- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Question:With Taxing/Outlawing 10+ magazines currently part of Biden's Gun Control Plan.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 7:53 am
Posted on 2/16/21 at 7:53 am
Will manufacturers create and sell < 10 round magazines to make their firearm compliant? I know California and Colorado have current mag restriction laws.
And is the proposed cut off at 10 or anything over 10?
And is the proposed cut off at 10 or anything over 10?
17
Posted on 2/16/21 at 7:54 am to WhitewaterDawg
Yes
Posted on 2/16/21 at 7:55 am to WhitewaterDawg
Any amount that someone deems "scary".
Posted on 2/16/21 at 8:00 am to WhitewaterDawg
So, is the army also going to reduce down to <10 rounds per mag?
Posted on 2/16/21 at 8:12 am to WhitewaterDawg
This is just going to push people into high powered extended range rifles
Posted on 2/16/21 at 8:26 am to WhitewaterDawg
All my mags identify as 10 rounders.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 8:28 am to WhitewaterDawg
Magazine capacity restrictions don’t actually do anything other than inconvenience legal gun owners.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 10:03 am to WhitewaterDawg
Just call them 6x5 magazines. The leftists will be too stupid to understand.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 10:19 am to WhitewaterDawg
They’ll continue to make their magazines the same way and make a component inside the mag to stop the load at 10. It’ll be the customers choice whether to leave that widget inside the mag and stay compliant or remove it at their own discretion. Mark it down.
This post was edited on 2/16/21 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 2/16/21 at 10:26 am to WhitewaterDawg
Shall Not Be Infringed
We cannot let this Administration succeed in limiting, eliminating, or regulating anything regarding our 2nd Amendment rights. If they succeed, even once, they will not stop until the 2nd Amendment is completely removed from our Constitution. Hold the Rope Boys & Girls.
We cannot let this Administration succeed in limiting, eliminating, or regulating anything regarding our 2nd Amendment rights. If they succeed, even once, they will not stop until the 2nd Amendment is completely removed from our Constitution. Hold the Rope Boys & Girls.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 11:09 am to WhitewaterDawg
Manufacturers will sell a magazine that is really long but will hold ten.
Easily modified by the end user to hold more and absolve them of recompense
Easily modified by the end user to hold more and absolve them of recompense
Posted on 2/16/21 at 3:55 pm to WhitewaterDawg
The 9th ruled, last year, that the California magazine capacity limit was unconstitutional. If that lib institution struck it down then there's no way it would stand up to a conservative SC. Even with RINO Roberts siding with the liberals.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 4:37 pm to WhitewaterDawg
The scary looking gun and 10+ mag registration compliance rate in California is around 3%.
In NY and Conn. it is around 10%.
Very few will comply with these laws.
A cottage industry of homemade mags will spring up. They can be 3-D printed.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 4:39 pm to WhitewaterDawg
They already do to comply with fricking stupid jurisdictions.
Glock sells a mag of 6 for states like NJ for guns where you can have up to 34 in a mag.
Glock sells a mag of 6 for states like NJ for guns where you can have up to 34 in a mag.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 5:11 pm to WhitewaterDawg
quote:
Will manufacturers create and sell < 10 round magazines to make their firearm compliant?
There's another thread on the first page about how math is racist.
BUT...if they did decide to be objective about what 10 means in this case, desktop CNC mills and 3d printers are cheap
Posted on 2/16/21 at 5:28 pm to WhitewaterDawg
I was talking with my friend yesterday about the genius of the 2nd Amendment's language: "...shall not be infringed."
IF this were to make it through congress and signed into law, it would immediately go to SCOTUS. Even if Biden's Administration only wanted to tax the firearms and mags, that tax may very well infringe on Americans' rights if they can't afford to pay them.
The 2A simply states infringe. Not take away. Not outlaw. Infringe.
Founding Fathers knew what they were doing.
IF this were to make it through congress and signed into law, it would immediately go to SCOTUS. Even if Biden's Administration only wanted to tax the firearms and mags, that tax may very well infringe on Americans' rights if they can't afford to pay them.
The 2A simply states infringe. Not take away. Not outlaw. Infringe.
Founding Fathers knew what they were doing.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 5:42 pm to WhitewaterDawg
Why would you want a 10 rounder when 30 rounders are readily available?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News