- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Crown Season 4 Thread
Posted on 11/22/20 at 12:35 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 11/22/20 at 12:35 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
At least William seems well-adjusted and a worthy successor. Hopefully Charles's reign doesn't last too long.
True. And a lot of that probably has to do with having a parent that was an "outsider" and how that all went down.
Posted on 11/23/20 at 10:35 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
At least William seems well-adjusted and a worthy successor. Hopefully Charles's reign doesn't last too long.
True. And a lot of that probably has to do with having a parent that was an "outsider" and how that all went down.
Yes, William was 15 by the time Diana died. There were enough years that she had a tremendous impact on his behaviors and attitudes. In photos of William with his kids, the children seem to smile and be playful with him, something William never got from Charles. He and Kate appear to actually love each other, as well.
When you see Season 4 of The Crown, Harry and Meghan's desire to go their own way makes a bit more sense. No amount of money and titles would make having the Windsor's as family worth it.
Posted on 11/23/20 at 12:43 pm to Nodust
Great season
Ftr, Diana was clearly nuts.
Ftr, Diana was clearly nuts.
Posted on 11/23/20 at 3:43 pm to Rou Leed
quote:
They really made that character a bafoon. She showed up. Girl power. Didn't fit in at camp. Child was a dope got lost in car race. Drove economy down the shitter. Cried with queen. And then bye bye Maggie.
It seems so weird to me that they did so little on the IRA. They bombed her hotel.
It’s so weird to me how glossed over the Irish independence and terrorism gets everywhere. I guess it’s just so damn complicated.
Posted on 11/23/20 at 3:47 pm to LaLadyinTx
quote:
When you see Season 4 of The Crown, Harry and Meghan's desire to go their own way makes a bit more sense. No amount of money and titles would make having the Windsor's as family worth it.
As soon as you go to hug your mother in law or grandmother in law and she pushes you away, it's time to make your own life.
Posted on 11/23/20 at 11:02 pm to BluegrassBelle
It's funny that throughout the history of this lineage/British royalty, the strongest women were not the first born.
Elizabeth I being the most notable, then Margaret, then Anne.
Elizabeth I being the most notable, then Margaret, then Anne.
Posted on 11/23/20 at 11:06 pm to BluegrassBelle
Didn't William's true love say a big nope to being part of the royal family? The blonde that was a long time family friend he was with before Kate?
Posted on 11/24/20 at 7:34 am to imjustafatkid
quote:Gillian Anderson's portrayal of her was cartoonish and distracting.
They failed with Thatcher.
Posted on 11/24/20 at 7:44 am to Dire Wolf
quote:
It seems so weird to me that they did so little on the IRA.
I thought the Mountbatten assassination would get a little more time.
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:19 am to GetCocky11
You have to keep in mind this is a netflix series that is trying to interweave facts from the different eras while incorporating the personal lives, a behind the scenes look at the royals which is kept so private/personal to begin with that no one can look inside it and get the real truth.
You also have to keep in mind how old elizabeth is and go back in time to how she was brought up
Not a doubt in my mind that the hands off approach to parenting is one reason all those kids seem out of touch with the world they grew up in, they were isolated from those times and they were some pretty volatile times during their formative years
It's long past time for the queen to turn it over to someone new and they should bypass Charles at this point
Once it gets to William I think you might finally see some real meaningful change to the royal family that is long overdue
You also have to keep in mind how old elizabeth is and go back in time to how she was brought up
Not a doubt in my mind that the hands off approach to parenting is one reason all those kids seem out of touch with the world they grew up in, they were isolated from those times and they were some pretty volatile times during their formative years
It's long past time for the queen to turn it over to someone new and they should bypass Charles at this point
Once it gets to William I think you might finally see some real meaningful change to the royal family that is long overdue
This post was edited on 11/24/20 at 8:22 am
Posted on 11/24/20 at 9:11 am to nicholastiger
quote:
It's long past time for the queen to turn it over to someone new and they should bypass Charles at this point
Nah gonna happen.
Posted on 11/24/20 at 9:50 am to nicholastiger
quote:
It's long past time for the queen to turn it over to someone new and they should bypass Charles at this point
Nah. Many of the sovereigns before her believed it was their position until death. She's still of sound mind and sound body. Literally no good reason for her to relinquish it at this point.
Posted on 11/24/20 at 10:01 am to BluegrassBelle
Liz's mom lived to be 101. Her aunt lived to be 102.
She has another seven or eight years in her.
Charles will take the throne at around 80.
William will take over in his 50's.
Phillip is about to hit 100. We'll have to see what his passing does to Liz. Sometimes losing a spouse accelerates your decline.
She has another seven or eight years in her.
Charles will take the throne at around 80.
William will take over in his 50's.
Phillip is about to hit 100. We'll have to see what his passing does to Liz. Sometimes losing a spouse accelerates your decline.
Posted on 11/24/20 at 9:49 pm to Nodust
quote:
Princess Margaret is my favorite. Everybody else is cold hearted.
How different would her life had been if she'd been allowed to marry Peter Townsend?
the big thing about the casting in my mind is how totally gormless Charles, Andrew, and Edward look...
Posted on 11/30/20 at 5:25 pm to vl100butch
Just finished the series and my question is why did they not cover Thatcher's hotel getting bombed and her barely surviving by the skin of her teeth?
That was a major event in her premiership and iirc, had repercussions.
With that said, Charles is still a piece of shite but the person who is mostly responsible for this failure of a marriage is the Queen herself. She knew there was a possibility that the marriage would not work out, the signs kept showing up and she still pushed her son into it anyway and did a lot to make sure they stayed together despite the clear as a blue sky signs it never worked.
She failed as a mother to her son.
That was a major event in her premiership and iirc, had repercussions.
With that said, Charles is still a piece of shite but the person who is mostly responsible for this failure of a marriage is the Queen herself. She knew there was a possibility that the marriage would not work out, the signs kept showing up and she still pushed her son into it anyway and did a lot to make sure they stayed together despite the clear as a blue sky signs it never worked.
She failed as a mother to her son.
Posted on 11/30/20 at 6:45 pm to Sentrius
quote:
Just finished the series and my question is why did they not cover Thatcher's hotel getting bombed and her barely surviving by the skin of her teeth?
It is odd some of the things that they didn’t cover.
Anne’s kidnapping attempt would’ve been another. Her badass basically told kidnappers to bugger off when they tried. Would’ve made for great TV.
Posted on 1/4/21 at 2:16 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
It is odd some of the things that they didn’t cover.
Anne’s kidnapping attempt would’ve been another. Her badass basically told kidnappers to bugger off when they tried. Would’ve made for great TV.
I was surprised by that as well.
Posted on 7/12/21 at 9:56 am to Sentrius
We finally started watching The Crown a couple of months ago and are about halfway through season 4.
I agree with some...Gillian Anderson nails Margaret Thatchers voice.
I agree with others...the voice seems forced/over-acted and GA seems to really labor through the role. It's exhausting watching her when she is speaking
I agree with most of the other sentiments, and this season has been really really good so far.
Oh, and Anne.... Big fan of the actress playing her.
I agree with some...Gillian Anderson nails Margaret Thatchers voice.
I agree with others...the voice seems forced/over-acted and GA seems to really labor through the role. It's exhausting watching her when she is speaking
I agree with most of the other sentiments, and this season has been really really good so far.
Oh, and Anne.... Big fan of the actress playing her.
Posted on 7/12/21 at 1:50 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Just finished the series and my question is why did they not cover Thatcher's hotel getting bombed and her barely surviving by the skin of her teeth?
It is odd some of the things that they didn’t cover.
Anne’s kidnapping attempt would’ve been another. Her badass basically told kidnappers to bugger off when they tried. Would’ve made for great TV.
I think the main reason they don't show these things is because above all else, this series is about The Queen. I feel like most of the other people in both the family and government are covered in how they relate to The Queen. It's not about Thatcher or Anne.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News