- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jamie Raskin another j6 crybully won’t certify election
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:56 am to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:56 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
But Fatock loves to argue more than he likes being right…. Clearly.
He has to mention "Being right" many times a day, I believe he's trying to convince himself.
1
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:59 am to LSUbest
quote:
This is why the democrats created the J6 insurrection.
That whole thing really made/makes so many of their followers look like gullible fools.....
If they really convinced that many people that the Jan 6th dustup was on the same exact level of 9/11 and Pearl Harbor, you can see how these apparent simpletons would buy into the "Trump is a Nazi" BS, as well.
Definitely not a great look for the people who love to fancy themselves as "the intellectuals."
Try not to buy any magic beans on the way home, Dipsh*ts.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:01 am to oleheat
quote:
That whole thing really made/makes so many of their followers look like gullible fools.....
Well at least they traded their Russian Collusion conspiracy theory for the J-6 conspiracy theory.
Since J-6 ran out of steam, expect a new one to prop up.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:01 am to LSUpsychWARD
wow, so he's an election denier
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:05 am to LSUpsychWARD
I'm not doubting he feels that way, but where is the link to the actual quote in the tweet?
He was way more vague in that podcast he did.
Why fabricate quotes when the truth is bad enough?
He was way more vague in that podcast he did.
Why fabricate quotes when the truth is bad enough?
This post was edited on 11/5/24 at 9:21 am
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:06 am to SlowFlowPro
Meh
Clearly Lindell wasn't the "right people" since he and many others screamed to high heaven about fraud and nobody who could do something about it seemed to give a shite.
If the monolith that is the Dem party, the legacy media, and some deep state actors push the fraud narrative, I guarantee things will be handled differently than in 2020. I wouldn't be surprised if it was the topic of the first impeachment effort this time around.
Clearly Lindell wasn't the "right people" since he and many others screamed to high heaven about fraud and nobody who could do something about it seemed to give a shite.
If the monolith that is the Dem party, the legacy media, and some deep state actors push the fraud narrative, I guarantee things will be handled differently than in 2020. I wouldn't be surprised if it was the topic of the first impeachment effort this time around.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:08 am to GRTiger
quote:
I wouldn't be surprised if it was the topic of the first impeachment effort this time around.
I expect a lot of lawsuits.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:11 am to LSUpsychWARD
This qualifies as treason and what is the penalty for treason? Yeah you know
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:35 am to RogerTheShrubber
he just keep insisting that he's right, parsing words, being duplicitous, ignoring arguments, cherry picking responses, and do so for hours and hours and hours and hours.... He's the new ASURob
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:37 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
he just keep insisting that he's right,
Have you found an actual, legitimate citation for the quote in OP?
Until then, I am right.
quote:
parsing words, being duplicitous, ignoring arguments, cherry picking responses,
Nope. I'm still waiting on the evidence that is an actual quote (not interpretation, parsing words, duplicitous references, etc.) from Raskin.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:37 am to LSUpsychWARD
Good way to get arrested for insurrection, I hear.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:37 am to DaBike
quote:
The Democrats always do what they accuse others of doing.
They said they had to stop Trump at all costs, and they meant it.
THey have been parading the project 2025 bs around and how Trump is going to try and become a dictator yet you have Democrats stating openly in public they wont certify the election while also still crying about 4 years ago in the same breath.
Things that I cannot say should happen to these people.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:38 am to SlowFlowPro
Thanks for making my point. Have an upvote, junior. Your first one today!!
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:39 am to LSUpsychWARD
So much for public servants.
Sounds more like overlords.
Why even have elections if they choose the winner regardless?
Sounds more like overlords.
Why even have elections if they choose the winner regardless?
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:41 am to Vacherie Saint
SFP has some great points at times, but he loses credibility trying to shape the argument so that he appears to be "right" all the time.
Its ok to be wrong. We all are wrong at times, its easy to admit. I would easily rather be wrong standing on my ideals that waffling around based on some composite peer group views.
Its ok to be wrong. We all are wrong at times, its easy to admit. I would easily rather be wrong standing on my ideals that waffling around based on some composite peer group views.
This post was edited on 11/5/24 at 9:43 am
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:44 am to RogerTheShrubber
Rog, this was my first post ITT
I'm still open to being wrong, but that will require a legit sourcing of this quote to Raskin.
quote:
I googled and that quote only appears on echo chamber X/Twitter accounts and nowhere else.
I think that may be an alt account for Black Insurrectionist
I'm still open to being wrong, but that will require a legit sourcing of this quote to Raskin.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:49 am to SlowFlowPro
Yea, my first thought was that has to be fake.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 10:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:NO SIR!
He has never said "Congress shouldn't certify" as an absolute position. He's recently made those comments with a qualification that fraud is present
As posted, Raskin has not "qualified" ANY situation in which he would certify. That is the point.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 10:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What Supreme Court ruling did they ignore?
How about paying off college loans?
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News