- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LDWF wants your thoughts on Speckled Trout
Posted on 10/8/21 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 10/8/21 at 2:15 pm
SIAP....Brief survey including creel limits, size and issues. Not that it will matter but I figured you baws would want to see
LDWF Speck Limits
LDWF Speck Limits
Posted on 10/8/21 at 2:25 pm to sonoma8
I'd like to see the regs equal throughout the state.
Lower creel and increase size limit
Lower creel and increase size limit
Posted on 10/8/21 at 4:11 pm to sonoma8
As for size, when they’re fried they fit perfectly on a piece of fresh Evangeline Bread.
Limits, as many as you feel like cleaning.
Miss anything?
Limits, as many as you feel like cleaning.
Miss anything?
Posted on 10/8/21 at 4:38 pm to sonoma8
5 fish. 16” or larger.
My reasoning:
1. You can’t eat 25 fish. And I can catch my limit every time because I know what I’m doing.
2. We shouldn’t be murdering adolescent 12” fish. I target adults later in their lives once they’ve had their run so to speak.
My reasoning:
1. You can’t eat 25 fish. And I can catch my limit every time because I know what I’m doing.
2. We shouldn’t be murdering adolescent 12” fish. I target adults later in their lives once they’ve had their run so to speak.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 5:11 pm to sonoma8
quote:
your thoughts on Speckled Trout
Very good Almondine
Posted on 10/8/21 at 5:51 pm to sonoma8
the only changes that should be made is to double the limits on redfish and drum and reduce the minimum size to 14"
just because many of you are jealous they cant catch fish while others can is no reason to try and reduce what others can catch because you are embarrassed and jealous over it
just because many of you are jealous they cant catch fish while others can is no reason to try and reduce what others can catch because you are embarrassed and jealous over it
Posted on 10/8/21 at 10:01 pm to sonoma8
I think we should increase size limit and decrease the creel limit. I think the trout population is being negatively affected, and something should be done about it to preserve these fish. I’m not one of those “who can’t catch trout” btw, but I do not have a problem with this. I am all about preserving our wildlife and our ecosystem. Doesn’t make you a liberal either for supporting something like this.
Posted on 10/9/21 at 6:18 am to sonoma8
When you hear me bitching about the lack of trout, lower the limit because you’ll know they’re getting scarce
Posted on 10/9/21 at 7:16 am to sonoma8
There are a bunch of issues here.
With changes over time with things like MS River diversions, the trout have moved. Have the test areas that WLF uses to gather base data from changed as well?
What is the kill rate for undersized trout caught? No matter what the MIN is.
Different areas 100% must have different limits.
For the people that say you cannot eat 25 fish…..guess you don’t have much of a family or never fry fish for a ball game?
Just hope the ultimate decision is the right thing and not some political BS.
With changes over time with things like MS River diversions, the trout have moved. Have the test areas that WLF uses to gather base data from changed as well?
What is the kill rate for undersized trout caught? No matter what the MIN is.
Different areas 100% must have different limits.
For the people that say you cannot eat 25 fish…..guess you don’t have much of a family or never fry fish for a ball game?
Just hope the ultimate decision is the right thing and not some political BS.
Posted on 10/11/21 at 9:04 am to sonoma8
I have only fished for trout twice in La. this year. Both times, I caught the absolute shite out of 11.78" trout. Over 12? Not so many. Just makes me wonder where the older classes live, and why I have so much trouble catching them.
Posted on 10/11/21 at 4:09 pm to sonoma8
I think only 1 thing should be changed at a time. Most likely bump it down to 15 or 20 and revisit after seeing the effects.
Posted on 10/11/21 at 5:17 pm to sonoma8
I've been trout fishing for 3 decades in the vermillion bay and cocodrie areas. I fish probably 15 to 20 times a year from June till Nov. I took the survey and every bit of it is true. There is a decline. I personally like the 25 fish bag a person because personally we dont always limit out. However, I have seen most of my travels that trout in cocodrie have been more school sized(12 to 14s) trips and in years past the trout were always bigger at Vermillion Bay area. Not the case as much at Vermillion bay these days. In the last 3 yrs at vermillion Bay as well as cocodrie the fish are smaller. Years before the trout were much bigger and anyone that really know Verm bay area knows what I'm saying. But now there are many trips with throw backs, many many. Here is my suggestion and here me out, it's just a suggestion and I gave it to the survey.
If you wanna change it, if the science says it's okay, reduce the limit to 15 trout but make the size 16 inches like reds. I must be crazy right? Listen to my reasoning. 15 trout at 16 inches or bigger will be much more meat than 25 12/13s....any real trout fisherman knows this. So there isn't any drop off at all to the fisherman's harvest and the trout population can grow big. It may take a couple years for the population to grow but to me it's worth it. All of us are tired tbh of the smaller fish and love the bigger trout.
Just my 2 cents from a long time trout angler.
If you wanna change it, if the science says it's okay, reduce the limit to 15 trout but make the size 16 inches like reds. I must be crazy right? Listen to my reasoning. 15 trout at 16 inches or bigger will be much more meat than 25 12/13s....any real trout fisherman knows this. So there isn't any drop off at all to the fisherman's harvest and the trout population can grow big. It may take a couple years for the population to grow but to me it's worth it. All of us are tired tbh of the smaller fish and love the bigger trout.
Just my 2 cents from a long time trout angler.
Posted on 10/12/21 at 9:05 pm to sonoma8
LDWF can frick off. They don’t want our opinion. They just want to stall further and do nothing.
Posted on 10/14/21 at 5:38 am to sonoma8
I wonder what the mortality rate is on the undersize specks caught and thrown back. I went fishing yesterday and caught the shite out of undersize trout. They were hooked in the eye, through the skull, mouths shredded, etc. i would imagine a significant number wont make it. Cant compare redfish to trout. Reds have hard mouths. Mortality rate must be lower on the throwbacks.
That said, I would be for a much lower limit but of any size. Like bass.
That said, I would be for a much lower limit but of any size. Like bass.
Posted on 12/2/21 at 6:50 pm to sonoma8
quote:LINK
Today, the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission voted to delay a decision on spotted seatrout management changes until October 2022. The current 12-inch minimum total length and 25 fish daily bag limit will remain in place (except in defined areas of Cameron and Calcasieu parishes where there is a 15 fish daily bag limit, with no more than two over 25").
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News