- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PuttaDaForkDown
Posted on 4/28/11 at 8:46 pm to Benchwarmer
Posted on 4/28/11 at 8:46 pm to Benchwarmer
hulk..if u can keep doing that you're gold. thats all you need to do. just dont strain anything and mess up your exercising.
Posted on 4/28/11 at 8:50 pm to igoringa
quote:
I am doing WW, but the new point plus just freaking pisses me off beyond no end. Just sayin... it does.
Just curious - what pisses you off about it? I've loved it...
Posted on 4/28/11 at 8:59 pm to Lloyd Braun
1). The reduction in point value from old system (increase in allotment doesn't make up for it).
2). The free veg and fruit doesn't benefit me as I don't eat much fruit (I know they want me too).
3). The fiber reduction took away a lot of my staples (ie. Fiber one bars went from 3 pts for 2 to 4 points for one).
4). They still are anti-fats bigtime (ie more the caloric adjustment). You could use all your points on ranch (not that you would) and you would barely hit 1000 calories for the day.
That being said, the wife does it and it provides structure
2). The free veg and fruit doesn't benefit me as I don't eat much fruit (I know they want me too).
3). The fiber reduction took away a lot of my staples (ie. Fiber one bars went from 3 pts for 2 to 4 points for one).
4). They still are anti-fats bigtime (ie more the caloric adjustment). You could use all your points on ranch (not that you would) and you would barely hit 1000 calories for the day.
That being said, the wife does it and it provides structure
Posted on 4/28/11 at 9:35 pm to igoringa
Gotcha. My points went from 32 on the old to 43 on the new - didn't feel like much of an adjustment. But I don't eat a lot of carby stuff - which is seemed to go up in points values the most. Lean protein stayed the same. I don't feel like the points go up much with fat - moreso with a high carb count.
When fiber made such a big difference in points values, it was funny to see how many grocery items were made with added fiber - which I don't believe is as beneficial health-wise as naturally occurring fiber is.
The WW message boards are super helpful and give awesome tips on menu improvement, etc. - just thought I'd pass that on.
When fiber made such a big difference in points values, it was funny to see how many grocery items were made with added fiber - which I don't believe is as beneficial health-wise as naturally occurring fiber is.
The WW message boards are super helpful and give awesome tips on menu improvement, etc. - just thought I'd pass that on.
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:11 pm to Lloyd Braun
Whoa, wait. Your points are 42? Plus your 49 floaters?
I have been giving myself 35 (never officially signed back up - wife did), and I looked on line at boards and had figured 35.
If you don't mind sharing.... I weigh 285 right now.... Am I in your ballpark? No wonder why I may hate it lol
I have been giving myself 35 (never officially signed back up - wife did), and I looked on line at boards and had figured 35.
If you don't mind sharing.... I weigh 285 right now.... Am I in your ballpark? No wonder why I may hate it lol
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:37 pm to igoringa
I started at 42 or 43 - am down to 40 now (lost a point with approx. each 6-8 lbs of loss). Did your wife get the points+ calculator (little blue plastic one)? If so, you can reset it by punching the button the back and put in your stats to get your points.
At 285 and a man (I'm assuming), the only way you'd have 35 points is if you were like 80
How old and tall are you? I can do my best to guess points...
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:48 pm to Lloyd Braun
285 pounds. 5'11". 36 years young.
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:49 pm to igoringa
I'm thinking you'd get at least 45, honestly. Does she have the calculator?
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:57 pm to Lloyd Braun
She says no, she just used the online thing. 45 plus 49 floaters?
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:06 pm to Benchwarmer
quote:
quitting smoking is the best decision you've ever made. I smoked for 15 years and quit 20 yrs, 4 mos, and 8 days ago, but whose counting. weight control is your #2. Dog is #3 I guess but could have been a gerbil.
I've been an on-and-off quitter for at least 2 years.. I'm trying to make it permanent this time.
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:06 pm to igoringa
Yeah - everyone gets the same 49 weekly points. I would work your way back up to 45 rather than jumping straight to it, personally. Eat 40 next week then jump up to 45. Then maybe lose a point every 7 lbs lost?
I hope my guesses are okay
I'd hate to mess you up. But I weighed around 270 when points+ started and had 43. So I think 45 is a conservative estimate - men seem to get a pretty good amount more points than women.
How have your losses been?
I hope my guesses are okay
How have your losses been?
Posted on 4/29/11 at 1:40 am to Lloyd Braun
Don't trust her. She can't sell computers for crap and she destroyed the Dinkins re-election.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:32 am to TigerMyth36
363/335.0/250
Was 335.8 yesterday so hopefully a loss is about to come.
Was 335.8 yesterday so hopefully a loss is about to come.
This post was edited on 4/29/11 at 8:44 am
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:16 am to Hulkklogan
170/155/150
haven't been 155 in three years. 32's are loose.
haven't been 155 in three years. 32's are loose.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:18 am to Benchwarmer
quote:
haven't been 155 in three years. 32's are loose.
Nice!
Loose 32s.. I don't know if I ever wanna be quite that small
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:40 am to Hulkklogan
Hey Hulk, unless you ate an actual cow last night I don't think you moved back to 355. Edit your weight.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:43 am to TigerMyth36
quote:
Hey Hulk, unless you ate an actual cow last night I don't think you moved back to 355. Edit your weight.
woops
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:44 am to Lloyd Braun
quote:
Yeah - everyone gets the same 49 weekly points. I would work your way back up to 45 rather than jumping straight to it, personally. Eat 40 next week then jump up to 45. Then maybe lose a point every 7 lbs lost?
I may increase it gradually over the next several weeks. Thanks so much!
quote:
I hope my guesses are okay I'd hate to mess you up. But I weighed around 270 when points+ started and had 43. So I think 45 is a conservative estimate - men seem to get a pretty good amount more points than women.
That would seem logical.
quote:
How have your losses been?
Well I entered a 90 challenge at my gym on April 9 (and it is around then that I restarted.... i am down about 25.
This post was edited on 4/29/11 at 8:45 am
Posted on 4/29/11 at 9:00 am to Hulkklogan
From 6'3 to get to 5'9", I could either saw your head off or chop your legs at the knees. the latter would negatively affect your exercise program. The former could solve your food consumtion issues.
your goal is to lose one of me not be me.
your goal is to lose one of me not be me.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 9:04 am to igoringa
Igoringa,
It sounds like you may have found out why you hate the new system. However, after you make the suggested corrections, if you still hate it, there is nothing that says you can't still use the old system. It worked.
These diet systems change things up every couple of years whether they need it or not. They have to sell more crap.
It sounds like you may have found out why you hate the new system. However, after you make the suggested corrections, if you still hate it, there is nothing that says you can't still use the old system. It worked.
These diet systems change things up every couple of years whether they need it or not. They have to sell more crap.
Popular
Back to top



0





