Started By
Message
locked post

Texas mod just said they were told they are out on McKinley

Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:19 am
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
30975 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:19 am
Said it’s 50/50 OU or A&M but this recruitment won’t be over till December.

LSU is trying to get him to a game and so is Texas.
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
53570 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:22 am to
quote:

recruitment won’t be over till December.


Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
73665 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:23 am to
At what point do these bidding wars get so out of hand that some of these schools can only shell out for a few big guys in the class and the rest start to fall off?

ETA: Also, Oklahoma? Under that cokehead?
This post was edited on 9/1/23 at 8:24 am
Posted by nwallb2
Member since Jun 2018
874 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:25 am to
Imagine wanting to go live in College Station or Norman Oklahoma when your family is less than an hour from Baton Rouge. And both those teams are coming off awful years.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
30975 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:36 am to
quote:

ETA: Also, Oklahoma? Under that cokehead?


That’s the biggest oddball

He’s all about education and proximity yet goes to OU?
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
32887 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:38 am to
quote:

At what point do these bidding wars get so out of hand that some of these schools can only shell out for a few big guys in the class and the rest start to fall off?


Its why NIL was short sighted for the majority of college athletes. Only the stars will get the money. Id bet you see less money given for athletic scholarships in the future so donors can give more money to collectives and such to buy the big stars.
Posted by Tigerfan14
Member since Jun 2014
1438 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:56 am to
quote:

At what point do these bidding wars get so out of hand that some of these schools can only shell out for a few big guys in the class and the rest start to fall off?


People will never learn. Happens in the pro game all the time too where teams just don’t learn their lesson and get desperate.
Posted by Brendoni
Oklahoma City, Ok
Member since Apr 2009
21755 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 9:08 am to
Two teams that will have a different coach, within the next 2 years. OU has one of the easiest schedules in the country this year, yet they could still go 8-4. The following year, they will likely go 7-5 at best. We all know about Jimbo, and the dumpster fire he’s running in College Station. I don’t understand it, but it is what it is.
Posted by BetaPhi681
Hammond, LA
Member since Apr 2023
141 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 9:31 am to
Project P glad I'm not the only one who's noticed that Venables is coked out.....
Posted by cajuntiger1010
Member since Jan 2015
11307 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 9:50 am to
Kid won’t get developed at A&M. He has great potential but is not elite right now by any means. Even if he chose LSU I think he’d need a red shirt.
Posted by BetaPhi681
Hammond, LA
Member since Apr 2023
141 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 9:55 am to
Fong'd to 8&4
Posted by LSU1215
Monroe
Member since Aug 2009
4259 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 10:14 am to
Yeah been popping up on X wish him the best. TigerBait!
Posted by MightyYat
StB Garden District
Member since Jan 2009
25029 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Fong'd to 8&4


I mean, you can't worry about a kid with this level of decision making skills. Whoever is recruiting him won't even be there in a year or two and he'll be in the portal.

Get that bag young man.
Posted by SemiNoblePursuit
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2016
1969 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 10:18 am to
Hope he enjoys mediocrity the next 3-4 years.
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 10:25 am to
If he's going to either it's about money and nothing else. Fisher will be gone at TAMU as soon as money allows it for them and Ven team was fricking awful last season to the point he might be on the hot seat this year. He's a good DC but he's not really HC material which is why he sat under Dabo so long.
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
39578 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 10:39 am to
I’m gonna laugh if he ends up at Aggie
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
53570 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 11:17 am to
What a wild turn. Texas thought they had him.
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
11672 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 11:22 am to
quote:


Its why NIL was short sighted for the majority of college athletes. Only the stars will get the money. Id bet you see less money given for athletic scholarships in the future so donors can give more money to collectives and such to buy the big star


We have seen this play out in the NFL where the collective bargaining agreements favor the big stars and the league has gotten progressively younger with the rest of the roster.
Posted by GeauxLSU4
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2012
11471 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 11:26 am to
Texas thought they had McKinley and Mack. We still need Texas, Florida, and A$M to look terrible this year. I’d like to start plucking guys off their commitment list, especially if we look really good.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
32073 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 11:51 am to
quote:

We have seen this play out in the NFL where the collective bargaining agreements favor the big stars and the league has gotten progressively younger with the rest of the roster.


The opposite was arguably worse with guys like Jamarcus Russell and Sam Bradford getting massive contracts without having done a single thing in the NFL. It used to be that if you missed on a top 10 QB you had a big hole to climb out of to fix your mistake.

The difference with NIL and the NFL, however, is the length of contracts. In the NFL owners are locked into a multi-year deal. With NIL, the payors aren't. You'll often hear this player or that player received a $500k, $1.3M NIL deal when, in reality, that an estimated number spread out over the course of 3-4 years. The reality is the player is getting less money on what amounts to a "one year" contract. Often less than that because a Texas booster isn't going to sign a multi-year NIL contract only to still be on the hook to pay a guy who transferred to Oklahoma after one season.

Texas and Texas A&M have a ton of money to offer. From their perspective they will pay a ton to sign a recruit because it is really just a one year investment. If the kid is great, the booster will re-up or renegotiate. If not, they are really all that concerned with him transferring.

From the player's perspective they are taking the big initial payday with the understanding they have the leverage to "renegotiate" the following season as a "free agent"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram