Started By
Message
locked post

California legislator passes bill for anal sex with children

Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:22 am
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52921 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:22 am
LINK

quote:

Under the new bill, which has not been signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, adults less than 10 years older than the minor who are convicted of having anal or oral sex with that minor would not automatically be added to the sex-offender registry


Legislator Weiner....

Gays having anal sex with children as young as 8 will not be sex offenders
This post was edited on 9/3/20 at 11:25 am
Posted by windshieldman
Member since Nov 2012
12818 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:23 am to
Democrats, kill babies before they are born, rape them after they are born.
Posted by Oswald
South of the St. George Buffer Zone
Member since Aug 2011
4186 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Democratic California state Sen. Scott Weiner, a gay politician who represents San Francisco

Rush is lambasting this subhuman prog filth...
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52363 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:24 am to
Let me help you out.


quote:

The California legislature passed a law late Monday relaxing sex offender registry requirements for sodomy and other acts with minors in efforts to end “discrimination against LGBTQ young people on the sex offender registry,” according to the bill’s sponsor.

Democratic California state Sen. Scott Weiner, a gay politician who represents San Francisco, first introduced SB 145 in January 2019. The bill “would exempt from mandatory registration under the act a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor and if that offense is the only one requiring the person to register,” according to the text of the legislation.

Under the new bill, which has not been signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, adults less than 10 years older than the minor who are convicted of having anal or oral sex with that minor would not automatically be added to the sex-offender registry, the San Fransisco Chronicle reported.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
101446 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:25 am to
Crazy that we lost Milo Yianoppolous for merely pointing out that gay men groom young boys
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:26 am to
In b4 hank.
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
13429 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:26 am to
So 22 and 12 is ok?

This is truly upside down world.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75342 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:26 am to
These people are sick.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:27 am to
You just rang the bell....

The Pavlovian responses will be shortly forthcoming....

It's like the usual suspects suddenly feeling a disturbance in the Force and feeling the need to reply and argue semantics.....
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
86098 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:27 am to
So the argument on this is that all the bill does is make the gay laws equivalent to the straight laws.

Which should be acknowledged to have a fair discussion.

But the next question is why we're extending this fricked up law to gay people instead of changing it for everyone.
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
6073 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:27 am to
this is the same state that allows the judge to put someone on the sex offender registration if vaginal intercourse takes place. what they did hear is was give the judge the same choice if the sex is in the butt.


they did not make anal sex with children legal.
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
33193 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Under the new bill, which has not been signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, adults less than 10 years older than the minor who are convicted of having anal or oral sex with that minor would not automatically be added to the sex-offender registry


Someone should offer an amendment to the end of this text to include “and would simply be shot”
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14918 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:28 am to
They are constructing their progressive utopia one lunatic act at a time.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
37735 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:28 am to
18 year old dude fricks an 8 year old? That’s okay bruh. He isn’t fricked up in the head.

Now.... a 19 year old dude fricking an 8 year old... we cant have that now can we?

California is fricked up.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
45270 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Gays having anal sex with children as young as 8 will not be sex offenders

Looks to me like it’s any adult, not just gay adults.

California. Oregon. Washington.
Y’all crazy.
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18168 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:29 am to
So many Democrat voters are fricking pedophiles, that the Democrat politicians feel the need to pass shite like that.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55427 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:30 am to
I've been telling you all for years:

If Dems can't abort your kids, they want to indoctrinate them and frick them. Now they are brazenly making laws to allow them to do just that.
Posted by BayouCatFan
Member since Jul 2008
4580 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:30 am to
So say a 21 year old guy has anal with his 14 year old girlfriend. Is he going to be a convicted sex offender? Seems unfair to me. If one group of the population can nail kids in the arse, then we all should.
Posted by Pianoman
New Iberia
Member since Dec 2003
2874 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:31 am to
Sodom & Gomorrah in California.....

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
Posted by seawolf06
NH
Member since Oct 2007
8159 posts
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:33 am to
The law is already bad, just discriminatory against Gay men. Instead of fixing the law which fails to protect young girls, they go the other direction. They are now failing to protect young boys and young girls.

quote:

[Currently,] a judge may decide whether to place an adult male not more than 10 years older than the minor on the registry if he has vaginal intercourse with a teenaged girl
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram