- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is it true a regulation was just passed : colleges themselves can now spend millions NIL?
Posted on 5/26/24 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 5/26/24 at 9:01 pm
Is this true ????
7
Posted on 5/26/24 at 9:07 pm to TigerSaurus
Yes settlement with NCAA allows schooled to directly pay for NIL
Posted on 5/26/24 at 9:22 pm to docTQ4
Am I understanding correctly... that this will be like dumping lighter fluid on the existing horrible setup?
Posted on 5/26/24 at 9:30 pm to TigerSaurus
wait… so does this bust up title ix??
Posted on 5/26/24 at 10:00 pm to tgdk11
quote:
Am I understanding correctly... that this will be like dumping lighter fluid on the existing horrible setup?
I think so
Gonna be the Wild Wild West until there is a salary cap and players union
Guess this is another step in the process of eventually getting there
Posted on 5/26/24 at 11:26 pm to tgdk11
Professional sports does not belong in college.
Farm team them all.
Farm team them all.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 12:22 am to TigerSaurus
quote:
Is it true a regulation was just passed : colleges themselves can now spend millions NIL?
TigerSaurus
Is this true ????
The NCAA has reached a settlement agreement with various plaintiffs to settle 3 anti-trust lawsuits. The jest of the settlement is that member institutions will be able to pay student-athletes directly from athletic department revenue in a revenue sharing plan.
Anti-Trust settlement article
Excerpt from article:
"At its most basic level, the plan presumably set to being in 2025-26 academic year initially will guided by a cap of 22% of the combined total of certain revenues of Power Five conference schools. Among the revenues being counted for this are those from media rights deals, ticket sales and sponsorships. NCAA representatives said Thursday night the dollar amount for the cap is set to increase annually and would be re-set further, depending on whether the applicable revenues increase substantially (think, new or renegotiated TV contracts)."
Has absolutely nothing to do with NIL compensation.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 6:38 am to Curtis Lowe
quote:
The jest of the settlement
The word you're looking for is just though jest may apply here as well
quote:
Has absolutely nothing to do with NIL compensation.
Half the folks here still don't understand that the University can't be directly involved in NIL deals so expecting them to differentiate revenue sharing or direct salaries from NIL is a lot to ask
Posted on 5/27/24 at 7:46 am to Curtis Lowe
quote:
The jest of the settlement
Surely you gist.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 8:24 am to TigerSaurus
Tax payers paying for athletes. Don’t know how that will work
Posted on 5/27/24 at 8:37 am to GeauxZone90
Tax payers paying for athletes . . .
Perhaps it's like paying for defense.
Perhaps it's like paying for defense.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 8:58 am to Jester
Okay that was funny and correct…..
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:18 am to docTQ4
Sounds like these kids are now going to be employees and can now be critiqued just as the coaches are.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:20 am to Raging Tiger
In the clown world we live in now, NOTHING will bust up title IX.
It's way too controversial of a position to expect each program to pull it's own weight. Hell, we don't even require all of our able bodied citizens to do so.
It's way too controversial of a position to expect each program to pull it's own weight. Hell, we don't even require all of our able bodied citizens to do so.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:22 am to TigerSaurus
They didn’t have much of a choice. Collectives give boosters the ability to circumvent the entire athletic department. If they decide that they don’t like a player for any reason, they can refuse to pay (or over pay) whether the coaches want them or not.
Also, donations to collectives don’t go through the athletic fund, meaning those funds are losing donations. What happens to the TAF of everyone donates to collectives instead?
Also, donations to collectives don’t go through the athletic fund, meaning those funds are losing donations. What happens to the TAF of everyone donates to collectives instead?
Posted on 5/29/24 at 10:37 am to PUB
quote:MFL Minor Football League. Its ruined college football
Professional sports does not belong in college.
Farm team them all.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:03 am to PUB
quote:
rofessional sports does not belong in college.
Farm team them all.
This is what is going to happen eventually. Colleges will eventually get tired of paying the money, and it will somehow make it's way all the way back to amateur sports. That is probably a fee iterations away, and there will have to be the league that breaks off as a "minor league football league." I don't know how we get there exactly, but it's coming.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:01 pm to Curtis Lowe
quote:
Has absolutely nothing to do with NIL compensation
Whatever constraints they put on the direct college pay it is meaningless unless other contributions via boosters is also in the mix. And since the players want the money they should be obligated to sign a contract that stipulates if they go into the portal they need to cough up the money
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:20 am to Chrome
So if there is a salary cap, how long will it be before someone breaks it? A day? A week?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News