Started By
Message
locked post

Did the NYT allow Hitler to write opinion pieces in their paper?

Posted on 2/21/20 at 9:40 am
Posted by Gator515151
orlando, fl
Member since Oct 2009
121 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 9:40 am
Just wondering because today's NYT prints propaganda for the taliban.

LINK
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72193 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 9:45 am to
Wow.

Just when you think the NYT can’t sink lower.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67497 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 9:47 am to
That does it; I'm no longer using the NYT to wipe my arse
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96441 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 9:48 am to
The paper of Walter Duranty allows themselves to be used by a bunch of backward arse murderous fricks? Never.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142506 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Mr. Haqqani is the deputy leader of the Taliban
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27196 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 9:57 am to
Not creating a "free account" to that shite stain of a rag but I would actually be interested in reading it...

Especially considering this...

Foreign Policy.com
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 10:44 am to
Trump should use this as cover to withdraw completely from that quagmire.

Bring our troops and tax dollars home!!!
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112611 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 10:49 am to
No, but their foreign correspondent, Walter Duranty, won the Pulitzer Prize in Journalism for writing about how great a leader Joseph Stalin was. And how all the rumors of Russian people dying from starvation and execution was just propaganda from the western capitalist who didn't want people to know how great communism was.
Posted by artisticsavant
Member since Mar 2017
5008 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 10:52 am to
Amazing. Giving a bunch of murderers a platform. I wouldn't have known if it wasn't posted here, but still.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 10:56 am to
Enemy of the people.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33598 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 10:57 am to
quote:


Did the NYT allow Hitler to write opinion pieces in their paper?
Did we actively negotiate with Hitler? This seems like skyscreaming. would you have the same reaction if the Crown Prince of Saudi had an op-ed?
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
20025 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:13 am to
I’m glad I read that.

Until today, I had no idea how much they yearn for peace and now much they’ve suffered.

We really have been the bad guys for too long.
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
13513 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:24 am to
Apparently the Talibaners didn't get the memo that most people these days take The Onion more seriously than the NYT....
Posted by yatesdog38
in your head rent free
Member since Sep 2013
12737 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:29 am to
Did the president of the US talk to Hitler because our current one has talked to the Taliban.

This was a letter to the editor. They should have stated that on the front end for idiots instead of at the bottom, but carry-on.
This post was edited on 2/21/20 at 11:30 am
Posted by TSmith
New Orleans, La.
Member since Jan 2004
1656 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:31 am to
What is more interesting is that this is the only opinion piece that I have seen in recent memory from the NYT that is not behind a pay wall. Why? It makes you think.

Even when you click on previous opinion pieces, it does not allow you to view them. This one? No pay wall.
Posted by makinskrilla
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jun 2009
9728 posts
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:33 am to
The nyt, a former newspaper. -Andrew Klavan
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram