Started By
Message

re: LSU “Feels Better Than Ever” On Flip Chances For 5 Star+ DL Jalen Brewster | UPDATE 6/30

Posted on 6/28/26 at 5:30 pm to
Posted by GeauxLSUBengalTigers
Member since Sep 2016
591 posts
Posted on 6/28/26 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

Tech has 2 Young billionaire ex Tech football players that want to win. Type in Double Eagle. If they want him even we can't compete with Tech. Nor Texas or A&M. Those guys are loaded and want Tech at the top.
What an incredibly naive statement.
Posted by GeauxLSUBengalTigers
Member since Sep 2016
591 posts
Posted on 6/28/26 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

Yeah these guys refuse to come to grips with the fact that 95% of the reason a players chooses a school these days is money
There is no official stat for this but you're high by about 20%.

Do you always say what you think as fact?

Dumb.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49834 posts
Posted on 6/28/26 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

. Texas Tech has never won anything, and will never win anything.


Don't bet against anything. If Indiana can win a natty anyone can
Posted by ExpoTiger
Member since Jul 2014
7557 posts
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

Don't bet against anything. If Indiana can win a natty anyone can

Cignettis don’t grow on trees
Posted by El Sid
College Station, TX
Member since Jan 2012
263 posts
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:35 pm to
Bring Cookie
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla
North Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
3925 posts
Posted on 6/28/26 at 9:42 pm to
What "buyout" are they referencing? Is this just how they are defining paying more than TT as far as nil goes or is there already a contractual obligation hes made to TT?
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
48114 posts
Posted on 6/28/26 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

What "buyout" are they referencing? Is this just how they are defining paying more than TT as far as nil goes or is there already a contractual obligation hes made to TT?


He’s got a contract via TT and some has been paid - they’d have to cover that
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla
North Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
3925 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:11 am to
Thank you, thats crazy thats allowed. He hasn't even graduated high school yet. If an entity wants to pay a high schooler to do name, image and likeness thats fine but it shouldn't have any ties to a college until that player is officially signed and eligible to play with that institution. A 16 year old kid getting financially and legally locked in to a school and it being contractually leveraged against them should be illegal just on principle alone.
Posted by SofaKingTrill
Member since Mar 2008
8212 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:14 am to
quote:

If he signed his NIL deal then yes. Remember the quarterback from Washington that was entertaining going to LSU and they were looking into his buyout.



I don't believe he has already been paid by Texas Tech and signed an NIL package. I could be wrong but I believe the buyout theyre referring to is just an inferred buyout, as in, how much of a package would we have to put together to get you to flip from Texas Tech.

I could be wrong.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 5:22 am
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
22950 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

I don't believe he has already been paid by Texas Tech and signed an NIL package. I could be wrong but I believe the buyout theyre referring to is just an inferred buyout, as in, how much of a package would we have to put together to get you to flip from Texas Tech.

I could be wrong.


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

Jalen Brewster’s Property Purchase Adds Confusing Wrinkle To Recruitment As LSU Looks For NIL ‘Buyout’




quote:

New developments suggest that Brewster already signed an NIL deal with the Red Raiders. However, it is unclear as to whether the purchase of property in Lubbock is part of that agreement or separate.


quote:

According to Colby Faria of TigerBait.com, the situation has escalated quickly over the last few days. Brewster is showing a strong interest in LSU but NIL money could be a factor. The Tigers are apparently looking into what it might (or might not) take to “buy out” his deal with Texas Tech.


quote:

And here’s the interesting part.

It appeared as though Brewster (through his parents as trustees) purchased property in Lubbock, Texas at some point in early or mid 2026. Was this purchase made through the university or a booster with the university? Was this something that he purchased with money that was provided to him during the commitment process? Would he have to give it back? Is property considered in the buyout? What does that look like? Would LSU need to pay back the land? Would it provide a lump sum back to Texas Tech?


Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
34703 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 2:21 pm to
It seems like it's going to be too hard to figure out and pay back all that nil/home purchase.

That's why teams do it.
Posted by NijaPlease
Lubbock
Member since Jun 2025
126 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 4:13 pm to
quote:


Thank you, thats crazy thats allowed. He hasn't even graduated high school yet. If an entity wants to pay a high schooler to do name, image and likeness thats fine but it shouldn't have any ties to a college until that player is officially signed and eligible to play with that institution. A 16 year old kid getting financially and legally locked in to a school and it being contractually leveraged against them should be illegal just on principle alone.


Bet you wouldn't be saying that if it was LSU who had already signed him
Posted by ProjectP2294
West St. Louis County
Member since May 2007
79289 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 4:15 pm to
Why are you here?
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla
North Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
3925 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Bet you wouldn't be saying that if it was LSU who had already signed him



Definitely would, It doesn't bother me to actually have rules around protecting teenagers in high school from making short sided contractual obligations to college football teams. Or would I have a problem with any thing that is enforced to protect the school or the game, ya know like betting on football games...
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 4:25 pm
Posted by NijaPlease
Lubbock
Member since Jun 2025
126 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 4:52 pm to
quote:


quote:
Bet you wouldn't be saying that if it was LSU who had already signed him



Definitely would, It doesn't bother me to actually have rules around protecting teenagers in high school from making short sided contractual obligations to college football teams. Or would I have a problem with any thing that is enforced to protect the school or the game, ya know like betting on football games...


You'll have to show me where Sorsby played for Tech. Dumbass.
Posted by NijaPlease
Lubbock
Member since Jun 2025
126 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Why are you here?



Trolling corndogs
Posted by TigernMS12
Member since Jan 2013
5693 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 4:59 pm to
[quote]Thank you, thats crazy thats allowed. He hasn't even graduated high school yet. If an entity wants to pay a high schooler to do name, image and likeness thats fine but it shouldn't have any ties to a college until that player is officially signed and eligible to play with that institution. A 16 year old kid getting financially and legally locked in to a school and it being contractually leveraged against them should be illegal just on principle alone.[/

You seem to think these kids are just making these decisions alone after being prayed upon by agents and schools. No state lets a minor enter into a contract unless there is parental consent (and yes I know this doesn’t amount to much in many cases where moma/daddy want the money too), court approval, or a legal emancipation (which is another form of court approval). A 16 year old can’t buy a car, rent an apartment, marry or even post bail without one of those things happening because they are all forms of Ks. Most states the age of majority is 18 but MS where I am it’s 21.
Posted by southendzoneresident
Member since Jun 2013
1657 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:21 pm to
If I had to guess it's because Texas Tech doesnt have a message board website, just a Facebook group.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
36094 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

They sold their company for $6.4B. Todd Graves, by himself, is worth ~ $22B. I’d say we have a pretty good shot here


It’s not how much they are worth, but how much they will spend.

Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla
North Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
3925 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

You'll have to show me where Sorsby played for Tech. Dumbass.



You'll have to show me where Texas Tech wasn't just sucking everyone off in the Texas court system to try and get him cleared to play. Yall are the absolute last fan base to come in here preaching about taking the moral high road and doing whats best for anyone. It took your states dumb arse attorney general sticking his head up his arse, threatening lawsuits to get TT to do the right thing. I hope Sorsby is taking that five million he stole from Oil boy and betting 2 mil of it on yall going 8-4 this year.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 6:25 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram