Started By
Message

re: Why are Democrats ok with pedophilia

Posted on 10/17/18 at 3:58 am to
Posted by Ollieoxenfree99
Member since Aug 2018
7748 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 3:58 am to
Stop babbling about this Hay dude. I've never seen him covered in relation to gay rights/marriage.

Should everyone reject Christianity bc of one loon evangelist? This doesn't even make any sense.
Posted by FightnBobLafollette
Member since Oct 2017
12204 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 3:59 am to
The fight was over by the mid 80s when it was solely alone in its positions.

Let me just drop this from GLAAD in 94.

Position Statement Regarding NAMBLA", which said GLAAD "deplores the North American Man Boy Love Association's (NAMBLA) goals, which include advocacy for sex between adult men and boys and the removal of legal protections for children. These goals constitute a form of child abuse and are repugnant to GLAAD.”

Stop pretending that support for NAMBLA in the gay community is there. In fact it was so poor that NAMBLA ceased to exist. And reports are that at best it had 1000 members.
Posted by mofungoo
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
4583 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 6:07 am to
quote:

Why are Democrats ok with pedophilia

Because they like to bugger children

MAGA
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 6:11 am to
Is this a thread about pizzagate? Do people still believe that?
Posted by Cow Drogo
Member since Jul 2016
7409 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 6:14 am to
There were literally Democrats Arguing that it should be acceptable as their sexual preference that they can’t control
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21566 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 6:15 am to
No moral base
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
28659 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 7:14 am to
It's a taboo subject. My understanding is that they're not ok with the ACT of it, but to let someone that has the affliction of being attracted to younger age people not be judged or persecuted. It is not something they can help... rather, something to applaud if they step out of the shadows (to get help.)

It's their last teue drum to beat that hasn't been used.
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 7:15 am
Posted by dr smartass phd
RIP 8/19
Member since Sep 2004
20387 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 7:18 am to
quote:

Harry Hay



Old grandpa Walton's bitch
Posted by KeyserSoze999
Member since Dec 2009
10608 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 7:19 am to
The deviancy of men who like penis, if you are deviant in one area, the odds increase exponentially that you are deviant in other, secret areas, fact.

Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53528 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Stop babbling about this Hay dude. I've never seen him covered in relation to gay rights/marriage.


I don't see CNN covering Trump's successes either, yet he has them. Your point isn't valid.

What is valid is the history of the movement.


quote:

Should everyone reject Christianity bc of one loon evangelist? This doesn't even make any sense.


If you want to make that an apples to apples, are the Christians putting up that "loon" as a hero that is celebrated every year?

IS that loon's speeches and thoughts used wide spread in the Church?


Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53528 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:42 am to
quote:

The fight was over by the mid 80s when it was solely alone in its positions.


I know when the fight was. Thanks for helping make my point though. Considering Obama's Czar pushed books in school systems that openly talked about young boys having sex with old men as a positive it's obvious that the movement never left it.


Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:42 am to
They prefer the term minor attracted person.


And Democrats are okay with with because they are mentally ill.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:44 am to
quote:


Where are you seeing dems being ok with pedos?


propaganda here.

The group, dems, does not approve.

Now that you know the truth vote Green.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67249 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:47 am to
Because they ARE pedophiles or at least have pedos within their upper ranks that they feel they need to cover for and protect.
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 10:48 am
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
11870 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:49 am to
quote:

According to George Takai, pedophilia is a very healthy and important part of being a homosexual


Or a Catholic
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Funny, I hear left wing lunatics constantly arguing that children have the mental capability to agree to sex change operations.
What you are “hearing” is Breitbart and Gateway Pundit findng the three people on the contnent who hold such views ... and then pretending that they are manstream.
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 10:56 am
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53528 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:58 am to
quote:

What you are “hearing” is Breitbart and Gateway Pundit findng the three people on the contnent who hold such views ... and then pretending that they are manstream.


Nope. Just in this thread I have shown 2 men (and there are more). One a hero and political advocate. The other Obama's Schools czar.

Obama's guy pushed books in schools and I have given you the names of a few of them with quoted excerpts from it.


Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:59 am to
quote:

What you are “hearng” is Breitbart and Gateway Pundit

Really? Just Breitbart and Gateway drumming up nonsense? No reputable news agency that you read would push that right?

ABC News

HuffPo

PBS

DailyMail

CBS News

BBC

NYTimes

Do you want me to keep going?
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17892 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Serious question, why?


Why wouldn't they be? If one desires an existence with no accountability or judgement, then what would ever be off limits?

In a world of moral relativism, why would anything ever be out of bounds?
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 11:04 am to
quote:

I've never seen him covered in relation to gay rights/marriage.



Can’t you see that is by design?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram