- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1-on-1 debates on the poli board
Posted on 5/2/14 at 7:58 am
Posted on 5/2/14 at 7:58 am
This needs to happen. Every thread just spins its wheels because so many posters chime in and distract from the original debate between two posters.
It could be great if done right.
It could be great if done right.
Posted on 5/2/14 at 8:02 am to RidiculousHype

i think you are missing the point of a public message board.
Posted on 5/2/14 at 8:04 am to Displaced
quote:
i think you are missing the point of a public message board.
Not at all, I think 99% of threads should stay as they are.
I'm just talking about occasionally allowing two bonafide posters go at it on an issue. Usually what happens is a good debate between two posters starts, and then 10 other people chime in and everyone starts chasing rabbits.
Posted on 5/2/14 at 8:06 am to RidiculousHype
quote:
allowing two bonafide posters go at it on an issue.
who determines these two posters? why are their opinions that much more valid than everyone elses?
Posted on 5/2/14 at 8:16 am to Displaced
quote:
who determines these two posters?
You could have other posters nominate the combatants and then take a vote. At first you could start with one debate a week and see how it goes.
quote:
why are their opinions that much more valid than everyone elses?
They're not. But for the same reason that some people are asked to debate on TV, two debaters just brings more clarity.
Posted on 5/2/14 at 5:59 pm to RidiculousHype
The only one with the power to do this, ie restrict a thread to two posters are Chicken and Circus Child and I've never seen them do this. Would be the first thunderdome I've witnessed on this site.
Posted on 5/2/14 at 6:01 pm to Displaced
quote:
who determines these two posters?
The admins and owners of TD
quote:
why are their opinions that much more valid than everyone elses?
Because they run this place.
Posted on 5/2/14 at 6:07 pm to RidiculousHype
Will this be done on the music board too? Because I would pay good money to see a Phish vs Drake thunderdome
Posted on 5/2/14 at 8:29 pm to RidiculousHype
You mean 95% of Poli Board posters vs. Rex debates?
Posted on 5/3/14 at 9:19 am to Kafka
quote:
Because I would pay good money to see a Phish vs Drake thunderdome

Posted on 5/3/14 at 8:57 pm to Sentrius
quote:
Would be the first thunderdome I've witnessed on this site.
They original thounderdome roll out didn't last long...
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:11 pm to RidiculousHype
i'd be happy to take on any of you clowns. i already destroyed Zach on the death penalty but granted that's not much to brag about.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:23 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
i'd be happy to take on any of you clowns.

Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:33 am to RidiculousHype
I've been lobbying for a TD thunderdome for quite some time now.
Two men enter. One man leaves
Two men enter. One man leaves
Posted on 5/5/14 at 9:53 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
i'd be happy to take on any of you clowns.
I'll take that challenge on the subject of Benghazi, and I won't cast one personal insult along the way.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 2:33 pm to RidiculousHype
I am generally in favor of thunderdomes in most situations. I wish some variant of thunderdomes could be utilized in our legal system some kind of way.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 4:14 pm to RidiculousHype
I'd support this if there was a time limit and the person with the most down votes at the end got a week ban. 3 bans and its lifetime. Would shut a bunch of people who think they know it all up.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:59 pm to Breesus
quote:
I'd support this if there was a time limit and the person with the most down votes at the end got a week ban. 3 bans and its lifetime. Would shut a bunch of people who think they know it all up.
this will definitely tone down the groupthink echo chamber that is the td.com poliboard

Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:35 pm to RidiculousHype
Popular
Back to top
