- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Apparently the overall #1 recruit Arch Manning was not even the QB on the 2a all state
Posted on 1/6/22 at 5:01 am
Posted on 1/6/22 at 5:01 am
Team in LA released.
He made honorable mention.
He made honorable mention.
17
Posted on 1/6/22 at 5:08 am to nicholastiger
They may not be considering future potential and are focusing on performance in high school.
Posted on 1/6/22 at 5:10 am to TBoy
LOL
Posted on 1/6/22 at 5:27 am to zoom
Some high school kids put up ridiculous numbers but don’t have nearly the future potential. Just look at the stat lines in MaxPreps. Manning isn’t in the top 10. Actually he’s all the way down at 31. While Manning has higher future potential, I can understand the difficulty in overlooking kids who played their best games in high school.
This post was edited on 1/6/22 at 5:29 am
Posted on 1/6/22 at 7:00 am to TBoy
Manning is highly ranked bc of his name
His arm is above average
But nothing he has done has him looking like a future #1 player.
His arm is above average
But nothing he has done has him looking like a future #1 player.
Posted on 1/6/22 at 7:03 am to nicholastiger
Howard is better than him
Posted on 1/6/22 at 7:24 am to luciouslou
By a lot
Stronger arm
Better athlete
And has actually shown that he can go through progressions.
Though he looked a lot worse once his go to Jack Bech was in BR.
Stronger arm
Better athlete
And has actually shown that he can go through progressions.
Though he looked a lot worse once his go to Jack Bech was in BR.
Posted on 1/6/22 at 7:52 am to BUGAtGOAT
Manning is highly ranked bc of his name.
I agree. Just like Max Johnson will not win a Super Bowl.
I agree. Just like Max Johnson will not win a Super Bowl.
Posted on 1/6/22 at 8:00 am to nicholastiger
I didn't think Eli was all that great coming out of high school, he just didn't seem to have the fire in him like Peyton. Boy was I wrong. I think it would be safe to say that Arch will be a very good QB in college.
Posted on 1/6/22 at 8:18 am to luciouslou
quote:
Howard is better than him
From what ive seen on both Howard is far better than Manning. Future looks bright
Posted on 1/6/22 at 8:20 am to nicholastiger
Came out blazing as what? A 9th grader or 10th, then has pretty much just been mehhhh. Not saying he won't be a good QB, but he will have to earn it, but his current ranking is because of his last name.
Posted on 1/6/22 at 8:21 am to zoom
Stats do not impress
Posted on 1/6/22 at 8:32 am to TBoy
I find it hard to believe he only threw for 1300 yards in a season. Very hard
I guess with maybe Ida they didn’t play as many games so it could be possible..
I guess with maybe Ida they didn’t play as many games so it could be possible..
This post was edited on 1/6/22 at 8:34 am
Posted on 1/6/22 at 8:37 am to TBoy
Those stats are from less than half of his games
Posted on 1/6/22 at 9:10 am to nicholastiger
First time following high school football?
Posted on 1/6/22 at 9:37 am to Mr Clean
quote:
Those stats are from less than half of his games
It is correct that the MaxPreps stats don't include all of his games. However, reporting is that he finished with just over 2,000 yards passing, which would put him somewhere close to the top 12 or so. USA Today
I'm not suggesting he isn't a good player or that he doesn't have serious upside potential in college or pro football. All I'm suggesting is that when these people who follow high school sports have to select who is the most valuable player in a given high school season, it becomes difficult to overlook a kid who put up 3,000 yards passing to give the award to a Manning who put up 1,000 fewer yards because the Manning has potential on the next level. They shouldn't be giving high school MVP awards to a player based on his college recruiting profile. Some of these high school kids who don't have the measurables to be attractive as recruits for D-1 quarterback have tremendous high school seasons. Therefore, they should get the high school awards.
Posted on 1/6/22 at 9:46 am to TBoy
DON’T BELIEVE THE HYPE!!
Posted on 1/6/22 at 9:47 am to Nissanmaxima
quote:
but his current ranking is because of his last name.
He’s gone from overrated to just flat out being disrespected as a prospect lol
Y’all are too lazy to even watch his film or what?
Posted on 1/6/22 at 9:53 am to Lester Earl
This thread is a non-story. High school awards, like all-state, are generally given based on on-the-field performance.
Recruiting rankings are based on potential.
The two do not necessarily agree.
There have been many situations where a highly recruited player was left off of all-state teams, in place of a guy who was not a college prospect at all, but had a better year on the prep level.
Recruiting rankings are based on potential.
The two do not necessarily agree.
There have been many situations where a highly recruited player was left off of all-state teams, in place of a guy who was not a college prospect at all, but had a better year on the prep level.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News