Does Brady get the Meatball treatment from this board?

I mean, their contributions to the program are definitely similar. So, yeah.

I thought it was stupid at the time, and defended him, but Meatball was obliterated on this board for recruiting failures on the defensive line.

I've yet to see a single negative post about Brady and receiver losses.

No, but Mickey Joseph should. Hopefully Frank Wilson replaces him

Arik Gilbert was never coming here without Brady and without us featuring moss, and he is the crown jewel of the class.

That's not how recruiting works. Coaches are generally assigned to recruit players based off of geography. They may talk to the position coaches some, but they are mostly talking to their assigned coaches and then Coach O.

For example, Jarrett's primary recruiter was Mickey Joseph and secondary was Bill Busch. Burton's primary recruiter was Bill Busch.

When Meatball gets the Broyles Award we can talk

LSU had arguably 3 5* guys at WR committed, a 5* receiving TE, and projected to get the best RB 5* in the country. It was too good to be true. That's historically filthy on offense.

You had to know regardless of what they said these guys want PT and more often than not, they'll allow someone to negative recruit for opportunity because rarely do historic classes like that happen for a reason.

quote:

---

I don't think Brady deserved any criticism. I was just seeing if the hivemind was consistent.

---

But this isn't an apples to apples comparison.

Brady has brought tangible positives to the program.

Meatball.....exists.

It is from a pure recruiting standpoint. Of course position coaches don't recruit just their own positions, which was one of the reasons the Meatball criticism was silly.