- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
*Mueller Corrects* We did not reach a determination as to whether POTUS committed a crime
Posted on 7/24/19 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 7/24/19 at 3:12 pm
12
Posted on 7/24/19 at 3:13 pm to cajunangelle
Mueller is a mess.
He's flip flopped on this thing 10 times already.
Dude is legit senile.
He's flip flopped on this thing 10 times already.
Dude is legit senile.
Posted on 7/24/19 at 3:13 pm to cajunangelle
Barr needs to force him to go on television again and publicly revise his statement again. Embarrass the hell out of Mueller, like he did before.
Posted on 7/24/19 at 3:14 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 7/24/19 at 3:24 pm to cajunangelle
His back-tracking is irrelevant, the Democrats got the soundbite they wanted and will use it in the same vein they do the "indictments and prosecutions" aspect (ie: completely and purposely out of context).
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:59 am to cajunangelle
So, the timeline was...
1) In the morning, answering Lieu, Mueller misstated the reasons he did not indict Trump.
2) First thing in the afternoon, Mueller corrected his erroneous testimony to Lieu, by saying, "...we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”
1) In the morning, answering Lieu, Mueller misstated the reasons he did not indict Trump.
2) First thing in the afternoon, Mueller corrected his erroneous testimony to Lieu, by saying, "...we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”
This post was edited on 7/28/19 at 9:04 am
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:17 am to cajunangelle
Bottom line: if after two years of trying to find a crime to fit your charges and you can't find it, then you must conclude that a crime has not been committed.
That's the way it works.
That's the way it works.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:35 am to cajunangelle
1) 'They did not indict because of the opinion'
Sentence is factually accurate but can be misleading and ignores context.
2) 'They did not make a determination as to whether the president committed a crime because of the opinion'
Sentence is factully accurate and is much less misleading.
3) 'Because of the opinion our investigation into the presidents conduct was limited to a fact finding investigation and we made no attempt to determine whether the president committed a crime'
This is the reality and what Mueller says in the report.
Sentence is factually accurate but can be misleading and ignores context.
2) 'They did not make a determination as to whether the president committed a crime because of the opinion'
Sentence is factully accurate and is much less misleading.
3) 'Because of the opinion our investigation into the presidents conduct was limited to a fact finding investigation and we made no attempt to determine whether the president committed a crime'
This is the reality and what Mueller says in the report.
This post was edited on 7/28/19 at 9:38 am
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:43 am to cajunangelle
Must be nice to be able to correct your testimony.
Someone should ask him if Flynn or PapaD or Stone could correct theirs?
Someone should ask him if Flynn or PapaD or Stone could correct theirs?
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:44 am to cajunangelle
quote:
we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime
that determination would be for a judge or jury anyway
the only determination for a prosecutor is whether or not to allege a crime was committed
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:46 am to cajunangelle
Also, I would like to point out that,
“not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime” = he determined the President did not commit a crime.
“not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime” = he determined the President did not commit a crime.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 10:02 am to cajunangelle
I haven’t really been paying attention. Was that line why all these idiots have been screaming about putting Trump in jail when he’s not President anymore?
Posted on 7/28/19 at 10:43 am to cajunangelle
If the Public Utility meter reader comes out to your house and sits and stares at the electricity meter for two years and then goes back to his boss and says he can't determine if you used any electricity at all....then you probably didn't use any electricity and therefore you have no bill to pay.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News