- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Derek Chauvin's legal team requests new trial, alleging jury misconduct
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:11 pm
ABC News
quote:
The legal team for former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who was convicted of murdering George Floyd last month, has filed a motion in a Minneapolis court requesting a new trial on multiple grounds, including jury misconduct.
In the filing, Chauvin’s attorney says the former officer should have a new trial in the “interests of justice; abuse of discretion that deprived the Defendant of a fair trial; prosecutorial and jury misconduct; errors of law at trial; and a verdict that is contrary to law.”
quote:
"The jury committed misconduct, felt threatened or intimidated, felt race-based pressure during the proceedings, and/or failed to adhere to instructions during deliberations, in violation of Mr. Chauvin’s constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial," attorney Eric Nelson writes in the filing.
Nelson also claims that the court failed to sequester the jury during the trial, which resulted to their exposure “to prejudicial publicity regarding the trial during the proceedings, as well as jury intimidation and potential fear of retribution among jurors.”
Chauvin was found guilty April 20 of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in the death of George Floyd.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:14 pm to AUFan2015
One of the jurors is a freaking BLM activist who lied to get on the jury! Hell, Chauvin should get 27 million from the freakin city and a new identity.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:16 pm to AUFan2015
Mr Gambini, that is a lucid, well thought out objection.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:18 pm to AUFan2015
here is the filing.
https://mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/High-Profile-Cases/27-CR-20-12646/Notice-of-Motion-and-Motion.pdf
they at minimal the juror at a BLM rally that lied on the questionnaire and said he never protested.
the very sad thing is: if the entire thing is thrown out and Chauvin gets minimal or no jail time.
The DOJ is just waiting with charges. Which is WRONG of course but they will get away with it.
https://mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/High-Profile-Cases/27-CR-20-12646/Notice-of-Motion-and-Motion.pdf
they at minimal the juror at a BLM rally that lied on the questionnaire and said he never protested.
the very sad thing is: if the entire thing is thrown out and Chauvin gets minimal or no jail time.
The DOJ is just waiting with charges. Which is WRONG of course but they will get away with it.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:18 pm to AUFan2015
quote:
Derek Chauvin's legal team requests new trial, alleging jury misconduct
What's the saying...it was a modern day lynching.
We had a show trial with people outside threatening to riot if they did not get what they wanted.
Regardless of whether or not you think Chauvin was guilty, it's hard to imagine anyone thinking that's how our legal system ought to work.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:20 pm to AUFan2015
We all know how this story ends. The narrative has already been written. Chauvin is to be the state of Minnesota's sacrifice on the altar of social justice.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:21 pm to AUFan2015
I think Chauvin should be found guilty on all charges, but the fact that the sitting president of the United States publicly encouraged the jury to find a desired outcome on national TV is dumbfounding. The value of judicial independence aside, it’s just begging for exactly this type of legal challenge.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:24 pm to AUFan2015
I'm no legal expert but in a fair situation I don't see how that it wouldn't get thrown out
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:25 pm to AUFan2015
Standard.
However, it's also deserved.
However, it's also deserved.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:25 pm to AUFan2015
I hope it's all thrown out and the judge cites, besides this cluster frick juror fiasco, Maxine and Biden's comments as well.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:30 pm to AUFan2015
DENIED - NO STANDING
doesnt matter if you have evidence to prove it, you must be sacrificed on the alter of PC BS
i wish they would have entered into the record the president and sitting congressmen threatening jurors as well as others
doesnt matter if you have evidence to prove it, you must be sacrificed on the alter of PC BS
i wish they would have entered into the record the president and sitting congressmen threatening jurors as well as others
This post was edited on 5/4/21 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:32 pm to AUFan2015
All judges will rule there is no standing for an appeal, as they all wish to remain standing.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:35 pm to teke184
Collect what ever evidence, records, pics and video they want of the jurors, it's a good bet the ruling will still be
to what we've already seen.
to what we've already seen.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:36 pm to AUFan2015
They also better ask for a new trial based on the fact that the judge obviously erred (better put - COMPLETELY F*CKED UP) in not granting a change in venue and sequestered jury that anyone with an IQ above single digits could see was WRONG after the last complete f*cking joke of a "trial."
This post was edited on 5/4/21 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 5/4/21 at 5:37 pm to AUFan2015
“No standing.”
This post was edited on 5/4/21 at 5:40 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News