Started By
Message

re: The dad knew Ahmaud previously

Posted on 5/9/20 at 11:26 am to
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 11:26 am to
Fair enough. Still do not see enough from the video (which is very limited) to justify the use of deadly force to detain.
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
9464 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 12:08 pm to
I'm talking about the grown arse man that was being referred to as a kid.

Can you not read or are you being intentionally obtuse?
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28114 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 12:10 pm to
"citizens arrest'

Yeah, how'd that work out for ya?

You are not a police officer when you carry a gun, or lawman. Call the f'in cops and let them deal with it.


These rednecks can only blame themselves for the situation.
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11303 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 12:17 pm to
it would explain more why he suspected the kid and was stupid enough to chase after the dude with a shotgun
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140796 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 12:19 pm to
George. You’ve lost your damn mind.
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 12:39 pm to
quote:


Ahmaud Arbery was not a jogger


Yet he was clearly jogging

quote:

He was probably committing petty theft from the unattended property.


You 'probably' know that there 'definitely' is NO evidence of this, nor was there any evidence of it when the McRednecks decided to round up a posse and cut him off at the pass

quote:

The father and the son were not the police. 


Would have been nice had they comprehended that notion.

quote:

There is no way to justify this shooting.


Correct

quote:

he only thing in question is what degree of murder to charge the son and father with.



Murder in the first or whatever is the most egregious murder charge in Georgia
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19740 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

I haven’t even seen the video. I have seen responses to the video unanimously saying it was a cold blooded murder. If there is any reason that it could not be cold blood, then yes it matters.


This is the most complete video of the critical moments.

LINK
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
19092 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:49 pm to
"Greg McMichael, who provided gun cover for his son"
Fact or opinion?
Posted by westide
Bamala
Member since Sep 2014
2882 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:59 pm to
When I first saw the video of the shooting, I thought they should be hanged. Now a video comes out showing Ahmaud entering a house under construction on the street. A neighbor called the police and later Ahmaud runs out of the house and down the street. If the father and son tried to make a "citizens arrest" and Ahmaud grabs the shotgun then that changes everything.
Posted by GeorgePaton
God's Country
Member since May 2017
4495 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

These two idiots fricked up and murdered this guy. That was not self defense. The son committed first degree murder.




Well, well, what've we got here? More damning video released of your hero Ahmaud Arbery making an unathorized (and unlawful) entry into, what appears to be, a home under construction. You can see Mr.Arbery enter through the garage, and make a hasty exit out the front door. He gets caught and they chase him out the house. Mr.Arbery proceeds to "haul-arse" down the street out of that neighborhood in the most expeditious means possible. He definitely wasn't just out for a leasurely jog some have said. Whereupon it appears Travis & Greg McMichael make an effort to detain him long enough for the PO PO to arrive. We know they appear to be trying to detain Arbery, since on the video we observe the neighbor across the street from the house Trayvon (excuse me Ahmaud) on his phone calling 911 to report a crime in progress. The PO PO confirmed receiving a call during this time.

Unfortunately Mr. Arbery doesn't want to be detained since he is now a suspect leaving the scene of a crime. Not exactly breaking-in but definitely entering said house under construction. He (Mr.Arbery) charges Travis McMichael and the son is forced to defend himself. During the ensuing scuffle the son shoots and kills said suspect. Not a good ending to a wasted life.

It's all on film. No "onsite execution"......no racially motivated hit job by two "redneck, white trailer trash, low IQ White Males of European origin". Mr.Arbery charged Travis McMichael and the son was forced to use lethal force to protect himself. Bottom line.....open and shut case....self-defense. Just another petty career criminal who made a bad bad decision and it cost him his life.

Fire away............Ahmaud Arbery fans.

This post was edited on 5/9/20 at 9:33 pm
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

The dad knew Ahmaud previously


WTF difference does that make legally? Georgia law clearly requires vigilantes to witness this person committing a felony and their self-defense claim fails on its face because they were clearly the aggressors here. This is all irrelevant bullshite.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

I am not at all saying the kid was innocent (we have no way of knowing)


Citizen's arrest in Georgia requires the vigilantes to actually witness the kid committing a felony, the kid is innocent in that regard DUH
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

this new "information" really has no bearing on the murder case it only has bearing on the whole "holy shite this prosecutor's office should face consequences" case


Let's be honest, unless the venue where this trial is held is the most biased of all-time a la A Time to Kill, these two aren't getting away with this in a court of law, at most murder at least voluntary manslaughter it is what it is
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

They didn't stop him. They didn't arrest him. They didn't apprehend him. They ambushed him with guns and shot him dead. There is (almost) literally no backstory that can justify what transpired. Even if he had broken into and vandalized 20 homes that morning, citizens cannot perch from a truck and shoot someone dead.


Exactly! Georgia law requires vigilantes to ACTUALLY WITNESS THE VICTIM COMMITTING THE FELONY, otherwise that opens the door for gangs to wreak havoc on the streets and cause more of these deadly confrontations, it's that simple
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

the shooting was inappropriate and not called for.


Under Georgia law it wasn't a lawful citizen's arrest and at most murder and at least voluntary manslaughter there's no argument against this no defense, res ipsa loquitur it speaks for itself
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

It is amazing to me that people are trying to defend anything the McMichael's did here. On the flip side I think this idea that he was "just out jogging" or was out stealing doesn't matter. And I'm not sure why the family or supporters of the deceased feel the need to put it out. It simply doesn't matter.


It doesn't because UNDER GEORGIA LAW they have to actually witness him committing the felony
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 8:54 pm to
There are already enough circumstances to hang a jury up on Murder. And bias will be against thievery, not against skin color.

I do think the father and son are complete doofuses, and am not condoning what they did; this is just the reality of the situation.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

If they witnessed him committing a felony (astronomically small chance they did) then under Georgia law they could make a citizens arrest.


This is correct

quote:

The jogger wouldn't be able to claim self defense in the scuffle over the shotgun, and it would be justified.


Correct as well because they acted correctly under Georgia law

quote:

It all hinges on whether or not they saw him committing a felony.


BINGO!
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

There are already enough circumstances to hang a jury up on Murder.


Probably that's why I said "at most," genius

quote:

And bias will be against thievery, not against skin color.


Because it all depends on whether they witnessed him commit a felony, if they don't their defense won't exist

quote:

this is just the reality of the situation.


The reality is most likely these redneck vigilantes operated above and beyond the law, violated the law, and at most murdered a person, there's no argument against that, just accept it. This is all indisputable so far.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 5/9/20 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

Yeah as racist as people can be, it doesn’t have the ring of truth that they would just be out hunting black dudes. People have some crazy imaginations.


This has never been the point, you're just reading CNN twitter accounts to say this
first pageprev pagePage 31 of 33Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram