- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Tatum plus 1 or Brown plus 5?
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:20 am
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:20 am
Let's say the trade is:
AD and Hill for Hayward and:
Scenario A: Jaylen Brown and picks 12, 13, 16, 27 and Boston's 2020 pick
Scenario B: Tatum and the 16th pick
Which do you take?
AD and Hill for Hayward and:
Scenario A: Jaylen Brown and picks 12, 13, 16, 27 and Boston's 2020 pick
Scenario B: Tatum and the 16th pick
Which do you take?
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:23 am to Crewz
Depends on what the new GM wants to do, slow build through the draft or stay competitive...
If you want to stay competitive you take Tatum and the pick, in this scenario if I know for sure that's where the picks are falling, I take Hayward and Brown, and possibly consider trading Jrue for more picks also.
If you want to stay competitive you take Tatum and the pick, in this scenario if I know for sure that's where the picks are falling, I take Hayward and Brown, and possibly consider trading Jrue for more picks also.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:23 am to Crewz
Is Dell still the GM? I dont trust him with all of those draft picks... Leaning towards what looks to be a sure thing in Tatum
Is this something thats been dicussed?
Is this something thats been dicussed?
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:25 am to Crewz
A.
I would trade a couple of the #1s for 2020 #1s.
I would trade a couple of the #1s for 2020 #1s.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:26 am to Crewz
quote:
Which do you take?
I take Tatum and 16 over Brown and 4 more scratch-offs. With 4 of the 5 picks being in the same year the odds of you both finding and developing a Tatum level talent are pretty low.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:26 am to Crewz
If Gentry and Dell are in Nola I could care less.
If they are both gone then A always.
Tatum won't sign on and we will be in this fricked up situation again.
If they are both gone then A always.
Tatum won't sign on and we will be in this fricked up situation again.
This post was edited on 12/27/18 at 8:28 am
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:32 am to Crewz
Scenario B. Anything with Tatum.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:32 am to Aussie_Pelican
quote:
Tatum won't sign on and we will be in this fricked up situation again.
Not true. It's very rare that max level players don't sign their 2nd contract. It only happens when there's a dispute over their max worthiness like with Greg Monroe. That won't be the case with Tatum. For his 3rd contract we could be back here again, but that's a long ways off.
This post was edited on 12/27/18 at 8:33 am
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:33 am to Crewz
What do you think about Dallas as an "out of nowhere" team that trades for AD? Dallas can strip down to basically Barnes/AD/Jordan and $35-$40 million in cap space to fill out the roster. More money if they want anyone more than Barnes/DJ. They can easily strip it bare Big 3 Miami style. The Pels would get Doncic, Smith Jr., Powell, a filler contract and picks.
Cuban gets to build a potential contender level team immediately and the Pels get something good enough to be a solid playoff team now and a player in Doncic that has as much star potential as anyone they are likely to draft in the next 2-3 years.
Cuban gets to build a potential contender level team immediately and the Pels get something good enough to be a solid playoff team now and a player in Doncic that has as much star potential as anyone they are likely to draft in the next 2-3 years.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:35 am to Crewz
Me personally I would go with B just because of Tatum. But Answer this, Dont you think this team fully healthy is a dangerous team. We started off hot when we were healthy... now I do agree they haven’t done well staying afloat while everyone is hurt. I would think AD knows how well we played when we were healthy and I think he is holding out on his decision until we are healthy.
This post was edited on 12/27/18 at 8:38 am
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:42 am to TigerinATL
Theres around a 0% chance Dallas thinks about moving Luka, even in a deal for AD
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:42 am to Aussie_Pelican
I’d take brown and the picks, as well as a new gm and coach.
If Hayward gets back to himself next year, you find simply 1 really good player with those draft picks, and you have a coach that can actually coach, we’d be a good team. If you draft Hilton Armstrong and Cedric Simmons again, then we are screwed.
I’d trade Niko for a first as well. Maybe you can trade some of those 1sts for a top 5 pick. We’d probably continue to suck this year so our pick would be top 10.
So a top 10 pick, 3 picks in the teens, 2 in the late firsts and a late firsts next year, it would be hard to frick that up. And you’d still have a solid core of Jrue/Hayward/Brown/Randle.
If Hayward gets back to himself next year, you find simply 1 really good player with those draft picks, and you have a coach that can actually coach, we’d be a good team. If you draft Hilton Armstrong and Cedric Simmons again, then we are screwed.
I’d trade Niko for a first as well. Maybe you can trade some of those 1sts for a top 5 pick. We’d probably continue to suck this year so our pick would be top 10.
So a top 10 pick, 3 picks in the teens, 2 in the late firsts and a late firsts next year, it would be hard to frick that up. And you’d still have a solid core of Jrue/Hayward/Brown/Randle.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:48 am to Soggymoss
quote:
Theres around a 0% chance Dallas thinks about moving Luka, even in a deal for AD
I think it would be crazy to say he is off limits, but I could see them wanting to give up less if he was involved.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:52 am to Crewz
Tatum 10 times out of 10.
This is the NBA not the NFL. You take the best player.
This is the NBA not the NFL. You take the best player.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:59 am to Crewz
Scenario B, but why would Boston trade Hayward?
Wouldn't it make more sense for them to include Horford since AD would play the same position? Keeping Hayward would allow them to at least be semi competitive with Golden State when they meet in the championship.
Wouldn't it make more sense for them to include Horford since AD would play the same position? Keeping Hayward would allow them to at least be semi competitive with Golden State when they meet in the championship.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:02 am to TigerinATL
quote:
I take Tatum and 16 over Brown and 4 more scratch-offs. With 4 of the 5 picks being in the same year the odds of you both finding and developing a Tatum level talent are pretty low.
This, and it's not even a discussion imo.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:03 am to Colonel Flagg
Cuban has a man crush on him, I can pretty much guarantee he will say he is off limits.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:03 am to TigerinATL
quote:
What do you think about Dallas as an "out of nowhere" team that trades for AD? Dallas can strip down to basically Barnes/AD/Jordan and $35-$40 million in cap space to fill out the roster.
Dallas will be stripping down after this year to Doncic, DSJ and Barnes and $55M in cap space. Or Doncic, Barnes and whatever they get back in a DSJ trade.
I'd rather that over AD.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:08 am to Soggymoss
I’m more curious if a team of Holiday, Tatum, Hayward, Mirotic and Randle is really competitive. Of course everyone will say, AD is gone so that team is dead. But I bet they would win a good amount of games.
Popular
Back to top

23





