Started By
Message

re: Anyone checking out 007 First Light today?

Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:05 am to
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
40243 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:05 am to
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54887 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 11:31 am to
This game looks terrible. I saw something this morning about the stealth missions.

If you are caught, it doesn't fail. He just says an excuse to the npc and he continues on
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4771 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 1:31 am to
I’ll stick to playing GoldenEye on the N64

Remember how there used to be a time when video games were about the gameplay and not the graphics or presentation?

Seems like a foreign concept now to most people.
This post was edited on 5/31/26 at 1:33 am
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
32967 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 11:27 am to
quote:

I’ll stick to playing GoldenEye on the N64 Remember how there used to be a time when video games were about the gameplay and not the graphics or presentation? Seems like a foreign concept now to most people.

This just isn’t reflective of reality. People have been breathlessly talking about graphical fidelity in games for over three decades. Then, as now, the most popular games aren’t the most graphic intensive. The media just likes to talk about graphics as it’s far easier than talking about the merits of the game itself.
Posted by CornDogCologne
Mental Defective
Member since Nov 2007
8933 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 11:32 am to
a major selling point of the n64 were as follows: 3d graphics, 64 bits rather than 32, and an upgrade to 'realism'. to our 2026 eyes, it looks like microwaved dogshit, but back then, it was very much marketed on its fidelity.
This post was edited on 5/31/26 at 11:33 am
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69695 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 11:38 am to
Really? I've heard nothing but good things. 91 on Steam from over 7,300 reviews and 87 on metacritic.
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4771 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

to our 2026 eyes, it looks like microwaved dogshit, but back then, it was very much marketed on its fidelity. to our 2026 eyes, it looks like microwaved dogshit, but back then, it was very much marketed on its fidelity.


Goldeneye has infinitely more re-playability than 95% of FPS shooters that come out now
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4771 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

This just isn’t reflective of reality. People have been breathlessly talking about graphical fidelity in games for over three decades. Then, as now, the most popular games aren’t the most graphic intensive. The media just likes to talk about graphics as it’s far easier than talking about the merits of the game itself.


What you’re saying isn’t reflective of reality at all

AAA video games now have become nothing more than high-graphical interactive movies where you have prolonged cutscenes that derail the flow of the gameplay.
Posted by CornDogCologne
Mental Defective
Member since Nov 2007
8933 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 1:51 pm to
It was a good game of its era and it was received as such.

I’m not sure why people want to point at a 30 year old game in a totally different genre to issue criticism.

I wish studios had more flexibility to try new things in the modern era, but goldeneye is such nostalgia bait that I don’t know that people who played it at its height can judge it objectively.
This post was edited on 5/31/26 at 1:53 pm
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
32967 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

What you’re saying isn’t reflective of reality at all AAA video games now have become nothing more than high-graphical interactive movies where you have prolonged cutscenes that derail the flow of the gameplay.

So we aren’t actually talking about “games” or “people”, but the mythic “AAA games”. Would you please define “AAA game/studio” for the sake of this discussion?
Posted by TheNameIsDalton
Huntsville
Member since Mar 2021
1558 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:44 pm to
It is straight up nostalgia, gamers today are incredibly spoiled.
Posted by DVA Tailgater
Bunkie
Member since Jan 2011
3484 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 7:17 pm to
Man, this game rules. Everything good from 60+ years of Bond all in one game.
Posted by CornDogCologne
Mental Defective
Member since Nov 2007
8933 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 5:57 pm to
I beat it earlier this week. I thought it was a decent origin story for Bond set in a modern day setting that made enough sense without any overt preachy modern day themes thrown in. Greenway and Q were both good supporting cast members.

It would have been nice if IO had the ability to make the exploration sections as open ended as their hitman missions, but what we got was fine.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84447 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 6:49 pm to
It's called 007 because that is how many minutes of gameplay you get amongst 9 hours of cinematics
Posted by carrguitar
Member since Oct 2014
979 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 7:22 pm to
While i dont agree with his summation of the game being not much play and too many cutscenes….that video had me rolling lol
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84447 posts
Posted on 6/7/26 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

While i dont agree with his summation of the game being not much play and too many cutscenes….that video had me rolling lol

I haven't played the game, Fleek is just hilarious
Posted by j1897
Member since Nov 2011
4685 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:24 am to
quote:

got was fine.


Bout 80 percent done, and fine is the best description i have. Not sure i'll finish, definitely not worth 70 dollars.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram