- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Leaked Pfizer study shows that vaccine particles are hugely sequestered into the ovaries
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:22 am to stout
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:22 am to stout
Liposomes are generally cleared by the reticuloendothelial system...which is a problem for using these delivery systems to treat cancer.
The adrenal and ovaries are steroidogenic tissues and use HDL as a significant source for acquiring cholesterol. The class B type 1 scavenger receptor (SR-B1) is essential for HDL binding and delivery of cholesterol to these tissues. It's also highly abundant in liver and spleen. My guess is that this receptor is mediating tissue-uptake of this formulation. It's a testable hypothesis.
But that's not really the important question. Is there any data to suggest that these liposomal formulations are toxic to cells? If so, what is the LD50? Are these concentrations anywhere near the LD50? All of that information would have been required for FDA authorization. The company is required to report that to the FDA, but not necessarily make that public.
The adrenal and ovaries are steroidogenic tissues and use HDL as a significant source for acquiring cholesterol. The class B type 1 scavenger receptor (SR-B1) is essential for HDL binding and delivery of cholesterol to these tissues. It's also highly abundant in liver and spleen. My guess is that this receptor is mediating tissue-uptake of this formulation. It's a testable hypothesis.
But that's not really the important question. Is there any data to suggest that these liposomal formulations are toxic to cells? If so, what is the LD50? Are these concentrations anywhere near the LD50? All of that information would have been required for FDA authorization. The company is required to report that to the FDA, but not necessarily make that public.
1
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:22 am to Crimson
does it matter? why is anything tested on mice if it hold no value? the real human study will be in 3-5 years on the ones who received the shot
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:27 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
<0.1% for 8-48 hrs is "hugely sequestered"???
Thanks for shedding some deserved objectivity onto this - Not having read the fine print myself, I was beginning to let my mind wander about untethered also.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:39 am to Pezzo
quote:When one hasn't the knowledge to understand the findings or ask appropriate follow up questions, one probably should slow down before declaring this some mass conspiracy to sterilize the world like so many on this board will. This is a part of a study on mice and not the entire study.
people aren't supposed to think for themselves
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:41 am to Wildcat1996
quote:This doesn't matter, it is time for this board to fly off the handle.
But that's not really the important question. Is there any data to suggest that these liposomal formulations are toxic to cells?
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:45 am to Privateer 2007
quote:
ppl at statistically zero risk from the virus.
theres no such ppl.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:51 am to Pezzo
quote:I'm too tired to think. Tell us what that means so we don't have to.
shhhhh dont talk about this
people aren't supposed to think for themselves
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:51 am to Lsupimp
quote:
I have noted your exasperation, LOL.
quote:Gotta love it.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:54 am to stout
It seems my work has already been done for me in this thread
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:56 am to stout
Folks. I don’t want to be someone who dissuades parents from getting a perfectly good vaccine for their kids. But here today, May 31st, 2021, our entire medical community cannot say conclusively that this vaccine is or is not perfectly good for female reproductive health. The absolutely only way to know for certain is in about a year from now. Yes May/June 2022 at the very earliest.
That will be nine months after we have data from probably thousands of post-vaccine child births and another three months to collect and evaluate the data.
Anyone theorizing that it is 100% safe today (5/31/2021), is basing their opinion on assumption and not fact. There is no shortcut when talking about human reproductive processes. It just takes time.
That will be nine months after we have data from probably thousands of post-vaccine child births and another three months to collect and evaluate the data.
Anyone theorizing that it is 100% safe today (5/31/2021), is basing their opinion on assumption and not fact. There is no shortcut when talking about human reproductive processes. It just takes time.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 9:57 am to stout
Gates wanted to win a peace prize, so he aligned with Epstein (well documented)
Epstein wanted to build a eugenics utopia based off his own DNA
Read between the lines
These folks are psychotic...
Epstein wanted to build a eugenics utopia based off his own DNA
Read between the lines
These folks are psychotic...
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:01 am to Jake88
quote:
This is a part of a study on mice and not the entire study.
so why spend all this time and money studying the effects on mice, if it holds no significance, when there is 100's of millions of people now vaccinated across the country? I'm sure there would be more than enough volunteers lined up in the name of science to give blood from different parts of their body, free of charge! all you have to do is tell them they get a free donut or a their name would be entered into a lottery drawing. 50 lucky winners!
oh wait...they dont want people to think its an experimental study.
This post was edited on 5/31/21 at 10:08 am
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:08 am to Pezzo
quote:Mouse studies certainly hold value, or can.
why is anything tested on mice
But there are many differences c/w humans. E.g., In this instance the injection is intramuscular. Importance? The human deltoid is a larger structure which limits intravascular uptake. That is pertinent.
After liposomal uptake and mRNA spike (S-protein) production, the spikes attach to the cell surface serving as epitopes there. S-protein is generally not shed. So S-protein distribution may well be less systemic in larger mammals/humans than in mice.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:10 am to stout
Wow this is dumb as frick. Nicely done being dumb as frick.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:10 am to Pezzo
Jesus h Christ
All the people laughing at the bullshite theories about COVID are now going overboard with vaccine conspiracies
All the people laughing at the bullshite theories about COVID are now going overboard with vaccine conspiracies
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:13 am to stout
That explains my ovary pain.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:13 am to Pezzo
It's almost as if they designed a virus to decrease the human population.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:14 am to stout
Welll i know 3 chicks that have gotten knocked up after the Pfizer vaccine so if its supposed to sterilize its doing a shitty job of it
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:15 am to stout
Please don’t fan the BS narrative with this kind of post.
This says NOTHING about long term sequestration, or tissue effects. It is standard pharmacokinetic studies.
This says NOTHING about long term sequestration, or tissue effects. It is standard pharmacokinetic studies.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:22 am to ThinePreparedAni
quote:Damn! That explains it.
Gates wanted to win a peace prize, so he aligned with Epstein (well documented)
Epstein wanted to build a eugenics utopia based off his own DNA
Read between the lines
Ever since the 2nd dose, I've had a desire to buy a plane and a Virgin Island compound.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News