- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PuttaDaForkDown
Posted on 5/9/11 at 8:31 pm to ChenierauTigre
Posted on 5/9/11 at 8:31 pm to ChenierauTigre
quote:
I'm gonna beat y'all to goal.
Nope focused like a laser beam from this point until 185. Full Hermit mode and I am going to be heading back into full induction when my current supplies run out.
Posted on 5/10/11 at 6:18 am to ChenierauTigre
170/155/150
I've been on a phlegm based diet since Sunday evening. Starting Mucinex DM today. Hope to break the latest nonplateau this week.
I've been on a phlegm based diet since Sunday evening. Starting Mucinex DM today. Hope to break the latest nonplateau this week.
Posted on 5/10/11 at 7:00 am to Benchwarmer
Mmmmmm. That sounds yummy.
Hope you get better soon. 
Posted on 5/10/11 at 7:17 am to igoringa
quote:
Are you saying you ate approximately 8000 'extra' calories (or are you saying the computer calorie count is wrong)?
i have no idea how much i ate but the point is when you do that much work your body screams for food and its tough to regulate or 'count calories' at that point. i never felt remotely full...all i know is i couldn't move my legs because of cramping and charlie horses and i was eating to get myself to the point where i could stand up and ride my bike back to my hotel.
the computer is correct..its based off my wattage from my powermeter so those calories are accurate.
i'm 195 today..still droppiong some of the excess fluid and 'travel' weight from being in the car. i'll give it a couple more days to settle down but i stand by my earlier assertion regarding cardio.
the guys who burns 100,000+ calories in the tDF don't brag about losing 10lbs over that same time period. their weight generally stays constant at the beginning and end of the Tour and i think you could hardly look at them and call them fat pigs.
simply put; a tiny bit of intervals/exercise (less than 20 minutes) + eating sensibly is the way to lose weight.
there's NO benefit (see my sig) to these long efforts because your body will be begging for calories and you'll end up at par despite your best efforts to eat 'less' than you burned. its impossible.
just pointing out the obvious again.
This post was edited on 5/10/11 at 7:22 am
Posted on 5/10/11 at 7:21 am to Benchwarmer
quote:
its because i was destroyed and kept eating after the rides.
so remember this the next time someone says massive cardio will help you lose weight
I have typed and erased 3 replies because this seems to be an oxymoron considering the previous posts and replies.
which part? the part about eating after putting in a massive cardio effort or that long cardio sessions are a "good" way to lose weight?
Posted on 5/10/11 at 7:24 am to TigerMyth36
quote:
Nope focused like a laser beam from this point until 185. Full Hermit mode and I am going to be heading back into full induction when my current supplies run out.
thank you myth! you and i illustrate the cardio 'myth' better than a library full of books on the subject.
i've gone into EXTREME EXERCISE mode because racing season is in full force..and myth has gone into EXTREME WEIGHT LOSS mode and he's a good 8-9lbs ahead of me.
to catch up with him i'll have to 'dial back' on the exercise.
so haters... stfu
Posted on 5/10/11 at 7:41 am to ChenierauTigre
220/214.5/150 going back to induction foods. Thought I could eat taco soup but apparently corn tomatoes and black beans even in half the quantity I usually use had enough carbs to increase my blood sugar 20 points above what I had been averaging. I am sure that explains the no weight loss as well. Still in ketosis though. I think I may need to focus on calories this week as well because I am staying in ketosis but no weight loss. Did not go to the gym over the weekend either so I need to get at least some walking in.
Posted on 5/10/11 at 8:38 am to madamsquirrel
quote:
220/214.5/150 going back to induction foods. Thought I could eat taco soup but apparently corn tomatoes and black beans even in half the quantity I usually use had enough carbs to increase my blood sugar 20 points above what I had been averaging. I am sure that explains the no weight loss as well. Still in ketosis though. I think I may need to focus on calories this week as well because I am staying in ketosis but no weight loss. Did not go to the gym over the weekend either so I need to get at least some walking in.
It was probably the corn. Corn has a lot of starch (carbs) in it
Posted on 5/10/11 at 8:38 am to CAD703X
quote:
simply put; a tiny bit of intervals/exercise (less than 20 minutes) + eating sensibly is the way to lose weight.
Why are you always so 'definitive' (Not taking a shot but it just discounts your view IMO. The very person you sig quote on her blog specifically says cardio has some benefit (although it not as effective in her and a lot of peoples opinion as HIIT). There is an enormous difference in 'not as effective' vs the only way or 'useless'.
quote:
there's NO benefit (see my sig) to these long efforts because your body will be begging for calories and you'll end up at par despite your best efforts to eat 'less' than you burned. its impossible.
It impossible? So no one in the history of the universe has ever lost weight due to these long efforts? You completely discount yourself when you constantly pull to such an extreme. Is it optimal? Probably not. But can people lose weight doing cardio +30 minutes. Yes. Millions have. I provided you studies on that, but you ignored them and focused solely on the one that supported your position.
For example, you told a story about you and the two girls a few weeks back where you burned 1000 calories. They celebrated by eating 2500 calories in Mexican while you had a light beer. Are you saying you did not gain any benefit? Sounds to me like you did the IMPOSSIBLE and held off in eating.
Further, and I am more convinced then not in the benefits of HIIT (repeat I am more convinced then not in the benefits of HIIT), BUT the very study that started it all with HIIT (Prof Tremblay at Laval in 1994 stated in their conclusion: For a given level of energy expenditure, a high intensity training program induces a greater loss of subcutaneous fat compared with a training program of moderate intensity. It is obvious that high intensity exercise cannot be prescribed for individuals at risk for health problems or for obese people who are not used to exercise. In these cases, the most prudent course remains a low intensity exercise program with a progressive increase in duration and frequency of sessions."
Well when you read what the experts in HIIT argue is needed to get into sufficient shape they tend to get people started on... low intensity cardio. For the obese, they recommend low intensity cardio (and they dont say it is a complete waste of time/useless effort).
quote:
just pointing out the obvious again.
Until you moderate your 'completely useless' and 'impossible' comments and expand beyond anectdotal samples of 1 or 2, you are not going to come across as terribly convincing (although I do feel in a lot of ways from what I have read on the topic you are much more right then wrong).
Just my 2 cents
Posted on 5/10/11 at 8:43 am to TigerMyth36
quote:
I just can't stand people that tell me I did it wrong when I have been able to maintain my diet for 14 months and lost 133 pounds and yes now I ride 10 to 15 miles 5 days a week.
TigerMyth36,
I hear you and why you may be frustrated by this. As a heads up, you may notice that the same thing is being said on the other side of the debate also though. The words useless, wrong etc... are being thrown around about methods that some people are using to success. You get brought into some of those conversations as an exhibit A. Just saying, the shite flies both ways (not by you but by the self imposed masters of everything in this thread).
Posted on 5/10/11 at 8:46 am to igoringa
309.5/280/200 started 4/9
Another 4 pound week. I was worried as my diet piece of the puzzle had many failures including the weekend. Luckily completely useless cardio provided some benefit.
Another 4 pound week. I was worried as my diet piece of the puzzle had many failures including the weekend. Luckily completely useless cardio provided some benefit.
Posted on 5/10/11 at 9:04 am to madamsquirrel
I was craving tacos last night, so I decided I would make a taco salad. Ground beef, cheese, lettuce, onions, sour cream, a few black olives, some zero carb taco sauce I found, a little zero carb hot sauce, and of course, the taco seasoning. Nothing bad there, so I'm thinking this will be a great meal and very Atkins friendly.
I brown the beef and start to put in the seasoning packet. Luckily, I glanced at the nutritional information. That little packet of seasoning has between 24 and 30 carbs depending on whether you are eating mild, hot, or regular (can't remember which was which). One packet seasons 1 lb of beef, so if i eat 1/4 lb on my salad, that's up to 7.5 grams of carbs......just for the seasoning. I probably eat closer to 1/2 lb, so we're up to 15 grams and nearing my daily limit.
I can't believe they put that much filler in a seasoning mix. Oh well, I decided to mix my own and it tasted better anyway.
I brown the beef and start to put in the seasoning packet. Luckily, I glanced at the nutritional information. That little packet of seasoning has between 24 and 30 carbs depending on whether you are eating mild, hot, or regular (can't remember which was which). One packet seasons 1 lb of beef, so if i eat 1/4 lb on my salad, that's up to 7.5 grams of carbs......just for the seasoning. I probably eat closer to 1/2 lb, so we're up to 15 grams and nearing my daily limit.
I can't believe they put that much filler in a seasoning mix. Oh well, I decided to mix my own and it tasted better anyway.
Posted on 5/10/11 at 9:23 am to BhamTigah
There's a reason the ingerdient font is so hard to read, especially on things that are "Lite" "low Carb" Multi-grain, low-fat
Posted on 5/10/11 at 9:37 am to BhamTigah
quote:
I can't believe they put that much filler in a seasoning mix. Oh well, I decided to mix my own and it tasted better anyway.
Oh yes most definitely. Some of that is probably to thicken it up.
Posted on 5/10/11 at 10:12 am to Hulkklogan
I knew to avoid the seasoning pack. Way better to mix your own spices. I figured my calories for breakfast and what I planned to eat for lunch and I may not be eating enough calories. The first week when I lost (today ends week 2) I was eating more so I may have to add in a few more calories. And not eat taco soup lol
Posted on 5/10/11 at 10:18 am to igoringa
quote:
igoringa
i guess i'm trying to steer people away from the mindset that losing weight has to be hard and that long cardio efforts do anything for you.
they really don't. let me say that again:
THEY REALLY DON'T
here's why; its your RPE or "rate of percieved effort". (this will come into play below)
you cite my comment about the biking with the 2 women and my ability to 'do the impossible'. ok, a couple of things on that:
a. i have been in weightloss mode for quite some time and had a little more of a mental mindset to only have a beer while steaming plates of fajitas and everyone around me is diping chips into cheese sauce and delicious frosty margaritas are being consumed like water in the desert. how many people do you think could do the same thing i did in that situation? hell you think i could keep that kind of willpower up if we did that 3 days in a row? oh hell no. pass the fricking chips and cheese dude. i'm going in.
b. i might have gained...***ONE*** pound of weightloss benefit. maybe. probably not because i technically worked off 1000 calories and it takes 3500 to burn the equivalent of a pound.
--------------------------------
Let me give you an example to make this even more clear; and again I'm citing what happens in the 'real world'. not some fantasy world where peope routinely workout for 1-2 hours a day and religiously don't eat the amount of food to put them on par.
Here you go, lets say someone is burning 2400 calories over a 24 hour period by just sitting around the house (to make this a round number).
Now that person goes and does a hard treadmill workout for an hour. Or what they think is hard. Or rather they're in the 'fat burning zone' which puts their heartrate somewhere around 130-140bpm. an hour is hard stuff. you'll be bored out of your freaking mind, you'll sweat like a pig..and if you're not in shape when you get off that treadmill you're gonna feel like you just ran a marathon.
disagree with anything i've said so far?
ok, follow me:
now you're hungry (come on..real world here..99% of the people are going to want to eat after an hour on a treadmill).
let's say you were DISCIPLINED and *only* ate 2 slices of pizza afterward. hell, lets say you were SUPER-DISCIPLINED and only ate a couple of handfuls of nuts and drank water.
either of those 2 things would be hard to do after an hour on a freaking treadmill. that builds an appetite and its hard (at least for me) to stop at 2 slices of pizza when i'm feeling worn out and hungry.
NOW FOR THE MATH:
you just burned 600 calories for an hour on a treadmill (look it up..thats abour averge).
you would have burned 100 calories (2400/24) by just sitting still over that same time period.
So that's a net gain 500 additional calories burned.
Now you just ate 2 pieces of pizza (which would take me about 41 seconds total to wolf down) that come in at 600 calories.
Or..you were "good" and only ate 2 handfuls of nuts..which..wait for it...also comes in around 600 calories.
so guess what? you just ate more than you exercised.
on top of that..you're still hungry. YES YOU ARE. no one who just ran for an hour is going to stop at 2 slices of pizza.
So there's my point. The treadmill was an exercise in futility (insanity, sisphyus pushing boulder up a mountain, etc.) and you actually did more harm than good.
NOW FOR THE MONEY PITCH
honestly igoringa, how the hell do you then take what just happened above..and repeat for another 364 days..and think this is in any way going to result in any measurable weight loss?
your rpe (above) will always make you "feel" you have done more than you actually have..and within a minute or 2..you've undone 60 minutes of hard work.
how about you just stick to doing what you already do (watching tv, folding clothes, etc) and simply eat LESS. its a frick-OF-ALOT easier.
your honor, i rest my case
This post was edited on 5/10/11 at 10:27 am
Posted on 5/10/11 at 10:34 am to CAD703X
ps igorina,
keep in mind there are WONDERFUL benefits of cardio. i couldnt ride up a mountain like a bat-out-of-hell if i wasnt out for FREAKING HOURS A WEEK on my bike.
my point (and sig) is that this is not a tool that will have any bearing on long term weight loss. it simply doesn't help (see previous page). there are much MUCH easier ways to lose weight, long cardio simply wont work due the dynamic i pointed out.
keep in mind there are WONDERFUL benefits of cardio. i couldnt ride up a mountain like a bat-out-of-hell if i wasnt out for FREAKING HOURS A WEEK on my bike.
my point (and sig) is that this is not a tool that will have any bearing on long term weight loss. it simply doesn't help (see previous page). there are much MUCH easier ways to lose weight, long cardio simply wont work due the dynamic i pointed out.
This post was edited on 5/10/11 at 10:36 am
Back to top



2





