re: Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’

quote:

---

the erosion of the nuclear family and an increased focus on the happiness of the parent, which in my view, should remain secondary to the rearing of the offspring.... At least until they are out of the house.

---

/\ THIS /\ is the way mankind raised itself out of the tide pools and became a successful specie.

Our culture now obsessed more with nihilism and are about to become swamp creatures again.

I’m curious as to how anything involving custody/domestic issues goes before a jury.

All these matters should be determined by a judge or hearing officer.

If I were on the jury they'd never convict you, Snakes should be shot.

quote:

---

Nonetheless, it is safe to infer that each side presented extensive medical and psychological evidence. The net result of that evidence is that a trial judge and 11 of 12 jurors all agreed on the result. That near-unanimity is a decent indicator that the scientific evidence was fairly strong

---

There is no such thing as a valid reason for a 7 year old to get transition therapy

Period

quote:

---

So if I live in Austin and decide to divorce my bat shite crazy wife, I’d have to go before my “peers” to see what happens with my kids and property?

They’d take one look at my manliness and be repulsed. I’d lose everything?

---

No.

Texas gives certain decisions to a jury (if requested) and others to the judge. Summary

quote:

---

Nonetheless, it is safe to infer that each side presented extensive medical and psychological evidence. The net result of that evidence is that a trial judge and 11 of 12 jurors all agreed on the result. That near-unanimity is a decent indicator that the scientific evidence was fairly strong.

---

Doubtful, this is a highly politicized topic. The vote took place in Dallas. If the case were here in Ascension Parish you'd see the vote flipped.

quote:

---

The net result of that evidence is that a trial judge and 11 of 12 jurors all agreed on the result. That near-unanimity is a decent indicator that the scientific evidence was fairly strong.

---

ROFLMAO

On what planet is this REMOTELY true

quote:

---

quote:

---

The net result of that evidence is that a trial judge and 11 of 12 jurors all agreed on the result. That near-unanimity is a decent indicator that the scientific evidence was fairly strong.

---

ROFLMAO

On what planet is this REMOTELY true

---

No doubt your experience with Texas juries far exceeds my own.

This can’t be real.

quote:

---

Buckley would’ve been railing against this story with a passion you consider beneath you.

---

I suspect that he (like me) would opine that the child is too young for any physical transition AND that he (like me) would disapprove of the father, if he were to kill the ex-wife in vigilante fashion.

I also suspect that he would keep his emotions in check. In a long career, I recall exactly ONE emotional outburst from Buckley, when Gore Vidal called him a Nazi.