- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Left-Wing News Hired Hitman Charged W/ 2nd Degree Murder Of Patriot
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:13 am to ninthward
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:13 am to ninthward
quote:18-1-704. Use of physical force in defense of a person
At no point was his life in danger and pepper spray is not lethal, also he shot the guy after the pepper spray. your assumptions are based off emotion not facts.
(1) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, a person is justified in using physical force upon another person in order to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by that other person, and he may use a degree of force which he reasonably believes to be necessary for that purpose.
(2) Deadly physical force may be used only if a person reasonably believes a lesser degree of force is inadequate and:
(a) The actor has reasonable ground to believe, and does believe, that he or another person is in imminent danger of being killed or of receiving great bodily injury; or
(b) The other person is using or reasonably appears about to use physical force against an occupant of a dwelling or business establishment while committing or attempting to commit burglary as defined in sections 18-4-202 to 18-4-204
2
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:16 am to AggieHank86
Pepper spray is not “great bodily injury”.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:18 am to Tiguar
Lol. It’s Hank.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:18 am to Tiguar
quote:Maybe so and maybe no.
Pepper spray is not “great bodily injury”.
I was simply correcting a misstatement of the law by Ninthward.
Colorado statute defines “bodily injury,” but does not seem to define “great” bodily injury. I suspect this will provide a lot of leeway.
This post was edited on 10/11/20 at 9:23 am
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:19 am to AggieHank86
“Great bodily injury” isn’t something cured by a jug of milk.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:21 am to AggieHank86
Just no. No maybe so.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:23 am to Tiguar
Oh good grief. If this was the other way around everyone would being saying it was justified.
Don't start none, won't be none. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes and all that.
Don't start none, won't be none. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes and all that.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:25 am to AggieHank86
LINK
quote:
Serious Bodily Injury”– has the same meaning as defined in section 42-4-1601(4)(b), C.R.S., namely: injury that involves, either at the time of the actual injury or at a later time, a substantial risk of death, a substantial risk of serious permanent disfigurement, or a substantial risk of protracted loss or impairment of the function of any part or organ of the body, or breaks, fractures, or burns of the second or third degree.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:25 am to nerd guy
quote:
Oh good grief. If this was the other way around everyone would being saying it was justified.
I wouldn’t be. So your statement is incorrect.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:25 am to Tiguar
quote:
Pepper spray is not “great bodily injury”.
Who gets to decide that?... the guy will get his day in court.
This post was edited on 10/11/20 at 9:26 am
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:27 am to lowspark12
Common law if it’s undefined, or they can extrapolate the definition of “serious bodily injury” above.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:27 am to lowspark12
You took Advanced Civics?
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:29 am to Tiguar
quote:Great bodily injury
Tiguar
vs
Serious bodily injury
You have convinced yourself that they are the same, bc you WANT them to be the same.
The rules of statutory interpretation beg to differ.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:31 am to nerd guy
quote:Dolloff was not even part of the initial confrontation. Victim turns from it and is immediately engaged with Dolloff. Who do you think initiated that confrontation? Considering Dolloff was observing the initial incident and approaching from the rear of the victim I think the most likely initiator is Dolloff.
Don't start none, won't be none. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes and all that.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:34 am to AggieHank86
What’s the difference in Colorado?
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:34 am to BayBengal9
quote:
The shooter is Antifa, whether he's a card carrier or not
I called it on page 7. This was an obvious conclusion from the first hour.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:36 am to AggieHank86
its riotously funny to see that the guy walking around with bear mace covers his face, points it at the security guard and walks up to him, then slaps the shite out of him, and the kyle rittenhouse crowd are all acting like they wouldnt be cheering if the sides were reversed after he gets shot.
when the cops shot the guy with a taser in the back outside of Wendys in Atlanta they all said "well he could have tased the cops then taken their gun", but suddenly that scenario doesnt apply, even though the Wendys guy was trying to avoid a fight and this guy is trying to find one.
when the cops shot the guy with a taser in the back outside of Wendys in Atlanta they all said "well he could have tased the cops then taken their gun", but suddenly that scenario doesnt apply, even though the Wendys guy was trying to avoid a fight and this guy is trying to find one.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:36 am to BayBengal9
9News is now in a quandary.
I predict they don’t have ledger entries for Pinkerton and I predict Doloff never worked for Pinkerton.
But they’re saying they hired him. So are they going to be party to the lawsuit from deceased’s family? I would guess so.
But they probably don’t want to go back and admit they never really hired this guy.
I predict they don’t have ledger entries for Pinkerton and I predict Doloff never worked for Pinkerton.
But they’re saying they hired him. So are they going to be party to the lawsuit from deceased’s family? I would guess so.
But they probably don’t want to go back and admit they never really hired this guy.
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:37 am to AggieHank86
Which is more severe, generally?
Hint: if it doesn’t meet the definition of “serious”, it sure as shite won’t meet the definition of “great”
Hint: if it doesn’t meet the definition of “serious”, it sure as shite won’t meet the definition of “great”
This post was edited on 10/11/20 at 9:40 am
Posted on 10/11/20 at 9:38 am to MI3
So if a leftist maces me, I can shoot them?
Just getting your rules of engagement on the books.
Just getting your rules of engagement on the books.
Page 16 of 99
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News