Started By
Message

Tim Brando: "Alabama has Pure Playoff Privilege"

Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:44 am
Posted by LSUgrits
Somewhere between darkness & light
Member since Feb 2007
449 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:44 am
Tim Brando: College Football Playoff committee has some tough decisions to make

The whole video is relevant, however he starts talking about LSU & Bama at the 1:44 mark, best comment at 2:26
This post was edited on 11/11/19 at 10:50 am
Posted by LSUgrits
Somewhere between darkness & light
Member since Feb 2007
449 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:04 am to
You've got to see this video. . . . .
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84022 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:15 am to
He’s right. Right now, the system looks broken.
Posted by ibleedprplngld
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2012
4322 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:20 am to
He's right...
Posted by bulletprooftiger
Member since Aug 2006
2062 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:32 am to
I'm not watching the video, but this is premature hand wringing. The committee only exists to pick the top four teams at the end of the season. It does not matter who is number 1 or number 4 or number 12 this week.

The system is specifically not the BCS where preseason rankings mattered as much as on field performance.

The only reason the committee does weekly updates is to keep people paying attention and giving clicks.
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12278 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:34 am to
I don't like Brando, but he's right.
And the committee will play favorites, using such criteria as "the eye test".
Posted by mkemp0113
Member since Dec 2007
1200 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:34 am to
As long as there remains a subjective "eye test" and a system that doesn't account for recognizing conference champions, the whole thing will remain broken. I don't care how many teams you extend the playoffs to.
Posted by geauxtigahs87
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
26270 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:42 am to
Insanity

I swear their athletic dept pays these people.
Posted by shoelessjoe
Member since Jul 2006
9949 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:44 am to
It is broken. It seems to me that the committee goes mostly with an eye test and also use the name test also to distinguish when eye test isn’t enough.
Need to use some sort of point system wher variables are assigned points. Use:
Strength of schedule as one. The tougher the schedule the more the points.
Standings in Conference.
Ranking of offense and defense
Things like that and assign points penalize for easy schedules and things like that
Don’t go by who the coach is or what they have done in years past. It seems like the committee is too biased to do what’s been going on.
Posted by LSUcajun77
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2008
21346 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:45 am to
Bring back the BCS and take 4.
Posted by Jp1LSU
Fiji
Member since Oct 2005
2542 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:48 am to
I like Brando but completely disagree with many of his proposals for tinkering with the system. 6,8, or more teams is not the answer. I also don’t think all conference champs belong in the fray either. Automatic qualifiers will lead to 6-4 teams playing for a Natty.
I actually prefer the old BCS system.
Posted by WackyChris
Da Parish, Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
2793 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:51 am to
Tim Brando is never scared to tell it like it is, and it's awesome.

The CFP Committee is going to have some serious shite to talk about this week.
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
66549 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:53 am to
I haven’t watched yet but to even consider Bama is a travesty.

That’s like saying well they lost but we are putting the most stacked teams in any ways.

The games and schedule should matter. They couldn’t afford a loss with that schedule. They lost at home.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58375 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:56 am to
How long does Alabama’s playoff privilege last? How many seasons should the selection committee continue to slip them in on reputation and not on power of schedule and field accomplishments?
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58375 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:06 pm to
Bama thinking it should be let into the playoffs based solely on the fact that they are Bama is some elitists snap. Reminds me of how all of Al Gore’s four kids got into Harvard. This junk about giving certain teams free passes based on reputation and name recognition needs to end. They played no rank teams and loss to the only one they played. Bama should be out of contention.
Posted by Amadeo
Member since Jan 2004
4835 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:09 pm to
That's what a true sports journalist sounds like.
Posted by bbqguy
uppa LA
Member since Jul 2006
480 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:40 pm to
I've never understood the hate for Brando. He's been around long enough and seen the behind the scenes machinations to know what he's talking about here. I firmly believe there will be a push to put Alabama in the playoffs without a conference championship. It'll come from the SEC office to put two teams in the playoffs.
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
14262 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 1:01 pm to
It’s not wrong to use the “eye test”, but it should only be used as a last resort when all other metrics fail to differentiate.
Posted by LSUStar
Medellin
Member since Sep 2009
10455 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 1:28 pm to
I agree with what he says, but the playoffs are heavily influenced by ratings, ratings, ratings. There is NO way that the gophers or bears make it to the CFP. None. Too much money at stake.
Posted by DVinBR
Member since Jan 2013
13151 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 1:30 pm to
top 4 should be either unbeaten, or 1 loss conference champions

no exceptions
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram