- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Amount of protein in one sitting
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:29 am to lsu777
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:29 am to lsu777
quote:
must be in a caloric surplus to build muscle. not a huge one, but still in one.
No you don't. You can be in a small deficit and still build muscle. It may not be the most efficient way to build muscle, depending on the person and their goals, but it absolutely can be done and is done often. You don't "have to" be in a surplus. For the person already in extremely good shape, it would be a lot harder to do as they are already very lean. For the average person though, it isn't difficult at all.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 11:36 am
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:54 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
it can absolutely be done
only if you are novice, coming back from long layoff, mobidly obese or juicing.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:56 am to OGtigerfan87
quote:
Got ya and I don't know if this matters but I'm not sure I was clear in my goal. Not trying to bulk up, just build and tone some lean muscle as I lose weight/fat. Lookin for a leaner and tone look not really trying to get "swole"
then do this
250 calorie deficit w/1g protein per lbs of bodyweight
greyskull lp as your lifting program
finish each lifitng day with 10 min of conditioning from the Greyskull Viking conditioning books
10k steps per day.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:57 am to lsu777
quote:
only if you are novice, coming back from long layoff, mobidly obese or juicing.
Incorrect.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:58 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
No you don't. You can be in a small deficit and still build muscle. It may not be the most efficient way to build muscle, depending on the person and their goals, but it absolutely can be done and is done often. You don't "have to" be in a surplus. For the person already in extremely good shape, it would be a lot harder to do as they are already very lean. For the average person though, it isn't difficult at all.
so in other words one of the exception i put. If you are a novice, coming off long layoff, obese or juicing
sure
but if oyu are at 15% bodyfat, been lifitng for 2-3 years, you cant go recomp on a caloric deficit.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 12:03 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Incorrect.
the hell it isnt. believe what you want though.
LINK
quote:
Building muscle in a calorie deficit (body recomposition) is possible, particularly for beginners, overweight individuals, or those returning from a break. Studies show that a moderate deficit (approx. 500 kcal/day) combined with high protein intake (1.6-2.2g/kg) and resistance training can lead to fat loss and muscle gain
quote:
studies confirm that building muscle while in a calorie deficit—a process known as body recomposition—is possible, though it becomes increasingly difficult as the deficit grows larger or as training experience increases
again...if you are experienced....gonna be next to impossible and we have lots of studies that show this. but believe what you want not gonna sit here and argue.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 12:08 pm to lsu777
I mean, the link you just posted is arguing exactly what i've said. The problem is you are speaking in absolutes, where the study is not. You said it can only be done in a surplus unless you are in those specific groups. That study shows that is not the case and everyone can build muscle in a deficit, it just works better for some groups more than others, which is no different than any other method.
As I also said, it may not be the most efficient method to build muscle, however that doesn't not mean it can't be done as you've implied. It is far easier to build muscle in a calorie deficit if you are very new to resistance training/very overweight, etc but that is a very different statement than you can only do it if you are in those groups. It is just bad advice to say it can't be done, especially without knowing the individual circumstances and state of the person asking the question. There have been many studies that have shown that it is not a requirement, like everything in fitness it depends on the magnitude and th person.
As I also said, it may not be the most efficient method to build muscle, however that doesn't not mean it can't be done as you've implied. It is far easier to build muscle in a calorie deficit if you are very new to resistance training/very overweight, etc but that is a very different statement than you can only do it if you are in those groups. It is just bad advice to say it can't be done, especially without knowing the individual circumstances and state of the person asking the question. There have been many studies that have shown that it is not a requirement, like everything in fitness it depends on the magnitude and th person.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 3/19/26 at 12:48 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
I mean, the link you just posted is arguing exactly what i've said. The problem is you are speaking in absolutes, where the study is not. You said it can only be done in a surplus unless you are in those specific groups. That study shows that is not the case and everyone can build muscle in a deficit, it just works better for some groups more than others, which is no different than any other method.
As I also said, it may not be the most efficient method to build muscle, however that doesn't not mean it can't be done as you've implied. It is far easier to build muscle in a calorie deficit if you are very new to resistance training/very overweight, etc but that is a very different statement than you can only do it if you are in those groups. It is just bad advice to say it can't be done, especially without knowing the individual circumstances and state of the person asking the question. There have been many studies that have shown that it is not a requirement, like everything in fitness it depends on the magnitude and th person.
if you have ever tried to do it....its almost impossible. you have to stay pretty much perfect with diet/training/ sleep/recovery that for 99.99% of cases its impossible.
the op could but its pretty much impossible to build any real amount of muscle outside of those 4 cases i mentioned.
it just leads to spinning your wheels and not getting anywhere and frustration.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:06 pm to lsu777
quote:
the op could
He’s 230# & eating 1300cals. He ain’t building shite lol
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:13 pm to lsu777
quote:
it just leads to spinning your wheels and not getting anywhere and frustration.
This pretty much sums it up.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:13 am to Schmelly
While I def came here as an admitted novice it is apparent to even me that some of your are confusing bulking with building/gaining lean muscle. I'm talking about replacing body fat with some muscle not getting huge or pumped up. Dr. Idz whose is one of the internet fitness experts I actually respect, stands by that total calories has zero to do with building muscle and to say it does shows a complete lack of understanding of the science/physics behind the process. He backs up his stance with science/research explaining how it is a signal dependent process not an energy dependent process and those signals are strength/resistance training and eating the correct/large amounts of protein. Those things send the signals to your muscle to grow not excess calories. I'll be honest I've seen good results on this current fitness journey so far following his science based advice and I really only started this thread to see what people's opinion was on 75g of protein in 1 sitting lol.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 9:15 am
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:47 am to Schmelly
Schmelly that looks like the Jordan Syatt way. 
Posted on 3/20/26 at 10:07 am to OGtigerfan87
quote:
Dr. Idz whose is one of the internet fitness experts I actually respect, stands by that total calories has zero to do with building muscle and to say it does shows a complete lack of understanding of the science/physics behind the process. He backs up his stance with science/research explaining how it is a signal dependent process not an energy dependent process and those signals are strength/resistance training and eating the correct/large amounts of protein. Those things send the signals to your muscle to grow not excess calories.
All that I’ve read on this basically agrees. But you need to eat the right amount of calories, not necessarily a surplus. Their argument was can you build muscle in a deficit or not. In a deficit your body will prioritize using protein for other necessary functions as opposed to muscle protein synthesis. So it is more difficult (but not impossible given certain conditions) to build muscle in a deficit.
That’s my understanding. Anyone, please correct me if I’m wrong.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:02 am to PillageUrVillage
quote:
That’s my understanding. Anyone, please correct me if I’m wrong.
That's the correct understanding. It may not be the most efficient way to build muscle to "maximize" muscle gains, but it absolutely can be done and pretty much every study out there shows this. Like everything though, there are limits and diminishing returns. If you are in an extreme deficit (more than 500 calories per day or so), the muscle gains start drastically declining. Similarly with going in a surplus, they've shown that there isn't much benefit to your muscle gains above roughly 10% over maintenance, at that point you just start storing fat and your muscle gains don't really go up at any higher rate.
Stay under a 500 calorie deficit per day and make sure you get all your protein in, and you can gain muscle and lose body fat while in a healthy calorie deficit.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 2:14 pm
Popular
Back to top


1







