- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jamie Raskin another j6 crybully won’t certify election
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:00 am to Enadious
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:00 am to Enadious
quote:
I hope he's not serious or I fear for the safety of his family.
He’s definitely fricking serious, and Raskin would shoot you in the fricking face and gas your entire family if you dared to disagree or stand up to him. He is one of the most evil members of Congress bar none. Schiff may be slightly more evil, but now that Kinzinger and Cheney are out that’s the only one that comes to mind that may be more evil than him.
This post was edited on 11/5/24 at 8:03 am
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:00 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
He said it on Bill Maher
He said the quote in OP?
You posted quotes that are not what is in OP.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:01 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
and?
They laid out the rules, which make his pre-decision comments an impossibility today.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:01 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Raskin would shoot you in the fricking face and gas your entire if you dared to disagree or stand up to him.
There is that OML hyperbole

Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:02 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is that OML hyperbole
The Constitution is the only thing protecting you from many of these monsters.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:03 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:03 am to LSUpsychWARD
So is this what they meant by the last time you can actually cast a vote?
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:06 am to NC_Tigah
Comer tried to score political points. What does that have to do with what Raskin actually said (and if OP was actually said by Raskin)?
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:07 am to SlowFlowPro
He doesn't say it explicitly, but he's referring to the 14 amendment. He's expressing the same idea.
That they will attempt to not allow Trump to take office.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:07 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
He doesn't say it explicitly, but he's referring to the 14 amendment. He's expressing the same idea.
That they will attempt to not allow Trump to take office.
These comments are from before the USSC ruling.
I already showed you where they shut him down and what he'd have had to do (if it was even possible with my retroactivity theory).
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:I posted a video of what he actually said. Your response was "Yeah ... but ... he couldn't really do that." WTF does that have to do with what the POS said?
What does that have to do with what Raskin actually said
Then you go on to address the forum as "an echochamber" for basically quoting the man because his statement may (possibly) have not been issued this month
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:16 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
I posted a video of what he actually said.
Which was not the quote in OP.
quote:
WTF does that have to do with what the POS said?
Once it was established the quote was not the quote in OP, I just made note that the echo chamber content was irrelevant (as you can see others have tried to post it too)
quote:
Then you go on to address the forum as "an echochamber" f
Yes. It's proving that in real time.
quote:
for basically quoting the man
"basically quoting" is not quoting.
quote:
because his statement may (possibly) have not been issued this month
Which would mean OP is fake news and a lie and you see how the NPCs consume the content because it conforms with their preferred echo chamber repetition.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:19 am to SlowFlowPro
This is a strange hill for you to die on today. Go get your triple soy latte and relax.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:19 am to SlowFlowPro
You are naval gazing again.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:20 am to LSUpsychWARD
SFP is hanging his hopes on Jamie Raskin.
This post was edited on 11/5/24 at 8:20 am
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:22 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Raskin took the same basic position as Trump.
In other venues, he went a lot further than Trump. He talked about meeting with others to make sure that Trump never took office, even if if Trump legitimately won the election.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:It is
"basically quoting" is not quoting.
quote:contextual.
literally
So your argument now is that, though Raskin was emphatic in belief congress shouldn't certify, he may not have used the exact words in the OP?
Well, okay then.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:31 am to LSUpsychWARD
Ok on the certfication day if they say no fine!! Mike Johnson becomes the head of government on Jan 19th round up all the no voters for a bull shite excuse have the vote while the Sargent at arms has them locked up.
Jamie raskin needs another cancer diagnosis
Jamie raskin needs another cancer diagnosis
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:32 am to GumboPot
quote:
SFP is hanging his hopes on Jamie Raskin.
wut
Back to top
