Started By
Message

re: So what exactly is the main argument against universal healthcare

Posted on 11/2/19 at 7:26 pm to
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Again equating health insurance with health care is dumb


Again , thinking people who have healthcare are paying for those who don't is dumb.

Under your plan , we would be stuck paying for the losers in society .
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162258 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 7:31 pm to
quote:


Under your plan , we would be stuck paying for the losers in society .

You're already doing it. Why do you think you aren't?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

we have by far the most expensive system.


Comments like this are superficial at best and imo, apples to oranges.

In countries with socialized medicine, the amount spent is a number on a line item budget...that much to be spent on that number of people. Period.

In a free choice country, (you lefties are for free choice...right?) hundreds of millions of people are choosing to spend their money on hundreds of millions of "health care" choices, not just the procedures in the "we'll pay for this" qualifier.

What don't lefties understand about that??
This post was edited on 11/2/19 at 7:40 pm
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

You're already doing it. Why do you think you aren't?


No , I am not.

That's what the proponents of universal healthcare say but it's not true.
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30223 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

So what exactly is the main argument against universal healthcare


I don't want my healthcare controlled by one of the most financially inefficient entities in the world, the United States Federal Government. frick that.


Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

What if it's a minor that is not legally permitted to work? They should suffer because their parents are poor?



I have worked in hospitals in Oh, NY, NV, and USVI. I have never seen a patient turned away for inability to pay.

You really are spinning a losing argument.

PS: you never addressed the drop in quality aspect of your losing argument.
This post was edited on 11/2/19 at 7:47 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57407 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

You're already doing it. Why do you think you aren't?
Perhaps the dumbest argument ever. If doing something stupid and wasteful... do it more?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57407 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

I don't want my healthcare controlled by one of the most financially inefficient entities in the world, the United States Federal Government.
And let’s not forget the $21 Trillion in debt. It’s like depending on a person with $80,000 in credit card bills, a cocaine habit, and a $13,000 income to pay for your medical bills. What could go wrong?!
This post was edited on 11/2/19 at 7:56 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57407 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

They should suffer because their parents are poor?
Why should other kids suffer, to pay th sir bills? We can play responsibility and guilt transfer all day. you say those kids did nothing wrong. OK. What did their neighbors do wrong to deserve the burden of paying for them?
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11091 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 8:08 pm to
Let’s point out some flaws in the premise

Healthcare is a misnomer. The issue is sick care for a very sick populace

You cannot fix healthcare without making radical changes to nutritional and public policy

You would have to essentially undo decades of flawed nutritional policy
You would have to move work /school hours back to allow people to sleep. Conversely, you would need to restrict electronic exposures to enhance sleep. Sadly, this would have to likely be in the form of sin taxes/mandates

You would essentially need to completely overhaul the standard American way of life...

The glaring context that is missing in your graph is that the American system maintains some of the most apathetic, terrible baseline health folks there are. It is great at treating acute problems (trauma and surgical issues). It is terrible with chronic diseases (in part because it favors pharmaceuticals over lifestyle counseling. The European models do better because the baseline health of the populace is better. Our system generates profits by extending lifespan while not improving healthspan. This compounds the problem and is why the system is so expensive (more $$$ while managing chronically sick people)
This post was edited on 11/2/19 at 8:10 pm
Posted by Jeff Boomhauer
Arlen, TX
Member since Jun 2016
3552 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

Yeah. Just ignore the graph proving that we already have the most expensive healthcare system in the world by a wide margin

Nothing to see there right


I’m late to the thread but someone has to pay for the R&D to develop the meds. I’m all for every other country having to pay the same as we pay but for some reason democrats want to give everything to other countries in exchange for appointing their frickup kids to sweet pay to play jobs

Edit: don’t discount that because democrats are pushing for it that any class of people that aren’t considered democrat voters (white men) will get screwed over
This post was edited on 11/2/19 at 8:17 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68435 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 8:12 pm to
I can get in to see a specialist in a week and an MRI a few days after that. Socialized countries for the most part can't.

I've spent time in a VA and at Charity Hospital in New Orleans. Those were government run and the absolutely worst conditions I've seen in hospitals.
This post was edited on 11/2/19 at 8:14 pm
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

I think this issue is greatly exaggerated.
Your failure to consider reality is noted
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Again equating health insurance with health care is dumb
Agreed.

And, equating a great many health metrics in placed like fricking Sweden to "health care" is dumb too. But, didn't stop ya.

Our health care is fricking incredible compared to the rest of the world. Hell, the rest of the world HAS our health care. They just subsidize it. But, it's the same fricking health care...…..well, same PLUS a LOT more rationing.

You think because thinner white people in Sweden live longer and have fewer poor outcomes than our completely dissimilar population that they have better "health care"

Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

I can get in to see a specialist in a week and an MRI a few days after that. Socialized countries for the most part can't.
There are fewer MRI machines in Canada than there are in Tennessee.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57407 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

The glaring context that is missing in your graph is that the American system maintains some of the most apathetic, terrible baseline health folks there are. It is great at treating acute problems (trauma and surgical issues). It is terrible with chronic diseases (in part because it favors pharmaceuticals over lifestyle counseling.
This is sorta correct. we could stop treating about 13% of the population and cut the cost of “healthcare” by half. Great! Unless you’re in that 13%.

But that’s what socialized medicine excels at... doing what’s great for “society” at the expense of the individual.

quote:

The European models do better because the baseline health of the populace is better.
They're cheaper because they don’t treat expensive, chronic and terminal patients. The leave them to die.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162258 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

They're cheaper because they don’t treat expensive, chronic and terminal patients. The leave them to die.


What is our success rate with treating these patients?
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16641 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

We already have the most expensive system in the world and it's not even close



It's also the best. Explain why the wealthy travel to this country to pay cash for surgeries and treatments? Maybe because you, like the uneducated ignorant dolt that you are, have zero understanding about the realities of the healthcare in other countries and your simple-minded, first-page-Google-result graph is the best you can do.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64843 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

So what exactly is the main argument against universal healthcare


I’d say the fact that in order to pay for universal healthcare we would completely destroy our economy and bankrupt the country is the most valid reason to to oppose it.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162258 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 9:45 pm to
I'm curious what level of universal healthcare we could have by spending the exact amount we do now.

We currently spend more per capita than nations with universal health care.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram