- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
David Griffin Q&A
Posted on 4/18/19 at 10:56 am
Posted on 4/18/19 at 10:56 am
LINK
I just finished watching this and I can't wait for next season! I'm ready for The Flappening 2.0.
I just finished watching this and I can't wait for next season! I'm ready for The Flappening 2.0.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 1:48 pm to Carson123987
Is there a transcript? I hate video
Posted on 4/19/19 at 12:20 pm to TigerinATL
Help.
Can't find a bit of information I heard (or thought I heard) from Griffin interviews.
Paraphrasing: I want a fast paced, high IQ team. Then later mentioned a big who makes plays??
I vaguely remember it being Indiana's Sabonis. He called out the name. Sounded like an endorsement of sorts.
Not trying to be lazy, but does anyone remember what I may have heard??
Can't find a bit of information I heard (or thought I heard) from Griffin interviews.
Paraphrasing: I want a fast paced, high IQ team. Then later mentioned a big who makes plays??
I vaguely remember it being Indiana's Sabonis. He called out the name. Sounded like an endorsement of sorts.
Not trying to be lazy, but does anyone remember what I may have heard??
Posted on 4/19/19 at 3:12 pm to kpop1
He mentioned wanting high basketball IQ players and lots of ball movement (in his introductory press conference IIRC). I'm not sure about the playmaking big, but that would play into the ball movement desire.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 10:45 pm to kpop1
quote:Sabonis is a guy I would love to have on this team. He brings a lot of hustle to a team. I think Indiana needs to make a decision between he and Turner at some point. Not sure what we would have to offer though unless we could turn someone like Brown in a Celtics deal into Sabonis via a 3 way deal.
Help.
Can't find a bit of information I heard (or thought I heard) from Griffin interviews.
Paraphrasing: I want a fast paced, high IQ team. Then later mentioned a big who makes plays??
I vaguely remember it being Indiana's Sabonis. He called out the name. Sounded like an endorsement of sorts.
Not trying to be lazy, but does anyone remember what I may have heard??
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:35 pm to NOSHAU
But why trade brown for sabonis?
Sabonis is def a solid player and def hustles and has an all around game but brown has a much higher ceiling.
If brown actually puts it all together watch the fook out.
Sabonis is def a solid player and def hustles and has an all around game but brown has a much higher ceiling.
If brown actually puts it all together watch the fook out.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 12:09 am to Chalkywhite84
quote:
But why trade brown for sabonis?
Sabonis is def a solid player and def hustles and has an all around game but brown has a much higher ceiling.
If brown actually puts it all together watch the fook out.
Issue is next year is when all the shite contracts come up and teams will have money.
Some team may decide a 16PPG, 46/37/70 (assuming improvement) very athletic high ceiling wing could be worth the max and become a star, then you'd have to match it. He might just be an otto porter at best. While Sabonis you should be able to keep for more like 20mil a year.
3-team trade:
Boston sends out Tatum, Brown, Smart, and Baynes with 2 picks
Boston receives Davis and Moore
- Why would they? They need to shed $$ to match for Davis, but they also get to keep a pick and get back a quality rotation SG. Kyrie re-signs and they need flexibility. They're also high on Williams to give some minutes as well. Low key issue though, they need to get scraps to fill out the bench.
Starters: Irving-Moore-Hayward-Davis-Horford
Indy sends out Sabonis, Holiday
Indy receives Brown
- Why would they? With their commitment to Myles Turner, they shouldn't invest that much money into another big. Swapping him for a wing like Brown gives them a young budding wing to put in the lineup to grow with Oladipo and Turner.
New Orleans sends out Davis, Moore
New Orleans receives Tatum, Smart, Baynes, Sabonis, and Holiday (along with 2 picks)
- Why would they? Pelicans know they cannot hold onto AD. While doing so, they are going to get a king's ransom and the perfect partner would be Boston (assuming we can't get zion/Ja).
Realistically, Brown has a higher ceiling, but his floor is also lower than Tatum's. Keeping both would be nice, but they'd be dreadful in the front court as it stands. Insert Sabonis, a lanky big that can improve his shot, not a liability at the line, decent defender, and overall someone who wouldn't likely break the bank to keep. The Boston parts are obvious and getting a 2nd Holiday is always nice to make your "franchise player" happy. Don't forget underrated defensive backcourt of Smart-Holiday and a viable 15MPG big in Baynes.
With #7, they select White
PG: White/Jackson/Holiday
SG: Holiday/Smart/Holiday
SF: Tatum/Williams/Miller/Hill
PF: Sabonis/Randle/Wood
C: Baynes/Okafor
This post was edited on 4/20/19 at 12:31 am
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:55 pm to htran90
griffin was on the jump (ESPN) today
on danny ainge:
on davis:
on jrue:
on danny ainge:
quote:
Griffin started out as a public relations intern with the Suns in 1993 and worked his way into the video room and eventually the front office. While Ainge was the coach, Griffin said he was the assistant video guy.
“He was a person that had a really big impact on my having an ability to get into scouting in the first place because he was giving me far more credit than I deserved for the players that I was ‘finding’ on video tape,” Griffin joked.
“I think to some degree you are mindful of what his tact is. You’re very mindful if you’re doing this right. You’re very aware of what everyone’s tact is,” Griffin said. “The negotiating tactics that someone uses and employs, you’re going to be aware of that.
“Danny is not unique in that. He has a very specific style. What makes the situation with Danny unique is we have the type of relationship where we can really call each other on all that nonsense and just sort of go, this is what it looks like. Because we have that ability it makes any conversation we have along the way, a fruitful one.”
on davis:
quote:
I think there’s going to be appreciation on his part for the fact that I would not have come here if it wasn’t for the fact that Mrs. Benson and her ownership team weren’t completely committed to winning. They very much are. Because of that, I think some of the concerns that Anthony probably had, we’re going to be able to alleviate. I feel like there is reason to be optimistic that he’s going to be open minded to coming back. But the real question is, what does it look like and can we give each other what we really need and be the sort of expression of greatness for one another.
on jrue:
quote:
So, Anthony Davis aside, if he’s with us, we’re obviously going to be building with a little bit of a leg up with a player of that caliber. But if he’s not with us, we’re going to be building in such a way where we have people who are all about this situation. (Jefferson) has heard me say this a bunch of times, you’re all the way in or you’re all the way out. It’s also from a competitive standpoint, from a chemistry and character standpoint, we want guys that are about the right things. I envision that’s what the team will look like. I actually had the opportunity to visit with Jrue (Holiday) today at the practice facility, he’s really excited about what we can do as well. I think he’ll be very active in helping us build this.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:00 pm to cgrand
Think there are some good times ahead fellas. Very excited to see the direction that Griffin brings this franchise.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:05 pm to LSUpelsSaints
compare that to the time demps went on ESPN and used their forum to educate and excite his fanbase about his plans for th....
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:10 pm to cgrand
Demps’ plans were apparently using GM mode on 2K to put together a roster.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:24 pm to teke184
quote:
Demps’ plans
MOAR BALL DOMINANT GUARDS
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:42 pm to whatiknowsofar
Every young vet on a big contract that he can get with a 1st round pick.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 7:01 pm to cgrand
Posted on 4/23/19 at 7:13 pm to TigerinATL
Can't tell you how much it bugs me that Rachel acts like Ainge is some next level genius all the time. Have the RESULTS of his trades been lopsided? Sure, because of luck or other factors after the fact. But he didn't "talk GM's into bad trades" like Rachel seems to imply.
Let me give you an example. She mentions Colangelo. That is the Philly trade.
If I were to tell you that Team A traded the first overall pick for the 3rd and the 14th pick two years later, who would you say won that trade? The team that got the 1st pick by a LANDSLIDE, right? Well, NBA history would back you up. The 1st pick is historically worth the 3rd, 4th, 9th, and 14th picks.
But Philly takes the wrong guy and handles it poorly and now Ainge is a genius? It doesn't work like that.
Ainge also trade to give up 4 picks, one that would eventually become the 3rd overall in order to move up and get Justice Winslow. MJ says no because he is obsessed with Frank Kaminsky. But yeah, Ainge is a next level genius. Not lucky.
The Kyrie trade has produced a better player for sure, but one who could leave after playing in two total playoff series and winning one. The team was definitely tighter and more cohesive prior to his arrival. But sure, I will mark it as a win. Thats fine.
Point is that she acts like this guy is playing 4-D chess while everyone is playing checkers. She makes this point about him all the time. But in reality, this is a good GM who had some great luck and/or the teams who traded with him had some really bad luck after the fact. He is not somebody that you should be terrified to deal with, as Rachel always seems to imply.
Let me give you an example. She mentions Colangelo. That is the Philly trade.
If I were to tell you that Team A traded the first overall pick for the 3rd and the 14th pick two years later, who would you say won that trade? The team that got the 1st pick by a LANDSLIDE, right? Well, NBA history would back you up. The 1st pick is historically worth the 3rd, 4th, 9th, and 14th picks.
But Philly takes the wrong guy and handles it poorly and now Ainge is a genius? It doesn't work like that.
Ainge also trade to give up 4 picks, one that would eventually become the 3rd overall in order to move up and get Justice Winslow. MJ says no because he is obsessed with Frank Kaminsky. But yeah, Ainge is a next level genius. Not lucky.
The Kyrie trade has produced a better player for sure, but one who could leave after playing in two total playoff series and winning one. The team was definitely tighter and more cohesive prior to his arrival. But sure, I will mark it as a win. Thats fine.
Point is that she acts like this guy is playing 4-D chess while everyone is playing checkers. She makes this point about him all the time. But in reality, this is a good GM who had some great luck and/or the teams who traded with him had some really bad luck after the fact. He is not somebody that you should be terrified to deal with, as Rachel always seems to imply.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 7:30 pm to Crewz
Biggest thing they gloss over is offering 4 1sts for Winslow. It’s never mentioned in his trade history.
This post was edited on 4/23/19 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 4/23/19 at 7:31 pm to Crewz
I agree in general that Ainge is overrated because he got lucky, but I think the Philly trade shows skill. Just like Atlanta valued Trae more than Luka, Ainge valued Tatum more than Fultz and had a good enough feel for the Lakers that he knew he could get who he wanted at 3.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 7:34 pm to Crewz
quote:
Point is that she acts like this guy is playing 4-D chess while everyone is playing checkers. She makes this point about him all the time. But in reality, this is a good GM who had some great luck and/or the teams who traded with him had some really bad luck after the fact. He is not somebody that you should be terrified to deal with, as Rachel always seems to imply.
Agreed. He has been VERY lucky because some teams are outright idiotic.
Brooklyn for example.
He's a good talent evaluator (or has a system that is good)... But the trades he loses when it comes to the numbers. He wins because he optimizes the picks
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News