Started By
Message
locked post

Californian musicians feel the pain of "worker's rights" aka "state control"

Posted on 11/29/19 at 12:51 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465586 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 12:51 pm
Worker's rights is a code word for giving up your personal autonomy to contract

quote:

Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez spearheaded a bill, AB5 which was intended to support workers’ rights - namely Uber, Lyft and DoorDash drivers. Rather than making a law targeting specific companies, they basically outlawed all independent contractors with few exceptions. It was signed into law on September 18, 2019 by Governor Newsom. Why haven’t you heard about it? Because it was run through committee so fast that no one really had time to process what was happening. So, no, we didn’t get to contact our representatives before the vote and plead with them not to vote for it or at least give the independent music industry an exemption.


quote:

How the law is written, if you want to hire a bass player to play your gig for $100 you have to put that bassist on payroll, pay unemployment taxes, provide benefits, follow labor laws, get workers compensation insurance, deduct taxes, work with a payroll company, W-2 that bassist as they now legally will be designated your employee. FOR ONE frickING GIG.

...

Oh and by the way, every venue in California can’t just cut solo artists a check anymore. You play a 45 minute set at the Bootleg and make $800? Well, you're now technically an employee of the Bootleg, they must deduct taxes, put you (and the hundreds of artists who play their venue each year) on payroll. FOR ONE frickING GIG.


just another example of "capitalism is freedom"

ETA: of course there are some expected takes

quote:

Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for "workers’ rights” and I’m sure Assemblywoman Gonzalez and Governor Newsom had the best intentions to support workers being taken advantage of by big corporations. They just didn’t do their due diligence and clearly have no idea how the music industry works. How this law affects musicians is not helping workers. It’s actually hurting them much, much more.


quote:

What we need to do:


We need to get an exemption for music professionals into this law before January 1st.


This post was edited on 11/29/19 at 12:52 pm
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
41554 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 12:53 pm to
A lot of IT people work as independent contractors too. That will really affect California.
Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

We need to get an exemption for music professionals into this law before January 1st.



Hmmm, he sounds like a greedy CEO.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465586 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 12:56 pm to
i am not even sure if this interpretation is correct, it's just a great example of the "i think this is a great law, for other people" mindset of progressives
Posted by dakarx
Member since Sep 2018
8139 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 12:56 pm to
Sounds like that is pretty much the end of all 1099 work. For IT contractors that would pretty much ruin their livelihood.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62566 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

So, no, we didn’t get to contact our representatives before the vote and plead with them not to vote for it or at least give the independent music industry an exemption.


I knew about this law with enough time that I could have called my state representatives if this was an Alabama law. These people are just morons who don't pay attention.

quote:

I’m sure Assemblywoman Gonzalez and Governor Newsom had the best intentions to support workers being taken advantage of by big corporations.


Yeah right. That law is bad for everyone.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465586 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:00 pm to
here is an LA Times article on the bill

quote:

Under AB 5, which will take effect Jan. 1, Californians will be considered to be employees of a business unless an employer can show the work they perform meets a detailed set of criteria established by a California Supreme Court ruling last year. Under those criteria, a worker is an employee if his or her job forms part of a company’s core business, if the bosses direct the way the work is done or if the worker has not established an independent trade or business.


quote:

But while the legislation began as a way to formalize the 2018 court ruling, it quickly became the focus of a high-stakes lobbying effort over which kinds of jobs and industries deserved exemption from the new rules. Doctors, accountants, architects, real estate agents, travel agents, graphic designers and investment advisors — along with many other professions — will not be subject to the strict employee rules under the new law.


quote:

Other exemptions come with conditions. Commercial fishermen are exempt except from unemployment insurance. Barbers, cosmetologists and manicurists are exempt only if they set their own rates, are paid directly by clients and schedule their own appointments. Salespeople are exempt, provided their pay is based on actual sales rather than wholesale purchases or referrals


exemptions: all you need to know about how shitty a law is
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138065 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

i am not even sure if this interpretation is correct, it's just a great example of the "i think this is a great law, for other people" mindset of progressives

This ideology is at the very core of their belief structure. It precisely how Bernie justifies his $750,000 vacation home.
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
31030 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:02 pm to
Clown World..Cali no longer looking like just a foreign state..but another country altogether..f@cking Martians.

Even Wendy has to lament their mass exodus to her weird Austin by now?
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52832 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:04 pm to
Another reason these scum will flee California and go vote blue in another state
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465586 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Even Wendy has to lament their mass exodus to her weird Austin by now?

she's found other areas of income, but she is 100% where i saw this posted on FB
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
79899 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:06 pm to
:shockedface:


No one could have predicted this.

Posted by Ollieoxenfree99
Member since Aug 2018
7748 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:08 pm to
Why don't they want to pay their fair share?
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9543 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:19 pm to
Why don’t they let workers negotiate their own pay and deals? Do they think workers are too dumb to know if they are being exploited?

More paternalism from the tolerant, benevolent regressives that ultimately fricks the people they claim to care about.
Posted by griswold
Member since Oct 2009
4236 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:28 pm to
I love how this a-hole is only worried about the music industry. Typical liberal only thinks about themselves while accusing OTHERS of being greedy.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
33931 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:29 pm to
It's a stupid law for sure, but by my reading of it, musicians would be excluded.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465586 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

but by my reading of it, musicians would be excluded.

why ?

even an LAT article said musicians likely would face issues. i think it's in the article i linked if not i can find it again
Posted by Sponge
Member since Nov 2018
4594 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:35 pm to
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
20697 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for "workers’ rights” and I’m sure Assemblywoman Gonzalez and Governor Newsom had the best intentions


As with everything else the left touches, you can’t judge them based on the results of their idiotic policies, you must judge them by their good intentions. So ignore the fact that governor Newsom and Assemblywoman Gonzalez wrecked they entire independent music industry for the state of California, they had the greatest of intentions so we’ll give them a pass.
This post was edited on 11/29/19 at 1:40 pm
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
33931 posts
Posted on 11/29/19 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Under those criteria, a worker is an employee if his or her job forms part of a company’s core business, if the bosses direct the way the work is done or if the worker has not established an independent trade or business.


I guess it would depend on some things. If an established band is hiring a musician, then that musician would likely be an employee of the band. (Music is their core business and they would direct the musician on the way the work is done) Although, depending on how the money is handled, they could all be partners.

If a bar or restaurant is hiring the musician, than he is likely not an employee. Music is not their core business and they are not directing the musician on the way the work is done.)

Just my opinion, on a stupid, convoluted topic.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram