Started By
Message

re: Need help estimating usage cost for a whole house generator

Posted on 7/11/24 at 9:17 am to
Posted by RaginRampage
Detroit Lions Fan
Member since Feb 2018
221 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 9:17 am to
quote:

a generator runs at max RPM no matter the load you are pulling


If you're talking about a regular portable generator, and not an inverter. You would be correct to say is runs at a constant RPM, however, as load increase there will be a difference in fuel consumption, or else it will stall unless it is fed more fuel to handle the load and maintain that same RPM.

Edit: Remove bad info
This post was edited on 7/11/24 at 10:01 am
Posted by southern686
Narnia
Member since Nov 2015
989 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 9:18 am to
Ehh, I wouldn't say drastically. At least not for a whole home generator. I say this because most of the time, they are oversized for the house so loading them up so to say unless you have all electric appliances.

But yes, load surely effects it. I was just trying to explain, its not something you can really calculate or should worry about.
You would some sort of way have to figure out the gas burn rate of the generator VS load. Which even then burn rate V load wouldn't be proportional. Then you would need to determine what the load is of all electrical device's are. Then add up the load of said devices on X it by the burn rate of that load and youll know what its costing per hour/day/ etc.

Posted by RaginRampage
Detroit Lions Fan
Member since Feb 2018
221 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 9:21 am to
quote:

So around $40 a day


This is what the math says a 20 kW Generac should use at 50% load.

Fuel Consumption Data on Page 4

~ 200 cu.ft/hr / 100 Cu.ft./CCF * 24 = 48 CCF/Day * ~$0.91 /CCF = $44/Day
Posted by southern686
Narnia
Member since Nov 2015
989 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 9:25 am to
quote:

which assuming he's talking about a whole home generator and not a portable, it's likely an inverter.


Most all stand by generators I've seen are just conventional synchronous generators. Didn't even know they made inverter based stand bys which is pretty cool.
Posted by RaginRampage
Detroit Lions Fan
Member since Feb 2018
221 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Most all stand by generators I've seen are just conventional synchronous generators


Yes you are correct. I always assumed they were inverters since Generac claims <3% THD. Which is usually what you get with an inverter.

Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29002 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 10:31 am to
quote:

I’m just trying to do a more thorough cost/benefit analysis to an alternative.

Seems like it would be useful to know what to plan for during extended power outages, no?
I hear you, I'm the same way. But like others are saying, assuming typical use patterns of standby generators, fuel cost is a non-factor. Even if you have a week+ outage every year, fuel will never add up to more than a few % of TCO considering install cost and maintenance and such.

Can I ask what alternative(s) you are comparing to?
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
20115 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Ehh, I wouldn't say drastically.


Well, lets just look at the Generac linked. The fuel consumption increase from 50% load to 100% load is a 50% increase in fuel consumption. That seems pretty drastic. They dont provide idle consumption data but idle is probably going to be somewhere between 25% and 50% of the 50% load consumption.

So that would be a range of 100 ft^3/hr at idle and 300 ft^3/hr at 100% load.

very noticeable change in operating costs.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
20115 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Yes you are correct. I always assumed they were inverters since Generac claims <3% THD. Which is usually what you get with an inverter.


Even traditional rotating generators have THD ratings.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29002 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:01 am to
Just as a data point, I have a 22kw generac which states 228 ft^3/hr at 50% and 327 ft^3/hr at 100%. I have a real time gas flow sensor which measures ~70 ft^3/hr during a no-load exercise with a peak of ~200 ft^3/hr during startup.
Posted by poochie
Houma, la
Member since Apr 2007
6765 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Natural gas appears to be cheaper, but natural gas does not appear to be charged as kilowatt hours. Instead, I'm billed by a measure called centum cubic feet.

If my current electrical consumption is 50 kWh per day, how do I convert that to a consumption cost of a natural gas whole house stand-by generator where natural gas is measured by centum cubic feet?

The best tool I found just gave ccf estimates based on 4 tiers of load for each size generator. That is somewhat helpful, but not as precise as I would like.

What says the H&G?


just wanted to re-read this and confirm that you're WAY over thinking this...
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
43427 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:12 am to
he's either an engineer or an accountant
Posted by poochie
Houma, la
Member since Apr 2007
6765 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:36 am to
too technical for an accountant...
Posted by TheBoo
South to Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
5135 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

The fuel consumption increase from 50% load to 100% load is a 50% increase in fuel consumption. That seems pretty drastic.

Well sure, but you're not going to run a 22kw generator at a 100% load, or even close to that honestly, for anything more than very short periods of time. Realize that a 50% load on that generator is 12kw. That's huge.
This post was edited on 7/11/24 at 2:19 pm
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
20115 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Well sure, but you're not going to run a 22kw generator at a 100% load, or even close to that honestly, for anything more than very short periods of time. Realize that a 50% load on that generator is 12kw. That's huge.


That is a different topic. The point was fuel consumption can and does vary drastically with loading. So it does matter to evaluate the fuel consumption relevant for the expected loading.
This post was edited on 7/11/24 at 2:39 pm
Posted by TheBoo
South to Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
5135 posts
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

That is a different topic.

Not really. Sure, understanding the differences on paper matter, but If the goal is to understand overall fuel consumption costs, the only time you are getting even close 100% load is for the 1-2 seconds that your AC compressors are starting. 90% of the time you’ll be at below 50% on a generator that size.
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
12133 posts
Posted on 7/12/24 at 9:30 am to
quote:

90% of the time you’ll be at below 50% on a generator that size.


+1

Standby generators aren’t just sized for running amps. They have to be sized to handle the LRA current of starting compressors across-the-line. LRA can be 4-8x the full-load current rating of a motor. A larger generator has to be able to ride through that.

As an example, my 3 ton units typically run around 16A and 11A, respectively. If you do the math, my 20kW standby seems to be way oversized:

240V x 16A = 3840W
240V x 11A = 2640W

Total = 6480W
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
20115 posts
Posted on 7/12/24 at 9:44 am to
quote:

+1

Standby generators aren’t just sized for running amps. They have to be sized to handle the LRA current of starting compressors across-the-line. LRA can be 4-8x the full-load current rating of a motor. A larger generator has to be able to ride through that.

As an example, my 3 ton units typically run around 16A and 11A, respectively. If you do the math, my 20kW standby seems to be way oversized:

240V x 16A = 3840W
240V x 11A = 2640W

Total = 6480W


You dont have to oversize to completely handle starting current of the compressor with rotating generators. They can handle inrush above their amp ratings to an extent.

For example, you can start a 3-ton compressor on a 10kW generator. The 10kW gen only has a 42A full load rating but it can tolerate brief increases like motor starts.
This post was edited on 7/12/24 at 9:45 am
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22475 posts
Posted on 7/12/24 at 11:38 am to
Its always interesting it seems like the real time utility bills are always less than the math estimation on usage. I know that usage depends on load as discussed, but $30-40/ day seems low.
Posted by jmon
Loisiana
Member since Oct 2010
9286 posts
Posted on 7/12/24 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

$30-40/ day seems low


Real life experience says those numbers are pretty damn accurate.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29002 posts
Posted on 7/12/24 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Its always interesting it seems like the real time utility bills are always less than the math estimation on usage. I know that usage depends on load as discussed, but $30-40/ day seems low.
That's a bit lower than my typical cost too ($50-60/day), but the two biggest contributors to the number are your local gas prices and how much your AC is running.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram