- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3 Facts about disputed play at home
Posted on 5/25/24 at 8:23 pm to Burreaux09
Posted on 5/25/24 at 8:23 pm to Burreaux09
It was the correct interpretation and application of the rule IF, and that’s a big IF, Neal was on or in front of the plate prior to receiving the ball. We all know he was not but in their collective thought, they thought he was. So it was a missed call via judgment not a misinterpretation of the rule. Even the head official refused to question the judgment live on the air with the announcers. He would only explain the rule cause he knew they had missed it judgment wise.
0
Posted on 5/25/24 at 8:25 pm to Rmitch5474
quote:
Even if it is a balk call or catcher’s interference, the runner still must touch home plate for the run to count.
This is incorrect based on what they said
Posted on 5/25/24 at 8:44 pm to Rmitch5474
Actually in the case of a balk call, the runner is awarded the base. He need not actually touch it.
The whole thing was an awful call. Poor
Judgement and had no bearing on the play what so ever. Regardless of the rule, the unp should have let it
Go
The whole thing was an awful call. Poor
Judgement and had no bearing on the play what so ever. Regardless of the rule, the unp should have let it
Go
Posted on 5/25/24 at 8:54 pm to uptowntiger84
quote:
The head of refs or whatever he is that was on TV said the runner didn't have to touch the base since he was awarded the tag up. I find that very suspect. If that's the case why would you have to touch all the bases on a homerun? And if that's the case then the runner on 3rd can just walk to the dugout when a balk is called.
They said that since the runner was originally called out and then reversed, he was awarded the run, and he did not have to touch hole plate
Posted on 5/25/24 at 9:07 pm to hashtag
This is exactly what happened. The SC coach set this up and one of the umps took the bait which is really corrupt. The umps inserted themselves into the game based on a sold assumption that in most cases like this a catcher would step across or on the plate to stop a play like this.
Now it’s ok to “game” the umpires but the assumptions made on this play were flawed and “oh, By the way the coach forgot to tell the batter not to back out of the box. Given the situation the coach got lucky and stole an illegitimate run. Thankfully in the end it didn’t work. Baseball Karma I guess..
Now it’s ok to “game” the umpires but the assumptions made on this play were flawed and “oh, By the way the coach forgot to tell the batter not to back out of the box. Given the situation the coach got lucky and stole an illegitimate run. Thankfully in the end it didn’t work. Baseball Karma I guess..
Posted on 5/25/24 at 9:12 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
him being called out in "real time", then it being overturned after discussion removes this part from the rule, and he does not have to touch home.
Out of the whole bullshite deal, that’s the only thing it seems that the umps got right.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 9:13 pm to Rmitch5474
Ball don’t lie. Monster called game!
Posted on 5/25/24 at 9:17 pm to MarciMoshes
quote:
Neal went through the plate to catch. That's a balk. If the batter had swung. Even when he backs out it's still live. It sucks to get dicked on that call but it was correct.
Go back and watch the videos from different angles. He 100% DID NOT touch home plate or cross the plate before the ball arrived. One foot was even with the plate, but the head of umps said the catcher can have one foot out of the catcher’s box when a pitch arrives. Neal was good by the book man.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 9:19 pm to Eighteen
quote:
The ump signaled out in real time and let the players run off the field
This is being ignored and overlooked, but it’s absolutely the key point in the whole thing. If he didn’t initiate the discussion to overturn the call, then it’s all 100% bullshite. There’s no way anyone else could have seen if Neal touched or crossed home plate.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 9:20 pm to MarciMoshes
quote:
Too many people are misunderstanding Pitcher baulked...runner got home plate Catcher interfered...batter got 1st
You have no idea what you are talking about. Just stop. It’s not even worth explaining to you at this point.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 9:25 pm to LSUgrad88
quote:
And IF it was a balk how does the batter get awarded first base?
I’m sorry. I wrote balk, but I meant interference.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 2:45 am to Neilfish
Rule 7 d. 1) d) gives an exception when a batter may step out with no penalty:
A defensive player attempts a play on a runner at ANY base.
A defensive player attempts a play on a runner at ANY base.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 7:31 am to AtlantaLSUfan
Monster is the baseball version of the honey badger
Posted on 5/26/24 at 7:43 am to liquid rabbit
Doesn't affect the play .......Just window dressing .....
Posted on 5/26/24 at 7:48 am to hayden7cub
quote:
SEC - best baseball conference in the country with arguably the worst umpires. Makes no sense.
it's the same way in football. best on-field product with the worst officiating.
at least the conference is consistent.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 7:57 am to WackyChris
Milam’s big frick you to the SC coach and the umps helped me get over the bs call….
Now, if they lost, I would still be fuming….
Now, if they lost, I would still be fuming….
Posted on 5/26/24 at 8:03 am to Rmitch5474
How many times in history has a runner scored without touching the plate?
Posted on 5/26/24 at 8:13 am to Rmitch5474
LINK
His toe was in front of plate. No way they saw that in real time.
His toe was in front of plate. No way they saw that in real time.
This post was edited on 5/26/24 at 8:24 am
Posted on 5/26/24 at 10:37 am to Rmitch5474
The officiating is disgraceful.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 12:15 pm to Eighteen
Their “process” for making the call was completely improper.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News