- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:07 am to kciDAtaE
quote:
Of course. Why wouldn’t it?
apparently some on the OT believe you can say or post whatever you want on the internet and your employer shouldn't be allowed to fire you
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:07 am to arseinclarse
If they bad posted anti Christian content folks would be calling for their heada
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:12 am to jbgleason
quote:
Should FB posts made when off duty be held against officers when they come to work?
So you think these people can leave their obvious bias at home?
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:29 am to jbgleason
My problem with this whole situation is this: the posts were public for anybody to see, so this research group comes in and flags a bunch of them.
Are they going to make it public which posts where flagged and, more importantly, their criteria for flagging them? Because I'll bet sure as hell a lot of this shite is not black and white.
For example, did someone bash illegal immigration and some SJW in this research group flagged it as just bashing immigration. There's a clear difference that any rational person can see.
I hope for situations like this these officers form a coalition and sue this research group into oblivion.
Are they going to make it public which posts where flagged and, more importantly, their criteria for flagging them? Because I'll bet sure as hell a lot of this shite is not black and white.
For example, did someone bash illegal immigration and some SJW in this research group flagged it as just bashing immigration. There's a clear difference that any rational person can see.
I hope for situations like this these officers form a coalition and sue this research group into oblivion.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:31 am to jbgleason
quote:
they found officers bashing immigrants and Muslims, promoting racist stereotypes, identifying with right-wing militia groups and, especially, glorifying police brutality
I would love to see some examples of each.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:39 am to PrivatePublic
quote:
I hope for situations like this these officers form a coalition and sue this research group into oblivion.
What exactly are they going to sue for when this is publically available information?
This post was edited on 6/20/19 at 8:48 am
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:46 am to Displaced
quote:so you think the founding fathers were retarded. You're a moron.
People who think the first amendment means they can say whatever the frick you want with no consequences are retarded.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:47 am to Centinel
quote:
How about we stop hyperventilating over what anyone posts on social media?
quote:
They said they found officers bashing immigrants and Muslims, promoting racist stereotypes, identifying with right-wing militia groups and, especially, glorifying police brutality.
Yeah I love to have my local police posting shite like this. Really makes me feel protected.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:48 am to arcalades
quote:quote:
People who think the first amendment means they can say whatever the frick you want with no consequences are retarded.
so you think the founding fathers were retarded. You're a moron.
He didn't say that at all.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:49 am to arcalades
quote:
so you think the founding fathers were retarded. You're a moron
There's just no reasoning with someone this ignorant.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:57 am to arcalades
Man, am I that transparent?
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:58 am to jbgleason
Uumm, so I do design work for most pipeline companies, both crude and gas. If I were to get on FB (and as just an example) constantly post about how dirty the industry is then I think the company I work for has the right to find another role for me or fire me because its clear there is a conflict of interest and bias. How can I properly do my job if I do not respect and am biased toward the people (being the oil and gas companies) Im doing work for.
Cops are working for every person in their beat. So if the PD feels like a certain cop cannot work for each person without bias then there is a problem.
Cops are working for every person in their beat. So if the PD feels like a certain cop cannot work for each person without bias then there is a problem.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:59 am to jbgleason
If Philly is stupid enough to fire their arse, Murphy Paul needs to give them a call with an invitation to move to Louisiana. IDGAF what they post.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 8:59 am to jbgleason
Who the frick still uses Facebook?
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:01 am to Animal
quote:
They need to find 4 more.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:04 am to Centinel
quote:
So because social media is weaponized against one group, that makes it ok to be weaponized against another?
How about we stop hyperventilating over what anyone posts on social media?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
If you're a shite head off duty, it's pretty reasonable to believe you're a shite head on the job.
Is it fireable? Well that depends what was said, but it's worth a look by management nonetheless.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:07 am to TH03
quote:
Yeah I love to have my local police posting shite like this. Really makes me feel protected.
Well you're a white male, so you're good.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:12 am to jbgleason
reason # 846187461829 not to use social media....
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)