Started By
Message

re: LA now has Constitutional Carry?

Posted on 6/25/21 at 4:22 am to
Posted by SlickRickerz
Member since Oct 2018
2290 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 4:22 am to
The bill was put onto his desk 6/04/21 so 20 days from that would be 6/24, so isn’t too late for him to veto it?
Posted by dakarx
Member since Sep 2018
6972 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 6:35 am to
The legislature has allowed him to veto a bill on day #21... totally spineless.


Not expecting it to be signed or to outlast the day.... but hoping to be pleasantly surprised over the weekend.



Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29350 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 6:47 am to
Let’s clarify a couple of things.

There have been two veto override sessions since our previous Crooked Governor named Edwards rewrote the Constitution to give himself almost unlimited power in the early 1970’s (1972 IIRC).

He has line item veto ability, so he can go right done the list of state funded projects and appropriations and whack any money headed for a district where a legislator has bucked him. Honor Choade has used this like no one before to club the opposition into submission. He’s already struck several appropriations headed for the Senate President’s constituency.

He doesn’t want the special session, if they grow enough balls to show up for it, they are likely to override several vetoes, especially CC and the Men as Women bill. Both of these are high profile and emotional issues he’s way in the wrong on. Our voting citizens want these (not counting the deceased that vote).

He was also prepared to veto several tax bills. He’s negotiating signing those in return for them going away on the above.

tl;dr The sloth is using a carrot and stick approach to avoid an override session
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
22180 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 6:52 am to
quote:

So then why hasnt he vetoed it yet? What's the point in waiting since it's been on his desk just sitting?


To serve as another FU to the people of Louisiana. He'll end up vetoing it on like the last day in the final hours.
Posted by JColtF
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Aug 2008
4749 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 6:54 am to
quote:

The sloth is using a carrot and stick approach to avoid an override session


Our Legislature can slap that away and enter a veto session and I'm not sure why they haven't

They could use that as a springboard for to run for governor
Posted by Herooftheday
Member since Feb 2021
3830 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 7:05 am to
They can't until 40 days have passed since the session was over. Session ended 6/10, so 7/20 is the time for a veto session. And since the vetoes are happening while they are not in session, the veto session will be automatic
This post was edited on 6/25/21 at 7:06 am
Posted by SlickRickerz
Member since Oct 2018
2290 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 7:08 am to
But the law says you have 10 days if they're still in session and 20 days if session is over to sign a bill or it becomes a law automatically. It was put on his desk on 6/04 so 20 days would be 6/24. Today is 6/25, how does he still have the ability to veto it if it’s past the 20 days.
This post was edited on 6/25/21 at 7:12 am
Posted by Herooftheday
Member since Feb 2021
3830 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 7:09 am to
And I don't know if he's vetoing on the 21st day for sure. He may very well be vetoing on the 20th day but announcing on the 21st day. Which is shite anyway.

Im sure they'd let him veto whenever he wants so long as he backdated to the deadline.
Posted by Herooftheday
Member since Feb 2021
3830 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 7:10 am to

quote:

how does he still have the ability to veto it if it’s passed the 20 days.


Ask your rep. Report back here.
This post was edited on 6/25/21 at 7:11 am
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29351 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 8:00 am to
quote:

the veto session will be automatic


Unless the majority of legislators want to not have it.

Based on the fact that Cortez is saying anything right now I think this is where the Senate comes into play.

ETA

Because of this related to Cortez

quote:

He’s already struck several appropriations headed for the Senate President’s constituency.


and this

quote:

He was also prepared to veto several tax bills. He’s negotiating signing those in return for them going away on the above.
This post was edited on 6/25/21 at 8:02 am
Posted by dragginass
Member since Jan 2013
2785 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 11:49 am to
Still no update?
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29351 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 11:55 am to
Not that I’ve heard……JBE is playing this one close to the vest.
Posted by bayourougebengal
Member since Mar 2008
7194 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 11:59 am to
quote:

Not that I’ve heard……JBE is playing this one close to the vest.

Well can you please hurry up and hear something?
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20588 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 12:17 pm to
Can someone explain how he could legally sign a veto today?
Does the 10/20 day period start with the next day?
Posted by CootKilla
In a beer can/All dog's nightmares
Member since Jul 2007
5929 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 12:22 pm to
Like said earlier, the crooked fricker probably backdates it.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20588 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Like said earlier, the crooked fricker probably backdates it.

What's his option to do that?

I mean, aren't there any big groups monitoring this? You'd definitely think there would be. I don't see how he could just sit on something and sneak it in later, I'd think there is a clock ticking and some big organization (NRA for example) watching closely.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Can someone explain how he could legally sign a veto today?
Does the 10/20 day period start with the next day?


I think he has 10/20 days to veto from the time his office recieves the bill...not from the time it was passed.
This post was edited on 6/25/21 at 2:58 pm
Posted by Herooftheday
Member since Feb 2021
3830 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 4:35 pm to
Hes not waiting for the hard copy to show up in the mailbox. The date sent is the date recieved as stated on the bill timeline on legis.la.gov.

Look up HB20. That bill was sent while they were in session, so 10 day rule.

Sent on 5/26
Vetoed on 6/7.

Days in hand: 14
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14545 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

The date sent is the date recieved as stated on the bill timeline on legis.la.gov.


What makes you think this?
Posted by Herooftheday
Member since Feb 2021
3830 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 4:53 pm to
Do you suspect there's an electronic hold of some sort on files sent from one branch to the next?

Unless some sectetary or intern is walking manilla folders from the Congress to the governor's office as the get passed and letting him know it's on his desk.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram