- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/15/24 at 6:50 am to ipodking
No one other than folks like you who are full of hyperbole told you that. Most of us simply said he was rated as high as he was because of his name.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 7:48 am to mdomingue
quote:
No one other than folks like you who are full of hyperbole told you that. Most of us simply said he was rated as high as he was because of his name
This is what I remember. Sure there are folks that got in their feelings and say he sucked completely. That happens every year. Go read those Dom McKinley threads pre LSU commitment last season.
The big issue for most that follow recruiting somewhat religiously was his ranking and the justification for it by the services. Every other kid is made to jump through hoops to get the ranking they get. Manning was not held to the same standard. It's the same argument many will/should have for Jahkeem Stewart. No way that kid should be ranked top 50 in the current class with 1 year of hs ball under his belt and only glorified scrimmage to improve his case. Any other kid would be punished for it. If some kids aren't put through the same motions because of name recognition, doesn't that sort of make you question the whole system? If it doesn't, it should.
Being overrated based on name doesn't automatically ensure that the player sucks altogether. It just means he didn't earn the ranking he got. These days folks call that privilege. Funny me, I thought that was discouraged in current times.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 7:51 am to ipodking
This man is correct. Yall a bunch of bitches.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 8:44 am to TigerBite
quote:
the offensive structure pales to UT and Ole Miss and many others.
The offensive structure that produced a Heisman last year?
Posted on 9/15/24 at 9:05 am to ipodking
quote:
Doesn’t matter. He’s an elite talent and this board got in their feelings when he didn’t give LSU a look
He was never coming here so what would you like for us to do?
It was UTSA
Quit stirring shite that doesn’t matter
Posted on 9/15/24 at 9:33 am to ipodking
He was second team All State in the lowest classification in La. high school football.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 9:39 am to ipodking
How many posts did you make saying that JD5 was not the answer at QB ? I will always find it ironic and amusing that those who are constantly deriding people's intelligence are usually the dumbest people in the room.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 9:50 am to ipodking
A Manning at LSU, now really!
Posted on 9/15/24 at 10:42 am to ipodking
Bruh you dumb as frick. UTSA is awful. Will find out if he’s the real deal if he starts vs Oklahoma.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:00 am to ipodking
Most people, including myself, said he was a good player that likely warranted a 4* rating out of high school and we’d love to have him. We also said being the number one overall recruit was because of his name. His film and measurables in high school weren’t #1 good and he didn’t camp.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:22 am to ipodking
quote:
This board told me Arch Manning was a 3 star level recruit
ipodking
quote:
Bruh y’all stupid af
lol...I'm not saying he sucked, but let's see him do this against someone other than UTSA.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:36 am to ipodking
quote:
Doesn’t matter. He’s an elite talent and this board got in their feelings when he didn’t give LSU a look
I don’t agree nor disagree he’s a great talent. But are you basing this off of one game against a team that would put up a good game against high school teams?
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:45 am to ExpoTiger
quote:
He’s WAy better than anyone here gave him credit for. Including g myself.
Based off playing UTSA?

Some of you really do forget how “great” some awful QBs looked against awful competition.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:52 am to Geauxgurt
Also, a manning was never coming to LSU. Archie was an Ole Miss Reb and hated LSU.
He blames the Saints for his overrated arse winning nothing during his NFL career, when he was simply not that great to carry a team.
He pushed his kids away from LSU every chance he got. That is fine, and his perogative.
In the end, his grandson only got his absurd recruiting ranking because of his name and nothing more. Kid has talent, but is not a 4-star prospect much less a 5-star #1 player in the country prospect.
He may develop into a great QB as he has the pedigree, but proved at no point including yesterday’s game that he deserves all the praise he was given.
He blames the Saints for his overrated arse winning nothing during his NFL career, when he was simply not that great to carry a team.
He pushed his kids away from LSU every chance he got. That is fine, and his perogative.
In the end, his grandson only got his absurd recruiting ranking because of his name and nothing more. Kid has talent, but is not a 4-star prospect much less a 5-star #1 player in the country prospect.
He may develop into a great QB as he has the pedigree, but proved at no point including yesterday’s game that he deserves all the praise he was given.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 1:00 pm to ipodking
Let's see him play a good team away from home.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 1:33 pm to DCtiger1
A good rule of thumb on this site, ignore anyone with "king" in their username. They all are miserable human beings and just bitch about LSU.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 5:34 pm to ipodking
quote:
his board told me Arch Manning was a 3 star level recruitby ipodkingBruh y’all stupid af
You listened to this board. Now who’s stupid af?
Popular
Back to top
