- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

California legislator passes bill for anal sex with children
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:22 am
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:22 am
LINK
Legislator Weiner....
Gays having anal sex with children as young as 8 will not be sex offenders
quote:
Under the new bill, which has not been signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, adults less than 10 years older than the minor who are convicted of having anal or oral sex with that minor would not automatically be added to the sex-offender registry
Legislator Weiner....
Gays having anal sex with children as young as 8 will not be sex offenders
This post was edited on 9/3/20 at 11:25 am
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:23 am to Strannix
Democrats, kill babies before they are born, rape them after they are born.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:24 am to Strannix
quote:
Democratic California state Sen. Scott Weiner, a gay politician who represents San Francisco
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:24 am to Strannix
Let me help you out.
quote:
The California legislature passed a law late Monday relaxing sex offender registry requirements for sodomy and other acts with minors in efforts to end “discrimination against LGBTQ young people on the sex offender registry,” according to the bill’s sponsor.
Democratic California state Sen. Scott Weiner, a gay politician who represents San Francisco, first introduced SB 145 in January 2019. The bill “would exempt from mandatory registration under the act a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor and if that offense is the only one requiring the person to register,” according to the text of the legislation.
Under the new bill, which has not been signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, adults less than 10 years older than the minor who are convicted of having anal or oral sex with that minor would not automatically be added to the sex-offender registry, the San Fransisco Chronicle reported.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:25 am to Strannix
Crazy that we lost Milo Yianoppolous for merely pointing out that gay men groom young boys
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:26 am to SirWinston
So 22 and 12 is ok?
This is truly upside down world.
This is truly upside down world.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:27 am to Strannix
You just rang the bell....
The Pavlovian responses will be shortly forthcoming....
It's like the usual suspects suddenly feeling a disturbance in the Force and feeling the need to reply and argue semantics.....
The Pavlovian responses will be shortly forthcoming....
It's like the usual suspects suddenly feeling a disturbance in the Force and feeling the need to reply and argue semantics.....
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:27 am to SirWinston
So the argument on this is that all the bill does is make the gay laws equivalent to the straight laws.
Which should be acknowledged to have a fair discussion.
But the next question is why we're extending this fricked up law to gay people instead of changing it for everyone.
Which should be acknowledged to have a fair discussion.
But the next question is why we're extending this fricked up law to gay people instead of changing it for everyone.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:27 am to Strannix
this is the same state that allows the judge to put someone on the sex offender registration if vaginal intercourse takes place. what they did hear is was give the judge the same choice if the sex is in the butt.
they did not make anal sex with children legal.
they did not make anal sex with children legal.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:27 am to Strannix
quote:
Under the new bill, which has not been signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, adults less than 10 years older than the minor who are convicted of having anal or oral sex with that minor would not automatically be added to the sex-offender registry
Someone should offer an amendment to the end of this text to include “and would simply be shot”
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:28 am to Strannix
They are constructing their progressive utopia one lunatic act at a time.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:28 am to Strannix
18 year old dude fricks an 8 year old? That’s okay bruh. He isn’t fricked up in the head.
Now.... a 19 year old dude fricking an 8 year old... we cant have that now can we?
California is fricked up.
Now.... a 19 year old dude fricking an 8 year old... we cant have that now can we?
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:28 am to Strannix
quote:
Gays having anal sex with children as young as 8 will not be sex offenders
Looks to me like it’s any adult, not just gay adults.
California. Oregon. Washington.
Y’all crazy.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:29 am to Strannix
So many Democrat voters are fricking pedophiles, that the Democrat politicians feel the need to pass shite like that.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:30 am to Strannix
I've been telling you all for years:
If Dems can't abort your kids, they want to indoctrinate them and frick them. Now they are brazenly making laws to allow them to do just that.
If Dems can't abort your kids, they want to indoctrinate them and frick them. Now they are brazenly making laws to allow them to do just that.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:30 am to bird35
So say a 21 year old guy has anal with his 14 year old girlfriend. Is he going to be a convicted sex offender? Seems unfair to me. If one group of the population can nail kids in the arse, then we all should.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:31 am to jamboybarry
Sodom & Gomorrah in California.....
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:33 am to Strannix
The law is already bad, just discriminatory against Gay men. Instead of fixing the law which fails to protect young girls, they go the other direction. They are now failing to protect young boys and young girls.
quote:
[Currently,] a judge may decide whether to place an adult male not more than 10 years older than the minor on the registry if he has vaginal intercourse with a teenaged girl
Popular
Back to top


47











