Horowitz actually testified there was no bias because ..

Government is full of incompetents and predators.

quote:

---

He asked them and they said they werent biased, is this real life????

---

Well, I mean, that's about all he can do.

quote:

---

Well, I mean, that's about all he can do.

---

Well, he could have pressed them:

Hor: Are you biased?
FBI: No
Hor: Are you SURE you're not biased?

Thought he said there was no proof of bias. There was no WB to testify that there was bias.

He said he didn't find evidence of bias. Which as far as I can see only exists with a confession -- something he wont get.

quote:

---

Horowitz actually testified there was no bias

---

False. He testified he does not have evidence of bias.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and I believe Horowitz was very clear in that position.

Horowitz: “So when you said Hillary Clinton should win 100 million to zero, were you being biased?”

Lisa Page: “Nope.”

Horowitz: “Well okay then. No bias.”



That’s essentially what’s happened here. And the Dems have the gall to act like they’re vindicated and beat Trump.

I have never felt truly hateful about anything in my life, but I honestly hate these people. This is so beyond absurd and evil I fricking hate it and I can’t wait for everyone who perpetrated and everyone perpetuating this shite to burn in hell.

At the end he kept saying accept for strock n page

quote:

---

Horowitz actually testified there was no bias

---

Actually, he didn't. He did not say there was no bias. He said that given his tools and authority, he could not differentiate bias from buffoonery. But he said it was one or the other.

Regarding "buffoonery", the assumption that 17 such separate instances by an entire team of the FBI's top attorneys and agents could ever occur solely d/t to unbiased incompetence is beyond unbelievable.

Horowitz's testimony suggested impossible stupidity should be considered plausible. He suggested that an entire team both as individuals and collectively could make 17 horrendous and rudimentary mistakes in the FISA process. Acceptance of Horowitz's testimony requires massive credulity.

quote:

---

This is the problem with people focusing on an IG report. He is supposed to steer as clear as possible from making judgement. Unfortunately, as Senator Kennedy said, the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

IG's are there to uncover, recommend, and refer. The next level, such as Durham, is tasked with figuring out intent and premeditation.

---

Again, this is nonsense.

Horowitz IS making tons of judgement calls. That’s precisely what he’s doing when he determines something was a “mistake” or “negligence” or “gross negligence” or “criminal”, and then he refers someone for prosecution.

Also, “There was no direct evidence of bias...” is not only a judgement call, but it’s an outrageously absurd bullshite lie.

Strzok and Page literally told us all over and over in released text messages that they hated Trump and his followers, while admitting they were taking steps to undermine him explicitly because of this prejudice they had against him.

I mean the goddamn words are there and irrefutably biased as all fricking possible.

But then somehow he didn’t think their subsequent anti-Trump actions weren’t motivated by their explicitly voiced words???

That is such obscene bullshite like there has never been such bullshite before. That’s the Mt. Everest of total fricking bullshite.

Horowitz flat out lied and filled that report with swamp covered bullshite.