Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

50 million dollar question?

Posted on 9/22/26 at 6:57 am
Posted by tigerball9
Member since Dec 2019
291 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 6:57 am
Why do all of the media people think we are the only school that is paying 50 mil for their roster? I assume there are quite a few others that are. A & M and Texas have to be. I guess they all hate Lane that much.
Posted by Cknsnghtmre
Member since Sep 2026
201 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 7:01 am to
Because people hate Lane and LSU.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
25994 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 7:01 am to
It’s really stupid and lazy. 1. No one outside of the program knows how much the roster is
2. It’s likely not the highest and there are at least 20 or so more teams either above the same or right below. 3. In our case we had guys we had to keep which would likely be cheaper but we also had a ton of transfers which would cost us more.

BK had fricked the program up so bad even with all we had we couldn’t plug all the holes with a massive roster and transfer portal. Lane came in to 0 qbs on roster, 1 wr and basically only a few oline with only one being even serviceable. The dline was also gutted, the only position we weren’t really in bad shape was DBs we had plenty of them.
Posted by Slevin7
Member since Sep 2015
2864 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 7:12 am to
Per Grok: (formatting didn’t translate well- sorry)

quote:

Rank | School | Estimated Budget | Conference -----|---------------------|----------------------|---------------
1 | Ohio State | $49–54 million | Big Ten
2 | Oregon | $48–54 million | Big Ten
3 | Texas | $45–55 million | SEC
4 | LSU | $47–50 million | SEC 5 | Texas A&M | $45–50 million | SEC
6 | Miami | $44–50 million | ACC 7 | Notre Dame | $41–48 million | Independent
8 | Ole Miss | $39–45 million | SEC
9 | Tennessee | $41–43 million | SEC
10 | Alabama | $38–42 million | SEC
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38695 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Because people hate Lane and LSU.
And Landry
Posted by IM_4_LSU
McKinney, TX
Member since Mar 2014
15016 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 7:36 am to
Its all about narratives. Polarizing figures gets clicks. LK and LSU are polarizing.
Posted by Ironhead985
Member since Jun 2013
10377 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 7:47 am to
All of those teams had way more continuity as well.
Posted by Slevin7
Member since Sep 2015
2864 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 7:55 am to
Absolutely.

Also somebody said [it’s not like we spent 50 mill on our top picks; we spent it on available guys in the transfer portal]

Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
25994 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 7:56 am to
Yea that’s overlooked a lot but Lane has been saying that all over. It’s much cheaper to keep guys than to have to go out and get so many.

We also were in a position where we had to over pay a few guys that we kept, mainly thinking Berry and Durham because we needed them but still had to go get other options. We needed a front line qb so had to pay up and there weren’t many great options at qb. One turned out to be gambling on games and we got the one coming off an injury.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram