. It's not something someone would forget. Does he recall being told about the incident by anyone? Does he recall discussing it with Guice? He either knew about it or he didn't. I have no idea what the truth is, but O's response is at least troublesome.


Y’all are stupid for over analyzing this so much. He isn’t going to say anything about a potential legal matter like this without a lawyer or some sort of representation with him

I have no clue why everyone always does this
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:29 am to
quote:

-did it occur at the Superdome while she was working? Yes, allegedly
-was it an LSU team event? No.
-how was Guice identified?By the alleged victim.
-how did & when did LSU get involved? That depends on who you believe.
-who from LSU called this woman? That depends on who you believe.


You might want to read this article.

LINK

I'm not clear as to whether Sharon Lewis has commented about calling Ms. Scott to get her to accept an apology from Guice. Scott claims they were both on the phone as I understand it.

She claims Lewis and O called her and told her Guice was ashamed and wanted to apologize. On the other hand, she says that Lewis called her back and told her they could not hold Guice out of the Citrus Bowl and it was his word against hers. At least, that's what the article says.

It's murky.
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Y’all are stupid for over analyzing this so much. He isn’t going to say anything about a potential legal matter like this without a lawyer or some sort of representation with him



I'm not stupid, thank you very much.

I see nothing indicating that his most recent comment was with or through an attorney. In my opinion, he should not have commented at all at this time with the exception of referring to what was in the previous report, at a maximum. If he sought legal advice before speaking, it should have been not to speak at all.

Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15 16 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram