- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Biden Launches Commission On ‘Supreme Court Reform’
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:29 am
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:29 am
This is apparently a prelude to court packing.
Add this to the list of job killer and advocate of institutionalized racism under the guise of "equity."
Is it too early to dub Biden as the worst president of all time?
politico
Add this to the list of job killer and advocate of institutionalized racism under the guise of "equity."
Is it too early to dub Biden as the worst president of all time?
quote:
The Biden administration is moving forward with the creation of a bipartisan commission to study reforms to the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary.
The commission will be housed under the purview of the White House Counsel’s office and filled out with the behind-the-scenes help of the Biden campaign’s lawyer Bob Bauer, who will co-chair the commission. Its specific mandate is still being decided. But, in a signal that the commission is indeed moving ahead, some members have already been selected, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions.
Among those who will be on the commission are Cristina Rodríguez, a professor at Yale Law School and a former deputy assistant attorney general in the Obama Department of Justice, who will join Bauer as co-chair. Caroline Fredrickson, the former president of the American Constitution Society, and Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and a former assistant attorney general in the Bush Department of Justice, will also serve on the commission, those familiar with discussions said.
Fredrickson has hinted that she is intellectually supportive of ideas like court expansion. In 2019, she said in an interview with Eric Lesh, the executive director of the LGBT Bar Association and Foundation of Greater New York: “I often point out to people who aren't lawyers that the Supreme Court is not defined as ‘nine person body’ in the Constitution, and it has changed size many times.”
politico
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:30 am to L.A.
quote:
Is it too early to dub Biden as the worst president of all time?
No.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:31 am to L.A.
quote:
Is it too early to dub Biden as the worst president of all time?
I fear it might be too late.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:31 am to L.A.
quote:
bipartisan commission
Sure.
quote:
Caroline Fredrickson, the former president of the American Constitution Society
quote:
Fredrickson has hinted that she is intellectually supportive of ideas like court expansion.
Uh huh
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:32 am to L.A.
I love getting pounded in the cornhole by strangers
Signed,
Biden Voters*
*the 10 that actually exist
Signed,
Biden Voters*
*the 10 that actually exist
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:33 am to L.A.
The only silver lining to this is that 'bipartisan' commissions are where ideas usually go to die.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:34 am to L.A.
quote:
bipartisan commission
=
15 hard core Democrats + 1 RINO
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:35 am to TrueTiger
quote:
The only silver lining to this is that 'bipartisan' commissions are where ideas usually go to die.
There will be nothing actually bipartisan about this.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:39 am to L.A.
Libbies on here said no way Xi Biden will ever actually pack that MFer! 
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:40 am to L.A.
quote:
Biden Launches Commission On ‘Supreme Court Reform’
Translation:
Biden fires the first shot of the Civil War.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:42 am to L.A.
The American people will never have a voice again.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:42 am to L.A.
Attention John Roberts:
You, you compromised frick, are going to be directly responsible for allowing an illegitimate foreign actor to make your court utterly irrelevant.
You, you compromised frick, are going to be directly responsible for allowing an illegitimate foreign actor to make your court utterly irrelevant.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:43 am to L.A.
No one Right of Center (me included) wants to see the Dems "pack SCOTUS" by adding multiple Justices all at once, overnight changing the ideological balance of the Court.
Let's set that issue aside for just a moment and assume that there IS a way to expand the Court, slowly and over time, in a way that allows future Dem and GOP administrations to add a Justice or two.
What other objections would you have to a larger SCOTUS?
Let's set that issue aside for just a moment and assume that there IS a way to expand the Court, slowly and over time, in a way that allows future Dem and GOP administrations to add a Justice or two.
What other objections would you have to a larger SCOTUS?
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:43 am to L.A.
Sorry, I don’t read too much, but what does ‘pack the courts’ actually mean
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:46 am to AggieHank86
quote:
No one Right of Center (me included)
No one is mistaking you for being on the right.
quote:
future GOP administrations
Once DC and Puerto Rico get statehood, there will be no future GOP administrations.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:50 am to AggieHank86
quote:
No one Right of Center (me included) wants to see the Dems "pack SCOTUS" by adding multiple Justices all at once, overnight changing the ideological balance of the Court.
Let's set that issue aside for just a moment and assume that there IS a way to expand the Court, slowly and over time, in a way that allows future Dem and GOP administrations to add a Justice or two.
What other objections would you have to a larger SCOTUS?
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:54 am to Jbird
quote:I assume that you are asking why anyone would want a larger Court and thus that your opposition would be simply "more Justices are not necessary." I certainly understand that viewpoint.
Why?
I think that a country of 300 million people may well produce enough litigation and appeals to justify more than 100 cases per year getting review by the highest court. More Justice and hearings before panels (with the potential for en banc review) could provide additional capacity.
It is certainly a question worth examining, IMO.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:54 am to L.A.
Biden isn’t packing the court no matter what they say
Back to top


20










