- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If reputable steak houses serve their steak still searing on the plate...
Posted on 4/9/19 at 9:51 pm to Tigerpaw123
Posted on 4/9/19 at 9:51 pm to Tigerpaw123
quote:
Interesting story behind that, do you know where the Orginal location was?
1100 North Broad Street according to the Wikipedia.
Which is just across from Crescent City Steakhouse.
This post was edited on 4/9/19 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 4/9/19 at 9:51 pm to Buck_Rogers
Used to love the iron pot on Perkins in college with mushrooms as a side .
Posted on 4/9/19 at 9:52 pm to Smeg
quote:
You can have a sizzling steak that has rested, if you plate it on one of these stainless steel Nordic Ware servers, that's been under the broiler for a while.
And those are actually called in the kitchen “sizzle platters.”
Peter Lugar’s puts it on a sizzle platter and cuts it right away.
I don’t give a shite one way or the other as long as it is medium rare.
And the Ruth’s on Broad had homemade potato chips served with a small stainless bowl of cold ketchup and i ate baskets of them. They also had the booths with the curtains.
Posted on 4/9/19 at 9:54 pm to fightin tigers
I stand corrected, but the first franchise was just outside of Baton Rouge on airline hwy, which was most recently Southern Kumforts gentlemen’s club
Posted on 4/9/19 at 9:58 pm to Tigerpaw123
That was TJ Moran’s first location before he moved to College Drive.
And he, nor any other Ruth’s served the potato chips and I don’t know why.
And he, nor any other Ruth’s served the potato chips and I don’t know why.
Posted on 4/9/19 at 10:36 pm to Buck_Rogers
I don’t want a steak that’s sizzling unless it’s a skirt steak accompanied by guacamole, sour cream, pico, and hot tortillas.
Posted on 4/9/19 at 10:51 pm to Smeg
.
My attempts at extended rests always fail to impress as much as a freshly chargrilled steak hot off the grill.
My attempts at extended rests always fail to impress as much as a freshly chargrilled steak hot off the grill.
Posted on 4/9/19 at 10:57 pm to Lookin4Par
Hate hot plates. I want my steak rare as hell; I don't want the plate to keep cooking it.
Posted on 4/10/19 at 12:59 am to Sherman Klump
quote:No butter? No sizzling plate? No dick sucking? What kinda shitty steakhouses are you going to?
although I’ve eaten steak on a non sizzling plate of no butter and never made anyone suck my dick
Posted on 4/10/19 at 1:04 am to Buck_Rogers
I love a steak on a sizzling platter of butter, especially brown butter.
Posted on 4/10/19 at 5:19 am to fightin tigers
Stabs! brings out their filets in a cast iron skillet that’s sizzling. Pretty sure the steak has rested though as it doesn’t bleed when you cut into it.
Posted on 4/10/19 at 5:37 am to Buck_Rogers
Just wanted to say that Ruth’s Chris in Baton Rouge, specifically, is the greatest restaurant to ever exist in modern history.
Posted on 4/10/19 at 7:02 am to TheEnglishman
quote:
I'm really confused as to why this last part was necessary.
How can you possibly be confused of why I said I that?
Posted on 4/10/19 at 8:23 am to Jay Are
quote:My 80 year old Mother is enamored and OCD about hot plates. Every meal she wants a hot plate then pitter patters around while the meal gets cold.
Hate hot plates. I want my steak rare as hell; I don't want the plate to keep cooking it.
Used to be a thing in restaurants like the discussion here: hot plate meant step above generic fast food.
So in my 80 year old mothers' mind: hot plate = quality.
Don't be an 80 year old mother people!
Posted on 4/10/19 at 8:37 am to Buck_Rogers
Steaks should be Char Grilled anyway. I don't want mine coming out of an oven.
Posted on 4/10/19 at 8:40 am to Buck_Rogers
I assume they rest the steaks then throw them on the plate when it’s time to serve. For all we know, it was just a kitchen trick to make the whole table got their steaks hot and at the same time, even if some were ready before others.
Posted on 4/10/19 at 9:19 am to Smeg
Thought this was interesting:
On resting meat, from Quora.
Chris Young
Chris Young, Coauthor Modernist Cuisine, Cofounder ChefSteps
Answered Feb 15, 2014
The statement that resting allows muscle fibers to absorb juices forced out during cooking is a myth; one that has entirely been debunked by meat scientists. And yet, experienced cooks know that letting meat sit—or “rest”—after cooking makes it juicier.
As chefs, our conventional wisdom is that this delay allows moisture that cooking has forced to the interior of the meat to move back toward the surface as its reabsorbed, but water actually diffuses through meat too slowly to migrate far during cooking or resting. Also, water is flowing outward not inward during cooking; the sizzle of juices flashing to steam in your pan is the tell-tale evidence of this.
So what's really going on? The water inside any muscle food—meat or seafood—is mostly trapped between the contracting protein filaments inside each muscle fiber. Cooking releases a lot of this water, and forces some of it outside of the muscle fibers. If you slice into a steak hot off the grill, the juice flows freely out of the meat and onto the cutting board or plate. But if you rest that same steak for a few minutes so that it cools slightly, less juice leaks out when the meat is cut. Why? Because degraded and dissolved proteins contained in the juices slightly thicken the natural juices as they cool during resting. The thickened liquid then escapes more slowly when the meat is sliced. This means more of those juices end up in your mouth and not on your cutting board.

On resting meat, from Quora.
Chris Young
Chris Young, Coauthor Modernist Cuisine, Cofounder ChefSteps
Answered Feb 15, 2014
The statement that resting allows muscle fibers to absorb juices forced out during cooking is a myth; one that has entirely been debunked by meat scientists. And yet, experienced cooks know that letting meat sit—or “rest”—after cooking makes it juicier.
As chefs, our conventional wisdom is that this delay allows moisture that cooking has forced to the interior of the meat to move back toward the surface as its reabsorbed, but water actually diffuses through meat too slowly to migrate far during cooking or resting. Also, water is flowing outward not inward during cooking; the sizzle of juices flashing to steam in your pan is the tell-tale evidence of this.
So what's really going on? The water inside any muscle food—meat or seafood—is mostly trapped between the contracting protein filaments inside each muscle fiber. Cooking releases a lot of this water, and forces some of it outside of the muscle fibers. If you slice into a steak hot off the grill, the juice flows freely out of the meat and onto the cutting board or plate. But if you rest that same steak for a few minutes so that it cools slightly, less juice leaks out when the meat is cut. Why? Because degraded and dissolved proteins contained in the juices slightly thicken the natural juices as they cool during resting. The thickened liquid then escapes more slowly when the meat is sliced. This means more of those juices end up in your mouth and not on your cutting board.
Posted on 4/10/19 at 9:20 am to Day Wisher
While it doesn't soak back into the fiber resting still does improve the meat though? That is what it appears to say.
Posted on 4/10/19 at 9:22 am to fightin tigers
Yes. Rest your meat before cutting, but not for the reason that people tend to think.

Posted on 4/10/19 at 9:23 am to Day Wisher
I think the idea is resting makes it juicier. Which is why most people rest.
Popular
Back to top


2







