Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Honest discussion about Baker and his defensive playcalling

Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:42 pm
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
13824 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:42 pm
You can say he didn’t have the personnel last year or the year before to stop mobile QBs, but that is not the case this season.

He has been atrocious against mobile QBs for the last three seasons and tonight showed he still cannot adjust. Even when he found something that worked in the 3rd quarter, he decided it made sense to stop the pressure in the 4th, which allowed them to score their TD and win the game.

Sure, the offense didn’t do well, but the defense was awful from the 2nd drive on.

In the end, Baker will never be a championship level DC. He’s overpaid and clearly has not learned.

The defense has plenty of talent, and looked to be confused for the bulk of the game.

3rd down defense is atrocious, and made multiple play calls that gave up the play and first down before the snap.
Posted by dandan
Member since Nov 2007
5136 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:43 pm to
Baker isn’t bad but doesn’t deserve top tier dc money. He’s a top 1/3 or so dc.


Posted by TigerNAtux
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
18781 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:43 pm to
Defense lost this game.
Posted by DalenSA
2024 DAT RotY
Member since Jan 2023
11235 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:44 pm to
Arch will cook us. Hell, Marcel might cook us
Posted by JoeWeDidIt
BR
Member since Mar 2021
340 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:45 pm to
Please give us a “tier by tier” breakdown then. Top 1/3 sounds like top tier in most cases lmao
Posted by OldTigerFan1962
Member since Jun 2025
56 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:48 pm to
Just maybe their QB was/is pretty dang good. Some of yall are just ignorant about football. If our QB could throw the ball accurately to wide open players we win this game.
Posted by Dulacrat
Member since Jan 2021
1692 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:49 pm to
Baker sucks arse in big games… another quality BK hire.
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
14611 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:50 pm to
Would have been much more accepting of the L had we gone down in flames being aggressive and trying to get after Chambliss. The type of D he calls is just excruciating to watch.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
49199 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:51 pm to
The end of the half was bad.

Hold them to a FG and it's 27-24 at the end of the game when we are going into win or tie.

The last RZ play call sucked when we kicked the FG to tie it up at 24.
Posted by tigabait01
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
4960 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:52 pm to
The mobile QB didn’t harm us tonight except for the one TD. The sitting back with 8 guys watching him did.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
13824 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

Just maybe their QB was/is pretty dang good. Some of yall are just ignorant about football. If our QB could throw the ball accurately to wide open players we win this game.


No one is saying Chambliss sucks, but anyone with a brain could see what Baker’s decisions were going to result in for both the first half and 4th quarter.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
13824 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

The mobile QB didn’t harm us tonight except for the one TD. The sitting back with 8 guys watching him did.


That’s the point. He played a defense for a mobile QB that can’t throw, aka Leavitt.

You simply just gave Chambliss a fee pass to take his time and go wherever he wanted.
Posted by HughsWorkPhone
Member since Sep 2017
1522 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

The mobile QB didn’t harm us tonight except for the one TD. The sitting back with 8 guys watching him did.


We did that because he was a mobile qb.

Even though pressure works just fine on both
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
36665 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

Even when he found something that worked in the 3rd quarter, he decided it made sense to stop the pressure in the 4th, which allowed them to score their TD and win the game.


Did you even watch? We sent pressure and played man on the last TD play. What happened? That play is why most defenses play zone vs a QB like Chambliss. There isn’t a LB on earth who can run with him and Spears was out early in the game. There’s no legit spy, so every play in man is a potential house call if you don’t get home or unless he misreads it. He didn’t misread much tonight.

Does the team get flat-footed and too passive in zone? Yes. They did tonight at least. But they have to improve because it’s necessary when you play a QB that fast outside.

We will play a lot of drop 7 and mush rush next week too for the same reasons. But Reed isn’t as accurate as Chambliss and he’s also missing 2 of his best WRs.
This post was edited on 9/19/26 at 10:59 pm
Posted by rlebl39
League City, TX
Member since Jun 2011
4827 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:59 pm to
Holy shite the melt about Baker is insane. Trinidad had a total of 2 yards rushing. He did a good job extending plays but guess what, that’s why he is probably going to win the heisman. Every defense in the country is going to struggle with him extending plays this year. We just got beat by a really good QB, no reason to act like the defense sucks now.
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6-- the Brazos River Valley
Member since Sep 2015
33105 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

Marcel might cook us

Marcel will cook us. I just hope the Tigers play well enough offensively to keep the ball most of the game and match scores with the Aggies. I don't want them taking over our stadium again.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram