- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How is revoking the permit for the Keystone Pipeline Expansion good for the environment?
Posted on 1/21/21 at 8:36 am
Posted on 1/21/21 at 8:36 am
To all the new lefties on the board, can you explain to me how revoking the permit for the Keystone Pipeline Expansion is actually good for the environment? We went from a method of transport which needs only electrically driven booster pumps where necessary to a method of transport that uses hundreds of "dirty" railcars or semi trucks? I thought electrical power was the gold standard in clean energy? I'll hang up and listen...
This post was edited on 1/21/21 at 8:55 am
22
Posted on 1/21/21 at 8:37 am to RoosterCogburn585
Warren Buffett has to get paid, duh.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 8:38 am to RoosterCogburn585
It’s like putting out a request for bids. Give enough to Hunter, include the big guy, your project can continue
Posted on 1/21/21 at 8:40 am to RoosterCogburn585
Unfortunately it's not about sound logic or reason. The leftist agenda is all about hurting the oil industry. The oil industry is one of the last bastions of mostly free capitalism with limited government interference and they want control. The industry has plenty of issues, many self inflicted, but a baseless decision like shutting down this pipeline will be a net negative to lots of parties. While it will hurt the environment more to ship with rail or trucks Mr. Buffett donates a lot of money to democratic politicians and his railroad investments stand to benefit handsomely.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 8:46 am to TigerDog83
I guess while we are on the topic of electricity being the "gold standard" for clean energy, can any of the leftists explain that one to me as well? They do realize that you have to burn fossil fuels in order to create it, right? You dont just plug into the wall and it's there....Oh, and lets just completely disregard the fact that the transfer of one form of energy (fossil fuels) to another (electricity) is riddled with physical inefficiencies....
This post was edited on 1/21/21 at 8:48 am
Posted on 1/21/21 at 8:47 am to RoosterCogburn585
The barrels that would have been on KXL will like the OP said be transferred by rail or truck to the US OR will be put on the Transmountain pipeline to Vancouver. Those barrels will then be shipped to likely Chinese refineries which aren't near as environmentally friendly as US refineries. US Gulf Coast refineries that would be buying heavy Canadian crude will have to buy heavy barrels elsewhere...likely from Venezuela, Saudi, or Iraq.
Overall KXL cancellation just makes gasoline/diesel more expensive for the average American.
Overall KXL cancellation just makes gasoline/diesel more expensive for the average American.
This post was edited on 1/21/21 at 8:57 am
Posted on 1/21/21 at 11:58 am to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
To all the new lefties on the board, can you explain to me how revoking the permit for the Keystone Pipeline Expansion is actually good for the environment? We went from a method of transport which needs only electrically driven booster pumps where necessary to a method of transport that uses hundreds of "dirty" railcars or semi trucks? I thought electrical power was the gold standard in clean energy? I'll hang up and listen...
its all a big show, it really does nothing for the environment
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:00 pm to RoosterCogburn585
Killing entire ecosystems with solar panels and wind farms is better for the earth than a pipe.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:01 pm to RoosterCogburn585
I thought it was about the indians?
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:02 pm to RoosterCogburn585
Map of pipelines in the US.. doubt one more would matter... but have let’s kill 20k jobs with the stroke of a pen
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:04 pm to RoosterCogburn585
But but it messes up the caribou habitat.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:11 pm to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
To all the new lefties on the board, can you explain to me how revoking the permit for the Keystone Pipeline Expansion is actually good for the environment? We went from a method of transport which needs only electrically driven booster pumps where necessary to a method of transport that uses hundreds of "dirty" railcars or semi trucks? I thought electrical power was the gold standard in clean energy? I'll hang up and listen...
I'm sure Joe will have a good cogent explanation for all of this when asked at his next press conference.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:18 pm to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
Since 2010, there were concerns that a pipeline spill could threaten the Ogallala Aquifer, one of the world's largest fresh water reserves. The Ogallala Aquifer spans eight states, provides drinking water for two million people, and supports $20 billion in agriculture.[128] Critics say that a major leak could ruin drinking water and devastate the mid-western U.S. economy.
Wiki
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:20 pm to TotalPotato
A lot of it does have to do w/ the Indians....reminds me of Yellowstone lol.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:21 pm to RoosterCogburn585
It's good for West Texas oil baws.
This post was edited on 1/21/21 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:22 pm to RoosterCogburn585
Remember when Slow Joe said he would always level with us.....well he lied about that on this one.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:28 pm to RoosterCogburn585
Same way raising taxes will help with deficit.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:30 pm to Dawgfanman
Revoking the permit for the Keystone Pipeline benefits Russian oligarchs.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:00 pm to RoosterCogburn585
The left will do what they can to raise the price of conventional energy so that "alternate" energy sources appear to be an economical substitute.
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:42 pm to RoosterCogburn585
Its not. Its meant to crash the economy so we will go broke.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News