Started By
Message

re: The slave who taught Jack Daniels how to make whiskey

Posted on 6/29/16 at 9:19 am to
Posted by Jack Daniel
Gold member
Member since Feb 2013
29731 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 9:19 am to
It's not true guys. Trust me.
Posted by BlackenedOut
The Big Sleazy
Member since Feb 2011
6075 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 9:53 am to
I had a similar thought when I read the Sunday NYT this week. It was on Page 1 below the fold, but still. A big whiskey company, which has been losing some ground as bourbon has risen in prominence, drops a "bombshell" revelation. The NYT, which has an affinity for stories with a particular viewpoint, runs it.

At one point in the story someone points out, "Jack Daniels soared in the 80s because it tied its branding to yuppies, now it is trying to do the same with millenials."

Most telling part of the whole story? Whether or not to reveal the slave origin story of Jack Daniels is left up to the discretion of the guide.

Marketing fluff.
Posted by unclebuck504
N.O./B.R./ATL
Member since Feb 2010
1716 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 9:54 am to
Why does it matter if it's true or not? Who gives a sh!t?

A "marketing ploy?" ... yeah, I see all kinds of black people, liberals and hipsters running to buy Jack now ... not.

The fact that some of you are getting wound up about this is very telling.
This post was edited on 6/29/16 at 10:01 am
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64617 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Why does it matter if it's true or not?


Well, it's a somewhat interesting topic to discuss as a distraction from other things.

quote:

Who gives a sh!t?


Well, brah, you're discussing it, so I'd say you do.

quote:

A "marketing ploy?" ... yeah, I see all kinds of black people, liberals and hipsters running to buy Jack now ... not.


Let me guess...you don't work in marketing, right?

quote:

The fact that some of you are getting wound up about this is very telling.


You're the only one that seems mad in this thread.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64617 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 11:45 am to
quote:

the Sunday NYT this week


It's a shell of its former self. I used to enjoy reading it every weekend.
Posted by BlackenedOut
The Big Sleazy
Member since Feb 2011
6075 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 12:19 pm to
I love reading it as a ritual. But jesus every week there is a long entry about something maybe, perhaps shady Trump did at some point and an overly twee Sam Sifton recipe.

The travel section is still bad arse at least.
Posted by unclebuck504
N.O./B.R./ATL
Member since Feb 2010
1716 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 1:43 pm to
I don't need to work in marketing to understand the consumer habits of certain demographics. This story, even if it's true, actually doesn't make hipsetrs, Democrats, liberals, or blacks want to drink Jack.

The hipsters drink kombucha. If they're drinking liquor, it has to be some oddball sh!t that nobody heard of. Jack is too mainstream for hipsters.

African Americans aren't going to start drinking the sh!t because of them "finally admitting" a slave contributed to it's creation. If anything they'll try to BOYCOTT the stuff as payback for 150 years of "cultural appropriation." If you want to market it to African Americans you need a Hip-Hop artist to rap about it.

To be honest, most black people will NEVER drink the stuff. Just something about the name LYNCHburg turns them off (even though the name has nothing to do with people being lynched).

Average white non-hipster Democrats and liberals MIGHT drink Jack based on marketing, but only if they know that it would really piss off some Republicans.

Posted by Jackalope
Paris. (Austin Native)
Member since Apr 2009
2252 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 1:51 pm to
U mad bro
Posted by unclebuck504
N.O./B.R./ATL
Member since Feb 2010
1716 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 2:10 pm to
Naw, not mad at all.

Seems like you and a few other guys are a little upset that someone had the audacity to associate Jack Daniel's with a slave. Then you immediately jump to discredit it as a "marketing ploy." LMAO

Personally, I find it funny as hell. I don't even drink Jack. I got no horse in the race ... I could not possibly care less who was involved in it's creation. I just find it down right hilarious that some of you are acting like it's part of an overwhelming racial conspiracy ... for the record, I think the story is bullsh!t.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64617 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

This story, even if it's true, actually doesn't make hipsetrs, Democrats, liberals, or blacks want to drink Jack.


You're the only one in this thread talking about these particular groups.

Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64617 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Seems like you and a few other guys are a little upset that someone had the audacity to associate Jack Daniel's with a slave.


You are, literally, the only one in this thread that is upset.
Posted by unclebuck504
N.O./B.R./ATL
Member since Feb 2010
1716 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 2:44 pm to
Jackelope was the one accusing people of being either black and/or a liberal.

I added in the Democrats and hipsters.

So who exactly is this "marketing ploy" targeting to get to drink Jack?
This post was edited on 6/29/16 at 2:45 pm
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58632 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

All to serve a marketing purpose. And right now, the anti-white privilege/pro-black marketing campaign is in vogue
reading the title of this thread this is the first thing that popped in my mind. Reading the article i didnt see any real evidence that this was a true story.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64617 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

So who exactly is this "marketing ploy" targeting to get to drink Jack?


Posted by unclebuck504
N.O./B.R./ATL
Member since Feb 2010
1716 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 4:10 pm to
What, you can't answer a simple question?

Who are you, Donald Trump?
This post was edited on 6/29/16 at 4:11 pm
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64617 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

What, you can't answer a simple question?


The question is stupid and is based on erroneous assumptions.

The very fact that this story put out by Jack has someone named unclebuck, who claims to "have no dog in the fight" and who couldn't "care less" about Jack, thinking about Jack to the extent that it is causing him to make multiple posts about Jack in this thread speaks to the efficacy of the marketing initiative.
Posted by unclebuck504
N.O./B.R./ATL
Member since Feb 2010
1716 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 5:33 pm to
Look man, that stupidity might work for you over on the Political Talk board or the OT, but you can miss me with that bullsh!t.

Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64617 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

Look man, that stupidity might work for you over on the Political Talk board or the OT, but you can miss me with that bullsh!t.


I'd say their marketing initiative is working wonders. You can't stop thinking about them!
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74913 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 5:49 pm to
Posted by unclebuck504
N.O./B.R./ATL
Member since Feb 2010
1716 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 6:00 pm to
No, I can't stop laughing at your dumb arse.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram